EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 25 / No 8-9 (Août-Septembre 2009) Med Sci (Paris), 25 8-9 (2009) 705-712 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 25, Number 8-9, Août-Septembre 2009
Page(s) 705 - 712
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2009258-9705
Published online 15 August 2009
  1. Ancel Meyers L, Bull JJ. Fighting change with change: adaptove variation in an uncertain world. TREE 2002; 17 : 551–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Braendle C, Milloz J, Félix, MA. Mechanisms and evolution of environmental responses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Top Dev Biol 2008; 80 : 171–207. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lewontin RC. The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Am J Hum Genet 1974;26 : 400–11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Maynard Smith J. Evolutionary genetics. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1989 : 326 p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates, 1998 : 388 p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson G. The environmental contribution to gene expression profiles. Nat Rev Gen 2008; 9 : 575–81. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lewontin R. The triple helix-gene, organism, and environment. Boston : Harvard University Press, 2000 : 130 p. [Google Scholar]
  8. West-Eberhard MJ. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2003 : 720 p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lynch M, Walsh, B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates, 1998 : 804 p. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sternberg PW. Vulval development. The C. elegans research community (http://www.wormbook.org/). Wormbook 2005; 25 juin : 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hajnal A, Whitfield CW, Kim SK. Inhibition of Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction by gap-1 and by let-23 receptor tyrosine kinase. Genes Dev 1997; 11 : 2715–28. [Google Scholar]
  12. Milloz J, Duveau F, Nuez I, Félix MA. Intraspecific evolution of the intercellular signaling network underlying a robust developmental system. Genes Dev 2008; 22 : 3064–75. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dworkin I, Palsson A, Birdsall K, Gibson G. Evidence that Egfr contributes to cryptic genetic variation for photoreceptor determination in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 2003; 13 : 1888–93. [Google Scholar]
  14. Threadgill DW, Dlugosz AA, Hansen LA, et al. Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Science 1995; 269 : 230–4. [Google Scholar]
  15. Braendle C, Félix MA. Plasticity and errors of a robust developmental system in different environments. Dev Cell 2008; 15 : 714–24. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tautz D. A genetic uncertainty problem. Trends Genet 2000; 16 : 475–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Brakefield PM, Gates J, Keys D, et al. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 1996; 384 : 236–42. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sulston J, Horvitz HR. Postembryonic cell lineages of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 1977; 56 : 110–56. [Google Scholar]
  19. Félix MA. Un ver, 959 cellules et 13 000 gènes. Med Sci (Paris) 1997;13 : 156–65. [Google Scholar]
  20. Félix MA, Labouesse M, Ségalat L. Caenorhabditis elegans. Un organisme modèle en biologie. Paris : Hermann, 2002 : 194 p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vassilieva LL, Hook AM, Lynch M. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 2000; 54 : 1234–46. [Google Scholar]
  22. Denver DR, Morris K, Lynch M, Thomas WK. High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome. Nature 2004; 430 : 679–82. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dichtel-Danjoy ML, Félix MA. Phenotypic neighborhood and micro-evolvability. Trends Genet 2004; 20 : 268–76. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibson G, Dworkin I. Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5 : 681–90. [Google Scholar]
  25. Félix MA, Wagner A. Robustness and evolution: concepts, insights and challenges from a developmental model system. Heredity 2008;100 : 132–40. [Google Scholar]
  26. Von Dassow G, Meir E, Munro EM, Odell GM. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 2000; 406 : 188–92. [Google Scholar]
  27. Giurumescu CA, Sternberg PW, Asthagiri AR. Intercellular coupling amplifies fate segregation during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103 : 1331–6. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibson G. Decanalization and the origin of complex disease. Nat Rev Gen 2009; 10 : 134–40. [Google Scholar]
  29. Delattre M, Félix MA. Polymorphism and evolution of vulval precursor cell lineages within two nematode genera, Caenorhabditis and Oscheius. Curr Biol 2001; 11 : 631–43. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.