EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 39 / No 6-7 (Juin-Juillet 2023) Med Sci (Paris), 39 6-7 (2023) 551-557 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 39, Number 6-7, Juin-Juillet 2023
Page(s) 551 - 557
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023077
Published online 30 June 2023
  1. Papon S. Bilan démographique 2021. Insee Prem 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moisy M. Les Français vivent plus longtemps, mais leur espérance de vie en bonne santé reste stable. Dir Rech Études Lévaluation Stat 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fontaine R, Pennec S. Les inégalités sociales dans la vieillesse. Gérontologie Société 2020; 42/162 : 19–36. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cambois E, Jusot F. Ampleur, tendance et causes des inégalités sociales de santé et de mortalité en Europe : une revue des études comparatives. Numéro thématique. Les inégalités sociales de santé en France en 2006: éléments de l’état des lieux. Bull Epidemiol Hebd 2007; 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilgenkrantz S. Les inégalités sociales face à la mortalité et aux incapacités. Med Sci (Paris) 2008 ; 24 : 415–418. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feinstein JS The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Milbank Q 1993 ; 71 : 279–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arrighi Y, Rapp T, Sirven N. The impact of economic conditions on the disablement process: A Markov transition approach using SHARE data. Health Policy Amst Neth 2017 ; 121 : 778–785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. OECD. Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, et al. Health, functioning and disability in older adults – current status and future implications. Lancet 2015 ; 385 : 563–575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Räsänen P, Roine E, Sintonen H, et al. Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: A systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006 ; 22 : 235–241. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Stein C, et al. Systematic review of general burden of disease studies using disability-adjusted life years. Popul Health Metr 2012 ; 10 : 21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396 : 1204–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, et al. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015 ; 112 : E4104–E4110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jia L, Zhang W, Chen X. Common methods of biological age estimation. Clin Interv Aging 2017 ; 12 : 759–772. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jusot F. L’évolution favorable de l’espérance de vie correspond-elle à une augmentation du bien-être lié à la santé ?. Med Sci (Paris) 2016 ; 32 : 231–232. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rapp T, Ronchetti J, Sicsic J. Where Are Populations Aging Better? A Global Comparison of Healthy Aging Across Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2022; 25 : 1520–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grossman M. On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health. J Polit Econ 1972 ; 80 : 223–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ravesteijn B, van Kippersluis H, van Doorslaer E. The wear and tear on health: What is the role of occupation?. Health Econ 2018 ; 27 : e69–e86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Juster FT, Suzman R. An Overview of the Health and Retirement Study. J Hum Resour 1995 ; 30 : S7–S56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. The SHARE sampling procedures and calibrated design weights. The survey of health, aging, and retirement in europe-methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA) : Börsch-Supan A, Jürges J, 2005 : pp. 28–69. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sicsic J, Rapp T. Frailty transitions and health care use in Europe. Health Serv Res 2019 ; 54 : 1305–1315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee J, Phillips D, Wilkens J, et al. Cross-Country Comparisons of Disability and Morbidity: Evidence from the Gateway to Global Aging Data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2018 ; 73 : 1519–1524. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wagstaff A. The demand for health: An empirical reformulation of the Grossman model. Health Econ 1993 ; 2 : 189–198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kenkel DS. The demand for preventive medical care. Appl Econ 1994 ; 26 : 313–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Contoyannis P, Jones AM, Rice N. The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey. J Appl Econom 2004 ; 19 : 473–503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rapp T, Ronchetti J, Sicsic J. Are long-term care jobs harmful? Evidence from Germany. Eur J Health Econ Health Econ Prev Care 2021; 22 : 749–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001 ; 56 : M146–M156. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004 ; 59 : 255–263. [Google Scholar]
  29. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, et al. Progress in development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist 1970 ; 10 : 20–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Graf C. The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. AJN Am J Nurs 2008 ; 108 : 52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jürges H. True health vs response styles: Exploring cross-country differences in self-reported health. Health Econ 2007 ; 16 : 163–178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bernabei R, Landi F, Calvani R, et al. Multicomponent intervention to prevent mobility disability in frail older adults: randomised controlled trial (SPRINTT project). BMJ 2022; 377 : e068788. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Landi F, Cesari M, Calvani R, et al. The “Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies” (SPRINTT) randomized controlled trial: design and methods. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017 ; 29 : 89–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Levine ME. Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age?. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013 ; 68 : 667–674. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sirven N, Dumontet M, Rapp T. The dynamics of frailty and change in socio-economic conditions: evidence for the 65+ in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2020; 30 : 715–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Davies K, Maharani A, Chandola T, et al. The longitudinal relationship between loneliness, social isolation, and frailty in older adults in England: a prospective analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021; 2 : e70–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hashiguchi TCO, Llena-Nozal A. The effectiveness of social protection for long-term care in old age: Is social protection reducing the risk of poverty associated with care needs? Paris : OCDE, 2020. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.