Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 31, Number 5, Mai 2015
Page(s) 515 - 521
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20153105013
Published online 09 June 2015
  1. Pugach MK, Gibson CW. Analysis of enamel development using murine model systems: approaches and limitations. Front Physiol 2014 ; 5 : 313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Margolis HC, Kwak SY, Yamazaki H. Role of mineralization inhibitors in the regulation of hard tissue biomineralization: relevance to initial enamel formation and maturation. Front Physiol 2014 ; 5 : 339. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu JC, Yamakoshi Y, Yamakoshi F, et al. Proteomics and genetics of dental enamel. Cells Tissues Organs 2005 ; 181 : 219–231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Martinez-Avila O, Wu S, Kim SJ, et al. Self-assembly of filamentous amelogenin requires calcium and phosphate: from dimers via nanoribbons to fibrils. Biomacromolecules 2012 ; 13 : 3494–3502. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brookes SJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Robinson C, et al. Intracellular nanosphere subunit assembly as revealed by amelogenin molecular cross-linking studies. Eur J Oral Sci 2006 ; 114 : 280–286. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Du C, Falini G, Fermani S, et al. Supramolecular assembly of amelogenin nanospheres into birefringent microribbons. Science 2005 ; 307 : 1450–1454. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Margolis HC, Beniash E, Fowler CE. Role of macromolecular assembly of enamel matrix proteins in enamel formation. J Dent Res 2006 ; 82 : 775–793. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paine ML, Snead ML. Protein interactions during assembly of the enamel organic extracellular matrix. J Bone Miner Res 1997 ; 12 : 221–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haruyama N, Hatakeyama J, Moriyama K, Kulkarni AB. Amelogenins: multi-functional enamel matrix proteins and their binding partners. J Oral Biosci 2011 ; 53 : 257–266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitani K, Haruyama N, Hatakeyama J, Igarashi K. Amelogenin splice isoforms stimulate chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells. Oral Dis 2013 ; 19 : 169–179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacques J, Hotton D, De la Dure-Molla M, et al. Tracking endogenous amelogenin and ameloblastin in vivo. PLoS One 2014 ; 94 : e99626. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacques J, Hotton D, Asselin A, et al. Ameloblastin as a putative marker of specific bone compartments. Connect Tissue Res 2014 ; 55 : 117–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Molla M, Descroix V, Aïoub M, et al. Enamel protein regulation and dental and periodontal physiopathology in MSX2 mutant mice. Am J Pathol 2010 ; 177 : 2516–2526. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dong X, Shen B, Ruan N, et al. Expression patterns of genes critical for BMP signaling pathway in developing human primary tooth germs. Histochem Cell Biol 2014 ; 6 : 657–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Michon F. Les cellules souches épithéliales dentaires exprimant Sox2 participent au renouvellement de l’incisive de souris. Med Sci (Paris) 2013 ; 4 : 341–342. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Simmer JP, Papagerakis P, Smith CE, et al. Regulation of dental enamel shape and hardness. J Dent Res 2010 ; 89 : 1024–1038. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robinson C. Enamel maturation: a brief background with implications for some enamel dysplasias. Front Physiol 2014 ; 5 : 388. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kawasaki K. The SCPP gene repertoire in bony vertebrates and graded differences in mineralized tissues. Dev Genes Evol 2009 ; 219 : 147–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Witkop CJ. Amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia revisited: problems in classification. J Oral Pathol 1988 ; 17 : 547–553. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Molla M, Bailleul-Forestier I, Artaud C, et al. Odontogénétique. EMC - Médecine buccale, 2008 : 44 p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Poulter JA, Murillo G, Brookes SJ, et al. Deletion of ameloblastin exon 6 is associated with amelogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mol Genet 2014 : 23 : 5317–5324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Salido EC, Yen PH, Koprivnikar K, et al. The human enamel protein gene amelogenin is expressed from both the X and the Y chromosomes. Am J Hum Genet 1992 ; 50 : 303–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Barron MJ, Brookes SJ, Kirkham J, et al. A mutation in the mouse Amelx tri-tyrosyl domain results in impaired secretion of amelogenin and phenocopies human X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mol Genet 2010 ; 19 : 1230–1247. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. De la Dure-Molla M, Quentric M, Yamaguti PM, et al. Pathognomonic oral profile of enamel renal syndrome (ERS) caused by recessive FAM20A mutations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014 ; 9 : 84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Houari S, Wurtz T, Ferbus D, et al. Asporin and the mineralization process in fluoride-treated rats. J Bone Miner Res 2014 ; 29 : 1446–1455. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Spira A. La prévention en France, 2004 : éléments de réflexion. Med Sci (Paris) 2004 ; 20 : 926–928. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jälevik B. Prevalence and diagnosis of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010 ; 11 : 59–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jedeon K, De la Dure-Molla M, Brookes SJ, et al. Enamel defects reflect perinatal exposure to bisphenol A. Am J Pathol 2013 ; 183 : 108–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jedeon K, Loiodice S, Marciano M, et al. Estrogen and bisphenol A affect male rat enamel formation and promote ameloblast proliferation. Endocrinology 2014 ; 155 : 3365–3375. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Varayoud J, Ramos JG, Bosquiazzo VL, et al. Neonatal exposure to bisphenol A alters rat uterine implantation-associated gene expression and reduces the number of implantation sites. Endocrinology 2011 ; 152 : 1101–1111. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. De Coster S, Van Larebeke N. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: associated disorders and mechanisms of action. J Environ Public Health 2012 ; 2012 : 713696. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wald T, Bednárová L, Osiˇcka R, et al. Biophysical characterization of recombinant human ameloblastin. Eur J Oral Sci 2011 ; 119 : 261–269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. He X, Wu S, Martinez-Avila O, et al. Self-aligning amelogenin nanoribbons in oil-water system. J Struct Biol 2011 ; 174 : 203–212. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fan Y, Sun Z, Wang R, et al. Enamel inspired nanocomposite fabrication through amelogenin supramolecular assembly. Biomaterials 2007 ; 28 : 3034–3042. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Haze A, Taylor AL, Haegewald S, et al. Regeneration of bone and periodontal ligament induced by recombinant amelogenin after periodontitis. J Cell Mol Med 2009 ; 13 : 1110–1124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Warotayanont R, Frenkel B, Snead ML, Zhou Y. Leucine-rich amelogenin peptide induces osteogenesis by activation of the Wnt pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009 ; 387 : 558–563. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hatakeyama J, Sreenath T, Hatakeyama Y, et al. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand-mediated osteoclastogenic pathway is elevated in amelogenin-null mice. J Biol Chem 2003 ; 278 : 35743–3578. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lu X, Ito Y, Kulkarni A, et al. Ameloblastin-rich enamel matrix favors short and randomly oriented apatite crystals. Eur J Oral Sci 2011 ; 119 : 254–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vowden P, Romanelli M, Peter R, et al. The effect of amelogenins (Xelma) on hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2006 ; 14 : 240–246. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.