EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 27 / No 11 (Novembre 2011) Med Sci (Paris), 27 11 (2011) 1000-1008 References
Imagerie et cognition
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 27, Number 11, Novembre 2011
Imagerie et cognition
Page(s) 1000 - 1008
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/201127111000
Published online 30 November 2011
  1. Laan LN van der, Ridder DTD de, Viergever MA, et al. The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. NeuroImage 2011 ; 55 : 55296–55303. [Google Scholar]
  2. Simmons WK, Martin A, Barsalou LW. Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cereb Cortex 2005 ; 15 : 1602–1608. [Google Scholar]
  3. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci 2010 ; 33 : 61–135. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett CM, Miller MB. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann NY Acad Sci 2010 ; 1191 : 133–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of game and economic behavior. Princeton NJ : Princeton University Press, 1944. [Google Scholar]
  6. Savage LG. The foundations of statistics. New York : Dover Publications, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  7. Luce RD, Raiffa H. Games and decisions. New York : Wiley and Sons, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  8. Samuelson PA. A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica 1938 ; 5 : 61–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Oullier O, Basso F. Embodied economics: how bodily information shapes the social coordination dynamics of decision-making. Philos T Roy Soc B 2010 ; 365 : 291–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Joule RV, Beauvois JL. La soumission librement consentie. Paris : PUF, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Huguet P, Dumas F, Monteil JM. Competing for a desired reward in the stroop task : when attentional control is unconscious but effective versus conscious but ineffective. Can J Exp Psychol 2004 ; 58 : 153–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Eco 1955 ; 69 : 99–118. [Google Scholar]
  13. Park CW. A seven-point scale and a decision maker’s simplifying strategy: an operationalized satisficing-plus model. Organ Behav Hum Perf 1978 ; 21 : 252–271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Beach LR, Mitchell TR. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Acad Manag Rev 1978 ; 3 : 439–449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Christensen-Szalanski JJ. A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: the effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes. Organ Behav Hum Perf 1980 ; 25 : 107–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart J Econ 1961 ; 75 : 643–669. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974 ; 185 : 1124–1131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979 ; 47 : 263–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. J Econ Lit 2005 ; 43 : 9–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sanfey AG, Loewenstein G, McClure SM, et al. Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci 2006 ; 10 : 108–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Glimcher PW. Foundations of neuroeconomic analysis. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Oullier O, Kelso JAS. Neuroeconomics and the metastable brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2006 ; 10 : 353–354. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacol 2010 ; 35 : 4–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Telang F, et al. Exposure to appetitive food stimuli markedly activates the human brain. Neuroimage 2004 ; 21 : 1790–1797. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hervé D, Matamales M, Stipanovich A, et al. Un nouveau mécanisme par lequel la récompense et les drogues modifient la chromatine dans les neurones. Med Sci (Paris) 2008 ; 24 : 1027–1029. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Knutson B, Peterson R. Neurally reconstructing expected utility. Game Econ Behav 2005 ; 52 : 305–315. [Google Scholar]
  27. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 1997 ; 275 : 1593–1599. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Camerer CF. Wanting, liking, and learning: neuroscience and paternalism. U Chicago Law Rev 2006 ; 73 : 87–110. [Google Scholar]
  29. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci 2003 ; 26 : 507–513. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Berridge KC. The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology 2007 ; 191 : 391–431. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev 1998 ; 28 : 309–369. [Google Scholar]
  32. Brauer LH, Cramblett MJ, Paxton DA, et al. Haloperidol reduces smoking of both nicotine-containing and denicotinized cigarettes. Psychopharmacologia 2001 ; 159 : 31–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Evans AH, Pavese N, Lawrence AD, et al. Compulsive drug use linked to sensitized ventral striatal dopamine transmission. Ann Neurol 2006 ; 59 : 852–858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Voon V, Pessiglione M, Brezing C, et al. Mechanisms underlying dopamine-mediated reward bias in compulsive behaviors. Neuron 2010 ; 65 : 135–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Finlayson G, King N, Blundell J. The role of implicit wanting in relation to explicit liking and wanting for food: Implications for appetite control. Appetite 2008 ; 50 : 120–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 1984 ; 39 : 341–350. [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith K, Dickhaut J, McCabe K, et al. Neuronal substrates for choice under ambiguity, risk, gains, and losses. Manage Sci 2002 ; 48 : 711–718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Damasio AR. Descartes’ Error. New York : Putnam. Trad. fr. de M. Blanc. L’erreur de Descartes. La raison des émotions. Paris : Odile Jacob, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  39. Laibson DI, Repetto A, Tobacman J. Self control and retirement savings. Brook Papers Econ Act 1998 ; 1 : 91–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, et al. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 2004 ; 306 : 503–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cohen L. Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci 1998 ; 21 : 355–361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Plassmann H, O’Doherty J, Rangel A. Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. J Neurosci 2007 ; 27 : 9984–9988. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Plassmann H, O’Doherty JP, Rangel A. Appetitive and aversive goal values are encoded in the medial orbitofrontal cortex at the time of decision making. J Neurosci 2010 ; 30 : 10799–10808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Berridge KC. ‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiol Behav 2009 ; 97 : 537–550. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stice E, Spoor S, Bohon C, et al. Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Abnorm Psychol 2008 ; 117 : 924–935. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Davis C, Strachan S, Berkson M. Sensitivity to reward: implications for overeating and overweight. Appetite 2004 ; 42 : 131–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weller RE, Cook III EW,, Avsar KB, et al. Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite 2008 ; 51 : 563–569. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hare TA, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 2009 ; 324 : 646–648. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, et al. Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors. Neuroimage 2008 ; 42 : 1537–1543. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Walther K, Birdsill AC, Glisky EL, et al. Structural brain differences and cognitive functioning related to body mass index in older females. Hum Brain Mapp 2010 ; 31 : 1052–1064. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET, Bilderbeck A. How cognition modulates affective responses to taste and flavor: top-down influences on the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortices. Cereb Cortex 2008 ; 18 : 1549–1559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Passamonti L, Rowe JB, Schwarzbauer C, et al. Personality predicts the brain’s response to viewing appetizing foods: the neural basis of a risk factor for overeating. J Neurosci 2009 ; 29 : 43–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Oullier O, Sauneron S. Nouvelles approches de la prévention en santé publique : l’apport des sciences comportementales, cognitives et des neurosciences (Rapport n°25 du Centre d’analyse stratégique). Paris : La Documentation Française, 2010 : 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  54. Oullier O, Kirman AP, Kelso JAS. The coordination dynamics of economic decision making: a multilevel approach to social neuroeconomics. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng 2008 ; 16 : 557–571. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Oullier O. The useful brain : Why neuroeconomics might change our views on rationality and a couple of other things. In: Michel-Kerjan E, Slovic P, eds. The irrational economist : making decisions in a dangerous world. New York : Public Affairs, 88–96. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.