Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 25, Numéro 8-9, Août-Septembre 2009
Page(s) 705 - 712
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2009258-9705
Publié en ligne 15 août 2009
  1. Ancel Meyers L, Bull JJ. Fighting change with change: adaptove variation in an uncertain world. TREE 2002; 17 : 551–7.
  2. Braendle C, Milloz J, Félix, MA. Mechanisms and evolution of environmental responses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Top Dev Biol 2008; 80 : 171–207.
  3. Lewontin RC. The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Am J Hum Genet 1974;26 : 400–11.
  4. Maynard Smith J. Evolutionary genetics. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1989 : 326 p.
  5. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates, 1998 : 388 p.
  6. Gibson G. The environmental contribution to gene expression profiles. Nat Rev Gen 2008; 9 : 575–81.
  7. Lewontin R. The triple helix-gene, organism, and environment. Boston : Harvard University Press, 2000 : 130 p.
  8. West-Eberhard MJ. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2003 : 720 p.
  9. Lynch M, Walsh, B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates, 1998 : 804 p.
  10. Sternberg PW. Vulval development. The C. elegans research community (http://www.wormbook.org/). Wormbook 2005; 25 juin : 1–28.
  11. Hajnal A, Whitfield CW, Kim SK. Inhibition of Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction by gap-1 and by let-23 receptor tyrosine kinase. Genes Dev 1997; 11 : 2715–28.
  12. Milloz J, Duveau F, Nuez I, Félix MA. Intraspecific evolution of the intercellular signaling network underlying a robust developmental system. Genes Dev 2008; 22 : 3064–75.
  13. Dworkin I, Palsson A, Birdsall K, Gibson G. Evidence that Egfr contributes to cryptic genetic variation for photoreceptor determination in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 2003; 13 : 1888–93.
  14. Threadgill DW, Dlugosz AA, Hansen LA, et al. Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Science 1995; 269 : 230–4.
  15. Braendle C, Félix MA. Plasticity and errors of a robust developmental system in different environments. Dev Cell 2008; 15 : 714–24.
  16. Tautz D. A genetic uncertainty problem. Trends Genet 2000; 16 : 475–7.
  17. Brakefield PM, Gates J, Keys D, et al. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 1996; 384 : 236–42.
  18. Sulston J, Horvitz HR. Postembryonic cell lineages of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 1977; 56 : 110–56.
  19. Félix MA. Un ver, 959 cellules et 13 000 gènes. Med Sci (Paris) 1997;13 : 156–65.
  20. Félix MA, Labouesse M, Ségalat L. Caenorhabditis elegans. Un organisme modèle en biologie. Paris : Hermann, 2002 : 194 p.
  21. Vassilieva LL, Hook AM, Lynch M. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 2000; 54 : 1234–46.
  22. Denver DR, Morris K, Lynch M, Thomas WK. High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome. Nature 2004; 430 : 679–82.
  23. Dichtel-Danjoy ML, Félix MA. Phenotypic neighborhood and micro-evolvability. Trends Genet 2004; 20 : 268–76.
  24. Gibson G, Dworkin I. Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5 : 681–90.
  25. Félix MA, Wagner A. Robustness and evolution: concepts, insights and challenges from a developmental model system. Heredity 2008;100 : 132–40.
  26. Von Dassow G, Meir E, Munro EM, Odell GM. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 2000; 406 : 188–92.
  27. Giurumescu CA, Sternberg PW, Asthagiri AR. Intercellular coupling amplifies fate segregation during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103 : 1331–6.
  28. Gibson G. Decanalization and the origin of complex disease. Nat Rev Gen 2009; 10 : 134–40.
  29. Delattre M, Félix MA. Polymorphism and evolution of vulval precursor cell lineages within two nematode genera, Caenorhabditis and Oscheius. Curr Biol 2001; 11 : 631–43.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.