Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 25, Number 12, Décembre 2009
Anticorps monoclonaux en thérapeutique
Page(s) 1011 - 1019
Section I - De la conception à la production
Published online 15 December 2009
  1. Amzel LM, Poljak RJ. Three-dimensional structure of immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Biochem 1979; 48 : 961–97. [Google Scholar]
  2. Saphire EO, Stanfield RL, Crispin MD, et al. Contrasting IgG structures reveal extreme asymetry and flexibility. J Mol Biol 2002; 319 : 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mariuzza RA, Phillips SE, Poljack RJ. The structural basis of antigen-antibody recognition. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1987; 16 : 139–59. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mian IS, Bradwell AR, Olson AJ. Structure, function and properties of antibody binding sites. J Mol Biol 1991; 217 : 133–51. [Google Scholar]
  5. Oldstone MB. Molecular mimicry and immune-mediated diseases. FASEB J 1998; 12 : 1255–65. [Google Scholar]
  6. James LC, Roversi P, Tawfik DS. Antibody multispecificity mediated by conformational diversity. Science 2003; 299 : 1362–7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Roopenian DC, Akilesh S. FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7 : 715–25. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter P. Potent antibody therapeutics by design. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6 : 343–57. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reichert JM. Monoclonal antibodies as innovative therapeutics. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2008; 9 : 423–30. [Google Scholar]
  10. Teillaud JL. Engineering of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-based fusion proteins: successes and challenges. Exp Opin Biol Ther 2005; 5 : S1–13. [Google Scholar]
  11. Winter G, Milstein C. Man-made antibodies. Nature 1991; 349 : 293–9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bourel D, Teillaud JL. Anticorps monoclonaux : tours et détours technologiques pour de nouveaux espoirs thérapeutiques. CR Biol 2006; 329 : 217–27. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hawkins RE, Russell SJ, Winter G. Selection of phage antibodies by binding affinity. Mimicking affinity maturation. J Mol Biol 1992;226 : 889–96. [Google Scholar]
  14. Coulon S, Pellequer JL, Blachère T, et al. Functional characterization of an anti-estradiol antibody by site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling: modulation of binding properties and prominent role of the V(L) domain in estradiol recognition. J Mol Recognit 2002; 15 : 6–18. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schier R, McCall A, Adams GP, et al. Isolation of picomolar affinity anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv by molecular evolution of the complementarity determining regions in the center of the antibody binding site. J Mol Biol 1996; 263 : 551–67. [Google Scholar]
  16. McLaughlin P, Grillo-López AJ, Link BK, et al. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16 : 2825–33. [Google Scholar]
  17. Teeling JL, French RR, Cragg MS, et al. Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood 2004; 104 : 1793–800. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jeyarajah DR, Thistlethwaite JR. General aspects of cytokine-release syndrome: timing and incidence of symptoms. Transplant Proc 1993; 25 : 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  19. Idusogie EE, Wong PY, Presta LG, et al. Engineered antibodies with increased activity to recruit complement. J Immunol 2001; 166 : 2571–5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Idusogie EE, Presta LG, Gazzano-Santoro H, et al. Mapping of the C1q binding site on Rituxan, a chimeric antibody with a human IgG1 Fc.J Immunol 2000; 164 : 4178–84. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shields RL, Namenuk AK, Hong K,et al. High resolution mapping of the binding site on human IgG1 for Fc gamma RI, Fc gamma RIII, and FcRn and design of IgG1 variants with improved binding to the Fc gamma R J Biol Chem 2001; 276 : 6591–604. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lazar GA, Dang W, Karki S, et al. Engineered antibody Fc variants with enhanced effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103 : 4005–10. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sibéril S, Dutertre CA, Boix C, et al. Molecular aspects of human FcgammaR interactions with IgG: functional and therapeutic consequences. Immunol Lett 2006; 106 : 111–8. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shields RL, Lai J, Keck R,et al. Lack of fucose on human IgG1 N-linked oligosaccharide improves binding to human Fc gamma RIII and antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. J Biol Chem 2002; 277 : 26733–40. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shinkawa T, Nakamura K, Yamane N, et al. The absence of fucose but not the presence of galactose or bisecting N-acetylglucosamine of human IgG1 complex-type oligosaccharides shows the critical role of enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem 2003; 278 : 3466–73. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sibéril S, de Romeuf C, Bihoreau N, et al. Selection of a human anti-RhD monoclonal antibody for therapeutic use: impact of IgG glycosylation on activating and inhibitory Fc gamma R functions. Clin Immunol 2006; 118 : 170–9. [Google Scholar]
  27. Clynes RA, Towers TL, Presta LG., et al. Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo cytoxicity against tumor targets. Nat Med 2000; 6 : 443–6. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cragg MS, Glennie MJ. Antibody specificity controls in vivo effector mechanisms of anti-CD20 reagents. Blood 2004; 103 : 2738–43. [Google Scholar]
  29. Davies DR, Cohen GH. Interactions of protein antigens with antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93 : 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor R, Lindorfer MA. Immunotherapeutic mechanisms of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Curr Opinion Immunol 2008; 20 : 444–9. [Google Scholar]
  31. Umana P, Moessner E, Bruenker P, et al. Novel 3rd generation humanized type II CD20 antibody with glycoengineered Fc and modified elbow hinge for enhanced ADCC and superior apoptosis induction. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2006; 108 : 229. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chan HT, Hughes D, French RR, et al. CD20-induced lymphoma cell death is independent of both caspases and its redistribution into Triton-X100 insoluble membrane rafts. Cancer Res 2003; 63 : 5480–9. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cragg MS, Morgan SM, Chan HT, et al. Complement-mediated lysis by anti-CD20 mAb correlates with segregation into lipid rafts. Blood 2003; 101 : 1045–52. [Google Scholar]
  34. Weiner L, Dhodapkar MV, Ferrone S. Monoclonal antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. Lancet 2009; 373 : 1033–40. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gottlieb A, Menter A, Mendelsohn A, et al. Ustekinumab, a human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, for psoriatic arthritis: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Lancet 2009; 373 : 633–40. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hommes DW, Mikhajlova TL, Stoinov Z, et al. Fontolizumab, a humanized anti-interferon γ antibody, demonstrates safety and clinical activity in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease. Gut 2006; 55 : 1131–7. [Google Scholar]
  37. Skov L, beurskens FJ, Zachariae COC, et al. IL-8 as antibody therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases: reduction of clinical activity in palmoplantar pustulosis. J Immunol 2008; 181 : 669–79. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rossol M, Meusch U, Pierer M,et al. Interaction between transmembrane TNF and TNFR1/2 mediates the activation of monocytes by contact with T cells. J Immunol 2007; 179 : 4239–48. [Google Scholar]
  39. Emilie D. Effect on TNF antagonists on the T-lymphocyte response. Joint Bone Spine 2007;74 : 558–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bruns H, Meinken C, Schauenberg P,et al. Anti-TNF immunotherapy reduces CD8+ T cell-mediated antimicrobial activity against mycobacterium tuberculosis in humans. J Clin Invest 2009; 119 : 1167–77. [Google Scholar]
  41. De Romeuf C, Dutertre CA, Le Garff-Tavernier M, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells are efficiently killed by an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody selected for improved engagement of FcγRIIIA/CD16. Br J Haematol 2008; 140 : 635–43. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin H, Boesel KM, Griffith DT, et al. Omalizumab rapidly decreases nasal allergic response and FcepsilonRI on basophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113 : 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ames SA, Gleeson CD, Kirkpatrick P. Omalizumab. Nat Rev Drug Disc 2004; 3 : 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  44. Arribas J, Borroto A. Protein ectodomain shedding. Chem Rev 2002; 102 : 4627–38. [Google Scholar]
  45. Giles FJ, Vose JM, Do KA, et al. Circulating CD20 and CD52 in patients with non-Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Haematol 2003; 123 : 850–7. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bidermann B, Gil D, Bowen DT, et al. Analysis of the CD33-related siglec family reveals that siglec-9 is an endocytic receptor expressed on subsets of acute myeloid leukemia cells and absent from normal hematopoietic progenitors. Leuk Res 2007; 31 : 211–20. [Google Scholar]
  47. Beum PV, Kennedy AD, Williams ME, et al. The shaving reaction: rituximab/CD20 complexes are removed from mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by THP-1 monocytes. J Immunol 2006; 176 : 2600–9. [Google Scholar]
  48. Klastersky J. Adverse effects of the humanized antibodies used as cancer therapeutics. Curr Opin Oncol 2006; 18 : 316–20. [Google Scholar]
  49. Agus DB, Gordon MS, Taylor C. Phase I clinical study of pertuzumab, a novel HER dimerization inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 : 2534–43. [Google Scholar]
  50. Schraven B, Kalinke U. CD28 superagonists: what makes the difference in humans ? Immunity 2008; 28 : 591–5. [Google Scholar]
  51. Loisel S, Ohresser M, Pallardy M, et al. Relevance, advantages and limitations of animal models used in the development of monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007;62 : 34–42. [Google Scholar]
  52. Behring E, Kitasato S. Über das Zustandekommen der Diphterie-Immunität und der Tetanus-Immunität bei Thieren. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1890; 16 : 1113–4. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ducancel F. Quand la diversité du répertoire des immunoglobulines augmente ! Med Sci (Paris) 2003; 19 : 790–2. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.