EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 39 / Numéro 6-7 (Juin-Juillet 2023) Med Sci (Paris), 39 6-7 (2023) 551-557 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 39, Numéro 6-7, Juin-Juillet 2023
Page(s) 551 - 557
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023077
Publié en ligne 30 juin 2023
  1. Papon S. Bilan démographique 2021. Insee Prem 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moisy M. Les Français vivent plus longtemps, mais leur espérance de vie en bonne santé reste stable. Dir Rech Études Lévaluation Stat 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fontaine R, Pennec S. Les inégalités sociales dans la vieillesse. Gérontologie Société 2020; 42/162 : 19–36. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cambois E, Jusot F. Ampleur, tendance et causes des inégalités sociales de santé et de mortalité en Europe : une revue des études comparatives. Numéro thématique. Les inégalités sociales de santé en France en 2006: éléments de l’état des lieux. Bull Epidemiol Hebd 2007; 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilgenkrantz S. Les inégalités sociales face à la mortalité et aux incapacités. Med Sci (Paris) 2008 ; 24 : 415–418. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feinstein JS The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Milbank Q 1993 ; 71 : 279–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arrighi Y, Rapp T, Sirven N. The impact of economic conditions on the disablement process: A Markov transition approach using SHARE data. Health Policy Amst Neth 2017 ; 121 : 778–785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. OECD. Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, et al. Health, functioning and disability in older adults – current status and future implications. Lancet 2015 ; 385 : 563–575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Räsänen P, Roine E, Sintonen H, et al. Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: A systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006 ; 22 : 235–241. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Stein C, et al. Systematic review of general burden of disease studies using disability-adjusted life years. Popul Health Metr 2012 ; 10 : 21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396 : 1204–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, et al. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015 ; 112 : E4104–E4110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jia L, Zhang W, Chen X. Common methods of biological age estimation. Clin Interv Aging 2017 ; 12 : 759–772. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jusot F. L’évolution favorable de l’espérance de vie correspond-elle à une augmentation du bien-être lié à la santé ?. Med Sci (Paris) 2016 ; 32 : 231–232. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rapp T, Ronchetti J, Sicsic J. Where Are Populations Aging Better? A Global Comparison of Healthy Aging Across Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2022; 25 : 1520–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grossman M. On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health. J Polit Econ 1972 ; 80 : 223–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ravesteijn B, van Kippersluis H, van Doorslaer E. The wear and tear on health: What is the role of occupation?. Health Econ 2018 ; 27 : e69–e86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Juster FT, Suzman R. An Overview of the Health and Retirement Study. J Hum Resour 1995 ; 30 : S7–S56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. The SHARE sampling procedures and calibrated design weights. The survey of health, aging, and retirement in europe-methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA) : Börsch-Supan A, Jürges J, 2005 : pp. 28–69. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sicsic J, Rapp T. Frailty transitions and health care use in Europe. Health Serv Res 2019 ; 54 : 1305–1315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee J, Phillips D, Wilkens J, et al. Cross-Country Comparisons of Disability and Morbidity: Evidence from the Gateway to Global Aging Data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2018 ; 73 : 1519–1524. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wagstaff A. The demand for health: An empirical reformulation of the Grossman model. Health Econ 1993 ; 2 : 189–198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kenkel DS. The demand for preventive medical care. Appl Econ 1994 ; 26 : 313–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Contoyannis P, Jones AM, Rice N. The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey. J Appl Econom 2004 ; 19 : 473–503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rapp T, Ronchetti J, Sicsic J. Are long-term care jobs harmful? Evidence from Germany. Eur J Health Econ Health Econ Prev Care 2021; 22 : 749–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001 ; 56 : M146–M156. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004 ; 59 : 255–263. [Google Scholar]
  29. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, et al. Progress in development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist 1970 ; 10 : 20–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Graf C. The Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. AJN Am J Nurs 2008 ; 108 : 52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jürges H. True health vs response styles: Exploring cross-country differences in self-reported health. Health Econ 2007 ; 16 : 163–178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bernabei R, Landi F, Calvani R, et al. Multicomponent intervention to prevent mobility disability in frail older adults: randomised controlled trial (SPRINTT project). BMJ 2022; 377 : e068788. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Landi F, Cesari M, Calvani R, et al. The “Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies” (SPRINTT) randomized controlled trial: design and methods. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017 ; 29 : 89–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Levine ME. Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age?. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013 ; 68 : 667–674. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sirven N, Dumontet M, Rapp T. The dynamics of frailty and change in socio-economic conditions: evidence for the 65+ in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2020; 30 : 715–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Davies K, Maharani A, Chandola T, et al. The longitudinal relationship between loneliness, social isolation, and frailty in older adults in England: a prospective analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021; 2 : e70–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hashiguchi TCO, Llena-Nozal A. The effectiveness of social protection for long-term care in old age: Is social protection reducing the risk of poverty associated with care needs? Paris : OCDE, 2020. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.