EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 40 / No 1 (Janvier 2024) Med Sci (Paris), 40 1 (2024) 72-78 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 40, Number 1, Janvier 2024
La cavité orale et les dents au cœur de la santé
Page(s) 72 - 78
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023198
Published online 01 February 2024
  1. Cavard S, Alvarez JC, De Mazancourt P, et al. Forensic and police identification of “X” bodies. A 6-years French experience. Forensic Sci Int 2011 ; 204 : 139–143. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cattaneo C, Porta D, De Angelis D, et al. Unidentified bodies and human remains: an Italian glimpse through a European problem. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 195 : 167.e1–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mazzarelli D, Milotta L, Franceschetti L, et al. Twenty-five years of unidentified bodies: an account from Milano, Italy. Int J Legal Med 2021; 135 : 1983–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beauthier JP. Traité de médicine légale. 2e édition. Bruxelles : DeBoeck Éditions, 2011, 1056 pp. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nuzzolese E. Missing people, migrants, identification and human rights. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2012 ; 30 : Suppl 1 : 47–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Duday H, Courtaud P, Crubézy E, et al. L’anthropologie « de terrain » : reconnaissance et interprétation des gestes funéraires. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 1990 ; 2 : 29–49. [Google Scholar]
  7. Heathfield LJ, Haikney TE, Mole CG, et al. Forensic human identification: Investigation into tooth morphotype and DNA extraction methods from teeth. Sci Justice 2021; 61 : 339–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andelinovic´ S, Sutlovic´ D, Erceg Ivkosic´ I, et al. Primorac, Twelve-year experience in identification of skeletal remains from mass graves. Croat Med J 2005; 46 : 530–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nuzzolese E, Torreggianti M. The need for a complete dental autopsy of unidentified edentulous human remains. Forensic Sci Res 2021; 7 : 319–22. [Google Scholar]
  10. Auderset FC, Connert T, Meller C, et al. Evaluation of five methods to identify composite restorations in human teeth on a forensic purpose-an ex vivo comparative study. Int J Legal Med 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02869-z. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chiam SL, Louise J, Higgins D. “Identified”, “probable”, “possible” or “exclude”: The influence of task-irrelevant information on forensic odontology identification opinion. Sci Justice 2022; 62 : 461–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruzek J, Schmitt A, Murail P. Identification biologique individuelle en paléoanthropologie : détermination du sexe et estimation de l’âge au décès à partir du squelette. In Dutour O, Hublin JJ, Vandermeersch B (éds). Objets et Méthodes en Paléoanthropologie. Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques 2005 : pp. 217–46. [Google Scholar]
  13. Coelho J, Armelim Almiro P, Nunes T, et al. Sex and age biological variation of the mandible in a Portuguese population - a forensic and medico-legal approaches with three-dimensional analysis. Sci Justice 2021; 61 : 704–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Baliso A, Heathfield LJ, Gibbon VE. Forensic human identification: retrospective investigation of anthropological assessments in the Western Cape, South Africa. Int J Legal Med 2023; 137 : 793–807. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmitt A. Estimation de l’âge au décès des adultes à partir du squelette : des raisons d’espérer. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 2002 ; 14 : 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chaillet N, Nyström M, Demirjian A. Comparison of dental maturity in children of different ethnic origins: international maturity curves for clinicians. J Forensic Sci 2005 ; 50 : 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reppien K, Sejrsen B, Lynnerup N. Evaluation of post-mortem estimated dental age versus real age: a retrospective 21-year survey. Forensic Sci Int 2006 ; 159 : S84–S88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pinchi V, Pradella F, Buti J, et al. A new age estimation procedure based on the 3D CBCT study of the pulp cavity and hard tissues of the teeth for forensic purposes: a pilot study. J Forensic Leg Med 2015 ; 36 : 150–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cameriere R, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, et al. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth with Bayesian calibration approach. Forensic Sci Int 2016 ; 258 : 50–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Drusini AG, Toso O, Ranzato C. The coronal pulp cavity index: a biomarker for age determination in human adults. Am J Phys Anthropol 1997 ; 103 : 353–363. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001 ; 19 : 9–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lucas VS, Andiappan M, McDonald F, Roberts G. Dental age estimation: a test of the reliability of correctly identifying a subject over 18 years of age using the gold standard of chronological age as the comparator. J Forensic Sci 2016 ; 61 : 1238–1243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Adserias-Garriga J, Nogué-Navarro L, Zapico SC, Ubelaker DH. Setting the light conditions for measuring root transparency for age-at-death estimation methods. Int J Legal Med 2018 ; 132 : 637–641. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Brothwell DR. Digging Up Bones : The Excavation, Treatment and Study of Human Skeletal Remains. Londres : British Museum of Natural History, 1981 : 208 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Aufderheide AC, Rodriguez-Martin C. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 : 496 p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee WJ, Wilkinson CM, Hwang HS. An accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone-beam computed tomography from live subjects. J Forensic Sci 2012 ; 57 : 318–327. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guyomarc’h P, Santos F, Dutailly B, Coqueugniot H. Facial soft tissue depths in French adults: variability, specificity and estimation. Forensic Sci Int 2013; 231 : 411.e1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stephan CN, Caple JM, Guyomarc’h P, Claes P. An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging. Forensic Sci Res 2019; 4 : 10–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim SM, Lee WJ, Cho JH, et al. An investigation of environmental factors influencing quantitative accuracy and recognition rate of craniofacial reconstructions. J Environ Biol 2020; 41 : 539–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. De Donno A, Mele F, Angrisani C, et al. Facial approximation for identification purposes: soft tissue thickness in a Caucasian population. Sex and age-related variations. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2022; 1 : 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  31. Légifrance. Loi n° 95–73 du 21 janvier 1995 d’orientation et de programmation relative à la sécurité. Article 26. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006527983/. [Google Scholar]
  32. Légifrance. Code civil. Article 16–11. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000039367698/. [Google Scholar]
  33. Légifrance. Code civil. Art 87 https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000033460936/. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jayakrishnan JM, Reddy J, Vinod Kumar RB. Role of forensic odontology and anthropology in the identification of human remains. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2021; 25 : 543–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.