Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Number 11, Novembre 2022
Page(s) 936 - 940
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2022147
Published online 30 November 2022
  1. Gayon J. La génétique est-elle encore une discipline ?. Med Sci (paris) 2004 ; 20 : 248–253. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sapp J. Beyond the Gene, Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York : Oxford University Press, 1987 : 266 p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Morange M. Quelle place pour l’épigénétique ? Med Sci (paris) 2005 ; 21 : 367–369. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Galef BG Jr., Laland KN. Social Learning in Animals : Empirical Studies and Theoretical Models. BioScience 2005 ; 55 : 489–499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilbert S, Sapp J, Tauber A. A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology 2012 ; 87 : 325–341. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Danchin E, Charmantier A, Champagne F et al. Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2011 ; 12 : 475–486. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Odling Smee J. Niche Inheritance. In: Pigliucci M, Müller G., eds. Evolution, the Extended Synthesis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2010 : pp. 175–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stotz K. Why developmental niche construction is not selective niche construction: and why it matters. Interface Focus 2017 ; 7 : 20160157. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Merlin F. Limited Extended Inheritance. In Walsh D, Huneman P, eds. Challenging the Modern Synthesis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017 : pp. 263–279. [Google Scholar]
  10. Heard E, Martienssen RA. Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance : Myths and Mechanisms. Cell 2014 ; 157 : 95–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pontarotti G. Environmental inheritance: conceptual ambiguities and epistemological issues. Biological Theory 2022; 17 : 36–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jablonka E, Lamb M. Evolution in Four Dimensions. Cambridge : MIT Press, 2005 : 472 p. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonduriansky R, Day T. Extended heredity: A New Understanding of Inheritance and Evolution, Princeton. NJ : Princeton University Press, 2018 : 288 p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Venkatachalam R, Ligtenberg MJ, Hoogerbrugge N, et al. The epigenetics of (hereditary) colorectal cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2010 ; 203 : 1–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Toth M. Mechanisms of Non-Genetic Inheritance and Psychiatric Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015 ; 40 : 129–140. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Beedle AS. Non-genomic transgenerational inheritance of disease risk. Bioessays 2007 ; 29 : 145–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Charles MA, Delpierre C, Bréant B. Le concept des origines développementales de la santé. Évolution sur trois décennies. Med Sci (Paris) 2016 ; 32 : 15–20. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Aiken CE, Ozanne SE. Transgenerational developmental programming. Hum Reprod Update 2014 ; 20 : 63–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vickers MH. Developmental programming and transgenerational transmission of obesity”. Ann Nutr Metab 2014 ; 64 (suppl 1) : 26–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jablonka E. Information: Its Interpretation, Its Inheritance and Its Sharing. Philosophy of science 2002 ; 69 : 578–605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oyama S. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 : 296 p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Griffiths PE, Stotz K. Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 : 270 p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pontarotti G. Extended Inheritance from an Organizational Point of View. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 2015 ; 37 : 430–448. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mossio M, Pontarotti G. Conserving Functions across Generations: Inheritance in Light of Biological Organization. Brit J Phil Sci 2020 : 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mameli M. The inheritance of features. Biology and Philosophy 2005 ; 20 : 365–399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Griesemer J. Le concept reproducteur. Med Sci (Paris) 2005 ; 21 : 1106–1111. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fox Keller E. The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000 : 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Champagne FA. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol 2008 ; 29 : 386–397. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Davis CD. The Gut Microbiome and Its Role in Obesity. Nutr Today 2016 ; 51 : 167–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Van der Lugt M, De Miramon. Penser l’hérédité au Moyen Âge : une introduction. In: van der Lugt M, de Miramon C, eds. L’hérédité entre Moyen Âge et Époque moderne. Perspectives historiques. Sismel - Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2008 : 3–37. [Google Scholar]
  31. Boyce WT, Sokolowski MB, Robinson GE. Toward a new biology of social adversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 ; 109 : 17143–17148. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Barr D. Introduction to Biosocial Medicine. Johns Hopkins University Press : 2016, 214 p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Meloni M, Müller R. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and social responsibility: perspectives from the social sciences. Environ Epigenet 2018; 4 : dvy019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Richardson S. The Maternal Imprint: The Contested Science of Maternal-Fetal Effects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021 : 376 p. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kirk SF, Penney TL, McHugh TL. Characterizing the obesogenic environment: the state of the evidence with directions for future research. Obes Rev 2010 ; 11 : 109–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In : Glanz K., Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: John Wiley and sons, 2008 : 464–485. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.