EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 39 / No 4 (Avril 2023) Med Sci (Paris), 39 4 (2023) 351-358 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 39, Number 4, Avril 2023
Page(s) 351 - 358
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023052
Published online 24 April 2023
  1. Verdaasdonk JS, Stephens AD, Haase J, et al. Bending the Rules: Widefield Microscopy and the Abbe Limit of Resolution. J Cell Physiol 2014 ; 229 : 132–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sahl SJ, Hell SW, Jakobs S. Fluorescence nanoscopy in cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017 ; 18 : 685–701. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jacquemet G, Carisey AF, Hamidi H, et al. Cell science at a glance. The cell biologist’s guide to super-resolution microscopy. J Cell Sci 2020; 133 : jcs240713. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schermelleh L, Ferrand A, Huser T, et al. Super-resolution microscopy demystified. Nat Cell Biol 2019 ; 21 : 72–84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sieben C, Douglass KM, Guichard P, et al. Super-resolution microscopy to decipher multi-molecular assemblies. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2018 ; 49 : 169–176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen F, Tillberg PW, Boyden ES. Optical imaging. Expansion microscopy. Science 2015 ; 347 : 543–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao R, Yu CJ, Gao L, et al. A highly homogeneous polymer composed of tetrahedron-like monomers for high-isotropy expansion microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol 2021; 16 : 698–707. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Damstra HG, Mohar B, Eddison M, et al. Visualizing cellular and tissue ultrastructure using Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy (TREx). eLife 2022; 11. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chozinski TJ, Halpern AR, Okawa H, et al. Expansion microscopy with conventional antibodies and fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods 2016 ; 13 : 485–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamel V, Guichard P. Improving the resolution of fluorescence nanoscopy using post-expansion labeling microscopy. Methods Cell Biol 2021; 161 : 297–315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ku T, Swaney J, Park JY, et al. Multiplexed and scalable super-resolution imaging of three-dimensional protein localization in size-adjustable tissues. Nat Biotechnol 2016 ; 34 : 973–981. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zwettler FU, Reinhard S, Gambarotto D, et al. Molecular resolution imaging by post-labeling expansion single-molecule localization microscopy (Ex-SMLM). Nat Commun 2020; 11 : 3388. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wassie AT, Zhao Y, Boyden ES. Expansion microscopy: principles and uses in biological research. Nat Methods 2019 ; 16 : 33–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gambarotto D, Zwettler FU, Le Guennec M, et al. Imaging cellular ultrastructures using expansion microscopy (U-ExM). Nat Methods 2019 ; 16 : 71–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gambarotto D, Hamel V, Guichard P. Ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM). Methods Cell Biol 2021; 161 : 57–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steib E, Laporte MH, Gambarotto D, et al. Wdr90 is a centriolar microtubule wall protein important for centriole architecture integrity. eLife 2020; 9 : 1–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Le Guennec M, Klena N, Gambarotto D, et al. A helical inner scaffold provides a structural basis for centriole cohesion. Sci Adv 2020; 6 : eaaz4137. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Laporte MH, Bouhlel IB, Bertiaux E, et al. Human SFI1 and Centrin form a complex critical for centriole architecture and ciliogenesis. EMBO J 2022; 41 : e112107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karasu OR, Neuner A, Atorino ES, et al. The central scaffold protein CEP350 coordinates centriole length, stability, and maturation. J Cell Biol 2022; 221 : e202203081. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. van den Hoek H, Klena N, Jordan MA, et al. In situ architecture of the ciliary base reveals the stepwise assembly of intraflagellar transport trains. Science 2022; 377 : 543–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Le Borgne P, Greibill L, Laporte MH, et al. The evolutionary conserved proteins CEP90, FOPNL, and OFD1 recruit centriolar distal appendage proteins to initiate their assembly. PLOS Biol 2022; 20 : e3001782. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Park J, Khan S, Yun DH, et al. Epitope-preserving magnified analysis of proteome (eMAP). Sci Adv 2021; 7 : eabf6589. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sahabandu N, Kong D, Magidson V, et al. Expansion microscopy for the analysis of centrioles and cilia. J. Microsc. 2019 ; 276 : 145–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kellenberger E, Johansen R, Maeder M, et al. Artefacts and morphological changes during chemical fixation. J Microsc 1992 ; 168 : 181–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dubochet J, McDowall AW. Vitrification of pure water for electron microscopy. J Microsc 1981; 124 : RP3–RP4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kellenberger E. The potential of cryofixation and freeze substitution: observations and theoretical considerations. J Microsc 1991 ; 161 : 183–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Laporte MH, Klena N, Hamel V, et al. Visualizing the native cellular organization by coupling cryofixation with expansion microscopy (Cryo-ExM). Nat Methods 2022; 19 : 216–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yu C-C (Jay), Barry NC, Wassie AT, et al. Expansion microscopy of C. elegans. eLife 2020; 9. [Google Scholar]
  29. M’Saad O, Bewersdorf J. Light microscopy of proteins in their ultrastructural context. Nat Commun 2020; 11 : 3850. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sarkar D, Kang J, Wassie AT, et al. Revealing nanostructures in brain tissue via protein decrowding by iterative expansion microscopy. Nat Biomed Eng 2022; 6 : 1057–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mercey O, Kostic C, Bertiaux E, et al. The connecting cilium inner scaffold provides a structural foundation that protects against retinal degeneration. PLOS Biol 2022; 20 : e3001649. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mahecic D, Gambarotto D, Douglass KM, et al. Homogeneous multifocal excitation for high-throughput super-resolution imaging. Nat Methods 2020; 17 : 726–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vásquez-Limeta A, Lukasik K, Kong D, et al. CPAP insufficiency leads to incomplete centrioles that duplicate but fragment. J Cell Biol 2022; 221 : e202108018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kong D, Sahabandu N, Sullenberger C, et al. Prolonged mitosis results in structurally aberrant and over-elongated centrioles. J Cell Biol 2020; 219 : e201910019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mahen R. cNap1 bridges centriole contact sites to maintain centrosome cohesion. PLOS Biol 2022; 20 : e3001854. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Woglar A, Pierron M, Schneider FZ, et al. Molecular architecture of the C. elegans centriole. PLOS Biol 2022; 20 : e3001784. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Bertiaux E, Balestra AC, Bournonville L, et al. Expansion microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid. PLOS Biol 2021; 19 : e3001020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tosetti N, Dos Santos Pacheco N, Bertiaux E, et al. Essential function of the alveolin network in the subpellicular microtubules and conoid assembly in Toxoplasma gondii. eLife 2020; 9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Amodeo S, Kalichava A, Fradera-Sola A, et al. Characterization of the novel mitochondrial genome segregation factor TAP110 in Trypanosoma brucei. J Cell Sci 2021; 134 : jcs254300. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dos Santos Pacheco N, Tosetti N, Krishnan A, et al. Revisiting the Role of Toxoplasma gondii ERK7 in the Maintenance and Stability of the Apical Complex. mBio 2021; 12 : e0205721. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liffner B, Absalon S. Expansion Microscopy Reveals Plasmodium falciparum Blood-Stage Parasites Undergo Anaphase with A Chromatin Bridge in the Absence of Mini-Chromosome Maintenance Complex Binding Protein. Microorganisms 2021; 9 : 2306. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lentini G, Ben Chaabene R, Vadas O, et al. Structural insights into an atypical secretory pathway kinase crucial for Toxoplasma gondii invasion. Nat Commun 2021; 12 : 3788. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Alonso VL. Ultrastructure Expansion Microscopy (U-ExM) in Trypanosoma cruzi: localization of tubulin isoforms and isotypes. Parasitol Res 2022; 121 : 3019–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vigetti L, Labouré T, Roumégous C, et al. The BCC7 Protein Contributes to the Toxoplasma Basal Pole by Interfacing between the MyoC Motor and the IMC Membrane Network. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23 : 5995. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pavlou G, Touquet B, Vigetti L, et al. Coupling Polar Adhesion with Traction, Spring, and Torque Forces Allows High-Speed Helical Migration of the Protozoan Parasite Toxoplasma. ACS Nano 2020; 14 : 7121–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomasina R, Gonzalez FC, Martins-Duarte ÉS, et al. Separate To Operate: the Centriole-Free Inner Core of the Centrosome Regulates the Assembly of the Intranuclear Spindle in Toxoplasma gondii. mBio 2022; 13 : e0185922. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Louvel V, Haase R, Mercey O, et al. Nanoscopy of organelles and tissues with iterative ultrastructure expansion microscopy (iU-ExM). bioRxiv 2022; 2022.11.14.516383. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hinterndorfer K, Laporte MH, Mikus F, et al. Ultrastructure Expansion Microscopy reveals the nanoscale cellular architecture of budding and fission yeast. J Cell Sci 2022; 135 : jcs260240. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Damstra HG, Mohar B, Eddison M, et al. Visualizing cellular and tissue ultrastructure using Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy (TREx). eLife 2022; 11. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chang JB, Chen F, Yoon YG, et al. Iterative expansion microscopy. Nat Methods 2017; 14 : 593–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.