Open Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Number 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2022
Page(s) 594 - 599
Section Repères
Published online 29 June 2022
  1. Jullien D. Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 2018; 36C : 119–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. MurayamaH, FujiwaraY, KawachiI. Social capital and health: A review of prospective multilevel studies. Journal of Epidemiology 2012 ; 22 : 179–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GlaeserE, LaibsonD, ScheinkmanJ, SoutterC. Measuring Trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2000 ; 115 : 811–846. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. KarlanDS. Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. American Economic Review 2005 ; 95 : 1688–1699. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. FehrE.. On the Economics and Biology of Trust. Journal of the European Economic Association 2009 ; 7 : 235–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. BergJ, DickhautJ, McCabeK. Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 1995 ; 10 : 122–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. AjzenI.. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 1991 ; 50 : 179–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. GrossmanM.. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political economy 1972 ; 80 : 223–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. LamiraudK, GeoffardP. Therapeutic non-adherence: a rational behavior revealing patient preferences?. Health economics 2007 ; 16 : 1185–1204. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. CostaD, KahnM. Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association 2013 ; 11 : 680–702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied Choice Analysis. Cambridge : University Press, 2nd edition, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Bekker-GrobEW, RyanM, GerardK. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health economics 2012 ; 21 : 145–172. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GneezyU, PottersJ. An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997 ; 112 : 631–645. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. AndreoniJ, SprengerC. Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets. American Economic Review 2012 ; 102 : 3333–3356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. MurphyRO, AckermannKA, HandgraafM. Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision making 2011 ; 6 : 771–781. [Google Scholar]
  16. DohmenT, FalkA, HuffmanD, et al. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 2011 ; 9 : 522–550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. BrownKW, RichardMR. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology 2003 ; 84 : 822. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rafaï I, Blayac T, Dubois D, et al. Stated Preferences Outperform Elicited Preferences for Predicting Compliance with COVID-19 Prophylactic Measures. 2022, [Google Scholar]
  19. Galasso V, Pons V, Profeta P, et al. Gender differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behavior: Panel evidence from eight countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117 : 27285–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Szabo A, Ábel K, Boros S. Attitudes toward COVID-19 and stress levels in Hungary: Effects of age, perceived health status, and gender. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 2020; 12 : 572. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Blayac T, Dubois D, Duchêne S, et al. Population preferences for inclusive COVID-19 policy responses. Lancet Public Health 2021 : 6 : e9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Blayac T, Dubois D, Duchêne S, et al. Designing acceptable anti-COVID-19 policies by taking into account individuals’ preferences: evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  23. ChenY, FangwenL, JinanZ. Social comparisons, status and driving behavior. Journal of Public Economics 2017 ; 155 : 11–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Blayac T, Dubois D, Duchêne S, et al. Nudging for lockdown: behavioural insights from an online experiment. 2022. (À paraître dans Social Psychology). [Google Scholar]
  25. Kabat-ZinnJ.. Where you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York, NY: Hyperion, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  26. HertwigR, WulffDU, MataR. Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference. Phil Trans R Soc B 2019 ; 374 : 20180140. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. MoriskyDE, GreenLW, LevineDM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986 ; 24 : 67–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Crainich D. Les incitations financières à la réalisation d’objectifs comportementaux liés à la santé - État des lieux et questions en suspens. Med Sci (Paris) 2022; 38 : 198–204. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.