Free Access
Editorial
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 30, Number 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2014
Page(s) 603 - 604
Section Éditorial
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20143006001
Published online 11 July 2014
  1. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K., Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011 ; 10 : 712. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbott A. Doubts over heart stem-cell therapy. Nature 2014 ; 509 : 15–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daniel J. Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J Interact Media Educ 2012 ; 3. [Google Scholar]
  4. Waldrop MM. Online learning: Campus 2.0. Nature 2013 ; 495 : 160–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Siemens G. What is the theory that underpins our moocs? (online) http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-the-theory-that-underpins-our-moocs/ [Google Scholar]
  6. El-Bez C. Les MOOCs. Entre opportunités et défis. Premiers retour d’expérience. Lausanne : University of Lausanne, 2013 : 1–65. [Google Scholar]
  7. Class-Central. Class Central Free Online Education https://http://www.class-central.com/ [Google Scholar]
  8. HSeT. Health Science e-Training Portal (HSeT) http://www.hset.org/cms/. [Google Scholar]
  9. Young JR. Inside the Coursera contract: how an upstart company might profit from free courses http://chronicle.com/article/How-an-Upstart-Company-Might/133065/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.