Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 30, Number 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2014
Page(s) 688 - 692
Section Forum
Published online 11 July 2014
  1. Schrödinger E., What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge : The University Press, 1945. Qu’est-ce que la vie ? De la physique à la biologie, traduit de l’anglais par Léon Keffler. Paris : Seuil, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  2. Monod J., Le hasard et la nécessité : essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne, Paris : Éditions du Seuil, 1970. Chance and necessity: an essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology. New York : Knopf, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hull D., The Philosophy of biological science. Englewood Clifts NJ : Prentice Hall, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gilbert SF, Sarkar S. Embracing complexity: organicism for the 21st century. Dev Dyn 2000 ; 219 : 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization. J Biosci 2005 ; 30 : 103–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilbert SF. Mechanisms for the environmental regulation of gene expression: ecological aspects of animal development. J Biosci 2005 ; 30 : 65–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C, Miquel PA. On physicalism and downward causation in developmental and cancer biology. Acta Biotheor 2008 ; 56 : 257–274. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. The society of cells: cancer and control of cell proliferation. New York : Springer Verlag, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Theories of carcinogenesis: an emerging perspective. Semin Cancer Biol 2008 ; 18 : 372–377. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boveri T., The origin of malignant tumors. Baltimore. MD : Williams and Wilkins, 1929. [Google Scholar]
  11. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. One hundred years of somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: is it time to switch? BioEssays 2014 ; 36 : 118–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. Molecular biology of the cell, 5th ed. London : Garland Science, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory. BioEssays 2011 ; 33 : 332–340. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shih C, Shilo BZ, Goldfarb MP, et al. Passage of phenotypes of chemically transformed cells via transfection of DNA and chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979 ; 76 : 5714–5718. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Mermel CH, et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature 2014 ; 505 : 495–501. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith, R, et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature 2007 ; 446 : 153–158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Duncan AW, Hanlon Newell AE, Smith L, et al. Frequent aneuploidy among human hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 2011 ; 142 : 25–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yurov YB, Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, et al. Aneuploidy, confined chromosomal mosaicism in the developing human brain. PLoS One 2007 ; 2 : e558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mack SC, Witt H, Piro RM, et al. Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy. Nature 2014 ; 506 : 445–450. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. The death of the cancer cell. Cancer Res 2011 ; 71 : 4334–4337. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maffini MV, Soto AM, Calabro JM, et al. The stroma as a crucial target in rat mammary gland carcinogenesis. J Cell Sci 2004 ; 117 : 1495–1502. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maffini MV, Calabro JM, Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. Stromal regulation of neoplastic development: age-dependent normalization of neoplastic mammary cells by mammary stroma. Am J Pathol 2005 ; 167 : 1405–1410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Booth BW, Boulanger CA, Anderson LH, Smith GH. The normal mammary microenvironment suppresses the tumorigenic phenotype of mouse mammary tumor virus-neu-transformed mammary tumor cells. Oncogene 2011 ; 30 : 679–689. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanahan D. Rethinking the war on cancer. Lancet 2014 ; 383 : 585–563. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Why systems biology and cancer?. Semin Cancer Biol 2011 ; 21 : 147–149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Drack M, Wolkenhauer O. System approaches of Weiss and Bertalanffy and their relevance for systems biology today. Semin Cancer Biol 2011 ; 21 : 150–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Saetzler K, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Systems biology beyond networks: generating order from disorder through self-organization. Semin Cancer Biol 2011 ; 21 : 165–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sasai Y. Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architecture. Nature 2013 ; 493 : 318–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ingber DE, Levin M. What lies at the interface of regenerative medicine and developmental biology?. Development 2009 ; 134 : 2541–2547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Longo G, Miquel PA, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Is information a proper observable for biological organization?. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2012 ; 109 : 108–114. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bizzarri M, Giuliani A, Cucina A, et al. Fractal analysis in a systems biology approach to cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 2011 ; 21 : 175–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Solary E. Une approche réductionniste du cancer. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 683–687. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Capp JP. Le rôle des phénomènes aléatoires dans le cancer. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 693–698. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.