Imagerie et cognition
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 27, Numéro 11, Novembre 2011
Imagerie et cognition
Page(s) 1000 - 1008
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/201127111000
Publié en ligne 30 novembre 2011
  1. Laan LN van der, Ridder DTD de, Viergever MA, et al. The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. NeuroImage 2011 ; 55 : 55296–55303. [Google Scholar]
  2. Simmons WK, Martin A, Barsalou LW. Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cereb Cortex 2005 ; 15 : 1602–1608. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci 2010 ; 33 : 61–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett CM, Miller MB. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann NY Acad Sci 2010 ; 1191 : 133–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of game and economic behavior. Princeton NJ : Princeton University Press, 1944. [Google Scholar]
  6. Savage LG. The foundations of statistics. New York : Dover Publications, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  7. Luce RD, Raiffa H. Games and decisions. New York : Wiley and Sons, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  8. Samuelson PA. A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica 1938 ; 5 : 61–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Oullier O, Basso F. Embodied economics: how bodily information shapes the social coordination dynamics of decision-making. Philos T Roy Soc B 2010 ; 365 : 291–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Joule RV, Beauvois JL. La soumission librement consentie. Paris : PUF, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. Huguet P, Dumas F, Monteil JM. Competing for a desired reward in the stroop task : when attentional control is unconscious but effective versus conscious but ineffective. Can J Exp Psychol 2004 ; 58 : 153–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Eco 1955 ; 69 : 99–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Park CW. A seven-point scale and a decision maker’s simplifying strategy: an operationalized satisficing-plus model. Organ Behav Hum Perf 1978 ; 21 : 252–271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Beach LR, Mitchell TR. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Acad Manag Rev 1978 ; 3 : 439–449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Christensen-Szalanski JJ. A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: the effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes. Organ Behav Hum Perf 1980 ; 25 : 107–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart J Econ 1961 ; 75 : 643–669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974 ; 185 : 1124–1131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979 ; 47 : 263–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. J Econ Lit 2005 ; 43 : 9–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sanfey AG, Loewenstein G, McClure SM, et al. Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci 2006 ; 10 : 108–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Glimcher PW. Foundations of neuroeconomic analysis. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Oullier O, Kelso JAS. Neuroeconomics and the metastable brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2006 ; 10 : 353–354. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacol 2010 ; 35 : 4–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Telang F, et al. Exposure to appetitive food stimuli markedly activates the human brain. Neuroimage 2004 ; 21 : 1790–1797. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hervé D, Matamales M, Stipanovich A, et al. Un nouveau mécanisme par lequel la récompense et les drogues modifient la chromatine dans les neurones. Med Sci (Paris) 2008 ; 24 : 1027–1029. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Knutson B, Peterson R. Neurally reconstructing expected utility. Game Econ Behav 2005 ; 52 : 305–315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 1997 ; 275 : 1593–1599. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Camerer CF. Wanting, liking, and learning: neuroscience and paternalism. U Chicago Law Rev 2006 ; 73 : 87–110. [Google Scholar]
  29. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci 2003 ; 26 : 507–513. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Berridge KC. The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology 2007 ; 191 : 391–431. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev 1998 ; 28 : 309–369. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Brauer LH, Cramblett MJ, Paxton DA, et al. Haloperidol reduces smoking of both nicotine-containing and denicotinized cigarettes. Psychopharmacologia 2001 ; 159 : 31–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Evans AH, Pavese N, Lawrence AD, et al. Compulsive drug use linked to sensitized ventral striatal dopamine transmission. Ann Neurol 2006 ; 59 : 852–858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Voon V, Pessiglione M, Brezing C, et al. Mechanisms underlying dopamine-mediated reward bias in compulsive behaviors. Neuron 2010 ; 65 : 135–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Finlayson G, King N, Blundell J. The role of implicit wanting in relation to explicit liking and wanting for food: Implications for appetite control. Appetite 2008 ; 50 : 120–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 1984 ; 39 : 341–350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith K, Dickhaut J, McCabe K, et al. Neuronal substrates for choice under ambiguity, risk, gains, and losses. Manage Sci 2002 ; 48 : 711–718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Damasio AR. Descartes’ Error. New York : Putnam. Trad. fr. de M. Blanc. L’erreur de Descartes. La raison des émotions. Paris : Odile Jacob, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  39. Laibson DI, Repetto A, Tobacman J. Self control and retirement savings. Brook Papers Econ Act 1998 ; 1 : 91–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, et al. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 2004 ; 306 : 503–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cohen L. Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci 1998 ; 21 : 355–361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Plassmann H, O’Doherty J, Rangel A. Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. J Neurosci 2007 ; 27 : 9984–9988. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Plassmann H, O’Doherty JP, Rangel A. Appetitive and aversive goal values are encoded in the medial orbitofrontal cortex at the time of decision making. J Neurosci 2010 ; 30 : 10799–10808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Berridge KC. ‘Liking’ and ‘wanting’ food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiol Behav 2009 ; 97 : 537–550. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stice E, Spoor S, Bohon C, et al. Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Abnorm Psychol 2008 ; 117 : 924–935. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Davis C, Strachan S, Berkson M. Sensitivity to reward: implications for overeating and overweight. Appetite 2004 ; 42 : 131–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weller RE, Cook III EW,, Avsar KB, et al. Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite 2008 ; 51 : 563–569. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hare TA, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 2009 ; 324 : 646–648. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, et al. Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors. Neuroimage 2008 ; 42 : 1537–1543. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Walther K, Birdsill AC, Glisky EL, et al. Structural brain differences and cognitive functioning related to body mass index in older females. Hum Brain Mapp 2010 ; 31 : 1052–1064. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET, Bilderbeck A. How cognition modulates affective responses to taste and flavor: top-down influences on the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortices. Cereb Cortex 2008 ; 18 : 1549–1559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Passamonti L, Rowe JB, Schwarzbauer C, et al. Personality predicts the brain’s response to viewing appetizing foods: the neural basis of a risk factor for overeating. J Neurosci 2009 ; 29 : 43–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Oullier O, Sauneron S. Nouvelles approches de la prévention en santé publique : l’apport des sciences comportementales, cognitives et des neurosciences (Rapport n°25 du Centre d’analyse stratégique). Paris : La Documentation Française, 2010 : 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  54. Oullier O, Kirman AP, Kelso JAS. The coordination dynamics of economic decision making: a multilevel approach to social neuroeconomics. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng 2008 ; 16 : 557–571. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Oullier O. The useful brain : Why neuroeconomics might change our views on rationality and a couple of other things. In: Michel-Kerjan E, Slovic P, eds. The irrational economist : making decisions in a dangerous world. New York : Public Affairs, 88–96. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.