EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 38 / No 2 (Février 2022) Med Sci (Paris), 38 2 (2022) 211-214 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Number 2, Février 2022
Page(s) 211 - 214
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2021261
Published online 18 February 2022
  1. Roberts LW. Informed consent and the capacity for voluntarism. Am J Psychiatry 2002 ; 159 : 705–712. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Moodley K, Pather M, Myer L. Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa. J Med Ethics 2005 ; 31 : 727–732. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bobet R., Bourguignon O. Consentement et pratiques psychologiques. La pratique du psychologue et l’éthique. Belgique: Mardaga, 2009: 13–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Freedman B.. A moral Theory of Informed Consent. Hastings Cent Rep 1975 ; 5 : 32–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Py J. Éthique et déontologie dans les sciences du comportement. Communication présentée au colloque recherche, éthique et déontologie, Grenoble, 25 avril 2008. http://www.sfpsy.org/IMG/pdf/Conference-Ethique-Grenoble-25avril2008.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  6. Darley JM, Fasio RH. Expectancy Confirmation Processes Arising in the Social Interaction Sequence. Am Psychol 1980 ; 35 : 867–881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geldenhuys H.. Applied Ethics in Transpersonal and Humanistic Research. Humanist Psycholo 2019 ; 47 : 112–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nuremberg Code. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law (n° 10, vol. 2). Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office, 1947. [Google Scholar]
  9. World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA 2013 ; 310 : 2191–2194. [Google Scholar]
  10. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (NCPHSBBR). The Belmont report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  11. Donagan A.. Informed consent in therapy and experimentation. J Med Philos 1977 ; 2 : 318–329. [Google Scholar]
  12. Drenth PJD. Science: where do we draw the line?. Eur Rev 1999 ; 7 : 239–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?. J Am Med Assoc 2000 ; 283 : 2701–2711. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dengenholtz HB, Parker LS, Reynolds CF. Trial Design and Informed Consent for Clinic-Based Study With a Treatment as Usual Control Arm. Ethics Behav 2002 ; 12 : 43–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. American Psychological Association. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, 2017. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/. [Google Scholar]
  16. Katz J.. Human experimentation and human rights. St. Louis Univ Law J 1994 ; 38 : 7–54. [Google Scholar]
  17. Capron AM. Ethical and human rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity. N Engl J Med 1999 ; 340 : 1430–1434. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, et al. Intervention to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review. Med Decis Making 2010 ; 31 : 151–173. [Google Scholar]
  19. Berger LK, Begun AL, Otto-Salaj LL. Participant recruitment in intervention research: scientific integrity and cost-effective strategies. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2009 ; 12 : 79–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Code de déontologie des psychologues. Actualisation du Code de déontologie des psychologues de mars 1996, 2012. http://www.codededeontologiedespsychologues.fr/LE-CODE.html. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dresser R.. Mentally Disabled Research Subjects. J Am Med Assoc 1996 ; 276 : 67–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Annas GJ. The Changing Landscape of Human Experimentation: Nuremberg. Helsinki and Beyond. Health Matrix 1992 ; 2 : 119–140. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rage-Andrieu V, Hirsch F. Les Comités de protection des personnes : le maillon éthique de l’encadrement de la recherche clinique française. Med Sci (Paris) 2021; 37 : 660–2. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Duplain-Laferrière F, Lapointe G, Noël V, Bouffard G, et al. Analyse rétrospective de l’utilisation des réseaux sociaux pour le recrutement d’adolescent(e)s atteints de NF1, de femmes enceintes, de chercheurs/euses fondamentalistes et de médecins. In: A Marin, B Eysermann, MT Giroux eds. Recrutement et consentement à la recherche : réalités et défis éthiques, actes du colloque « Consentez-vous (toujours) à participer à ma recherche ? » : processus d’obtention et de renouvellement du consentement auprès de personnes vulnérables (ACFAS, 2015). Canada : université de Sherbrooke, 2018 : 178–202. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.