EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 27 / No 8-9 (Août–Septembre 2011) Med Sci (Paris), 27 8-9 (2011) 707-709 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 27, Number 8-9, Août–Septembre 2011
Page(s) 707 - 709
Section Nouvelles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2011278011
Published online 31 August 2011
  1. Durkin SG, Glover TW. Chromosome fragile sites. Annu Rev Genet 2007 ; 41 : 169-192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arlt MF, Durkin SG, Ragland RL, Glover TW. Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006 ; 5 : 1126-1135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bignell GR, Greenman CD, Davies H, et al. Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature 2010 ; 463 : 893-898. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. Genomic instability : an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010 ; 11 : 220-228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Letessier A, Millot GA, Koundrioukoff S, et al. Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site. Nature 2011 ; 470 : 120-123. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Le Beau MM, Rassool FV, Neilly ME, et al. Replication of a common fragile site, FRA3B, occurs late in S phase and is delayed further upon induction : implications for the mechanism of fragile site induction. Hum Mol Genet 1998 ; 7 : 755-761. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schwartz M, Zlotorynski E, Kerem B. The molecular basis of common and rare fragile sites. Cancer Lett 2006 ; 232 : 13-26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Helmrich A, Stout-Weider K, Hermann K, et al. Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes. Genome Res 2006 ; 16 : 1222-1230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Palumbo E, Matricardi L, Tosoni E, et al. Replication dynamics at common fragile site FRA6E. Chromosoma 2010 ; 119 : 575-587. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zanesi N, Fidanza V, Fong LY, et al. The tumor spectrum in FHIT-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 ; 98 : 10250-10255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grégoire D, Brodolin K, Méchali M. HoxB domain induction silences DNA replication origins in the locus and specifies a single origin at its boundary. EMBO Rep 2006 ; 7 : 812-816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dazy S, Gandrillon O, Hyrien O, Prioleau MN. Broadening of DNA replication origin usage during metazoan cell differentiation. EMBO Rep 2006 ; 7 : 806-811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansen RS, Thomas S, Sandstrom R, et al. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 ; 107 : 139-144. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hiratani I, Ryba T, Itoh M, et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol 2008 ; 6 : e245. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sutherland GR. Fragile sites on human chromosomes: demonstration of their dependence on the type of tissue culture medium. Science 1977 ; 197 : 265-266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.