Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 34, Number 5, Mai 2018
Page(s) 473 - 479
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20183405022
Published online 13 June 2018
  1. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Seven myths and realities about do-It- yourself biology. Washington, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlson R. Splice it yourself: Who needs a geneticist? Build your own DNA lab. Wired Magazine 2005; 13/5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Meyer M. Domesticating and democratizing science: a geography of do-it-yourself biology. J Material Culture 2013 ; 18 : 117–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ledford H. Life hackers. Nature 2010 ; 467 : 650–652. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meyer M. Hacking life? The politics and poetics of DIY biology. In: Bureaud A, Malina RF, Whiteley L, eds. Meta-life. biotechnologies, synthetic biology, life and the arts. Cambridge : Leonardo and MIT Press, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagnolini G. Participation et légitimité dans la science, le cas du biohacking. Actes des 4es journées doctorales sur la participation du public et la démocratie participative. Novembre 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Greene JA. Do-it-yourself medical devices: technology and empowerment in American health care. N Engl J Med 2016 ; 374 : 305–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jwa A. Early adopters of the magical thinking cap: a study on do-it-yourself (DIY) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) user community. J Law Biosci 2015 ; 2 : 292–335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee JM, Hirschfeld E, Wedding J. A patient-designed do-it-yourself mobile technology system for diabetes: promise and challenges for a new era in medicine. JAMA 2016 ; 315 : 1447–1448. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. http://www.makery.info/2016/03/29/echopen-lance-une-sonde-dechographie-open-source/. [Google Scholar]
  11. http://www.echopen.org. [Google Scholar]
  12. http://www.epidemium.cc. [Google Scholar]
  13. Meyer M. Amateurization and re-materialization in biology: opening up scientific equipment. In : Wienroth M., Rodrigues E, eds. Knowing new biotechnologies. Social aspects of technological convergence. London : Routledge, 2015 : 142–157. [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith TSJ. Of makerspaces and hacklabs: emergence, experiment and ontological theatre at the Edinburgh HACKLAB. Scotland. Scottish Geographical J 2017 ; 133 : 130–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meyer M. Steve Jobs, terrorists, gentlemen and punks: tracing strange comparisons of biohackers. In : Deville J, Guggenheim M, Hrdlickova Z, eds. Practising comparison: logics, relations, collaborations. London : Mattering Press : 2016 ; 281–305. [Google Scholar]
  16. Delfanti A. 2014. Is DIYbio being co-opted by institutions? In: Bureaud A, Malina RF, Whiteley L, eds. Meta-life. Biotechologies, synthetic biology, life and the arts. Cambridge : Leonardo and MIT Press, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Delfanti A, Söderberg J. Repurposing the hacker: three cycles of recuperation in the evolution of hacking and capitalism. Ephemera. Theory and Politics in Organization 2018. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9c86493g. [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer M Wilbanks R. Entre le garage, le public et le marché : valuations de la biologie do-it-yourself. In : Leclerc O, ed. Savants, artistes, citoyens : tous créateurs ?. Québec : Éditions Science et Bien Commun. 2017 : 113–136. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.