Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 34, Number 5, Mai 2018
Page(s) 464 - 472
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20183405021
Published online 13 June 2018
  1. Le Corvol P. médecin chercheur, une espèce en voie d’évolution. Med Sci (Paris) 2015 ; 31 : 351–352. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wyngaarden JB. The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med 1979 ; 301 : 1254–1259. [Google Scholar]
  3. The Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group. 2014 Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group Report. 2014. https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/PSW_Report_ACD_06042014.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brass LF, Akabas MH, Burnley LD, et al. Are MD-PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD-PhD programs. Acad Med 2010 ; 85 : 692–701. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lamour V, Bessereau JL, Thalabard JC, et al. Le réseau national des filières médecine-sciences. Med Sci (Paris) 2018 ; 34 : 462–463. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FACTS: Applicants, matriculants, enrollment, graduates, MD/PhD, and residency applicants data - Data and Analysis – AAMC. https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaillard R. Rapport Gaillard. Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, 2011. http://media.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/file/Sante_-_secteur_hospitalier/53/6/Rapport_Gaillard_175536.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  8. Inspection générale des affaires sociales, Inspection générale de l’administration de l’éducation nationale et de la recherche. Le post-internat Constats et propositions, 2010. http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/104000383.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  9. Postes de CCA-Inserm-Bettencourt. https://rh.inserm.fr/actualites/Pages/detail.aspx?news_id=53. [Google Scholar]
  10. National MD-PhD program outcomes study, April 2018. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/AAMC-National-MDPhD-Program-Outcomes-Study-2018.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.