Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 23, Number 11, Novembre 2007
Page(s) 944 - 949
Section M/S revues
Published online 15 November 2007
  1. Dumont A, Merviel P, Berkane N, et al. Facteurs de risque de la pré-éclampsie. Presse Med 1999; 28 : 2189–96. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lindheimer MD, Umans JG. Explaining and predicting preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 : 1056–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Poston L, Briley AL, Seed PT, et al. Vitamin C and vitamin E in pregnant women at risk for pre-eclampsia (VIP trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 367 : 1145–54. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stepan H, Faber R, Dornhofer N, et al. New Insights into the Biology of Preeclampsia. Biol Reprod 2006; 74: 772–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ianosi-Irimie M, Vu H, Withbred JM, et al. A rat model of preeclampsia. Clin Exp Hypertens 2005; 8 : 605–17. [Google Scholar]
  6. Salas SP, Marshall G, Gutierrez BL, Rosso P. Time course of maternal plasma volume and hormonal changes in women with preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. Hypertension 2006; 47 : 203–8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman AB, Abraham WT, Zamudio S, et al. Temporal relationships between hormonal and hemodynamic. changes in early human pregnancy. Kidney Int 1998; 54 : 2056–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baylis C, Beinder E, Suto T, August P. Recent insights into the roles of nitric oxide and renin-angiotensin in the pathophysiology of preeclamptic pregnancy. Semin Nephrol 1998; 18 : 208–30. [Google Scholar]
  9. St-Louis J, Massicotte G, Parent A. Effet anti-hypertenseur de la grossesse: influence de la réactivité vasculaire. Med Sci (Paris) 1988; 6 : 358–65. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abdul-Karim R, Assali NS. Pressor response to angiotensin in pregnant and non pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 82 : 246–51. [Google Scholar]
  11. Roy B, Sicotte B, Brochu M, St-Louis J. Effects of nifedipine and Bay K 8644 on myotropic responses in aortic rings of pregnant rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1995; 280 : 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Teeuw AH, De Jong W. Time course of decrease in blood pressure and in blood pressure response to vasopressor agents during pregnancy in the rat. Pflugers Arch 1973; 341 : 197–208. [Google Scholar]
  13. Roy B, Sicotte B, Brochu M, St-Louis J. Modulation of calcium mobilization in aortic rings of pregnant rats: contribution of extracellular calcium and of voltage-operated calcium channels. Biol Reprod 1999; 60 : 979–88. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brochu M, Gauvin JP, St-Louis J. Increase of aldosterone in adrenal cortex suspensions derived from pregnant rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1996; 212 : 148–53. [Google Scholar]
  15. Simaan M, Cadorette C, Poterek M, et al. Calcium channels contribute to the decrease in blood pressure of pregnant rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002; 282 : H665–71. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cadorette C, Sicotte B, Brochu M, St-Louis J. Effects of potassium channel modulators on myotropic responses of aortic rings of pregnant rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 278 : H567–76. [Google Scholar]
  17. Keyes L, Rodman DM, Curran-Everett D, et al. Effect of K+ATP channel inhibition on total and regional vascular resistance in guinea pig pregnancy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1998; 275 : H680–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer MC, Brayden JE, McLaughlin MK. Characteristics of vascular smooth muscle in the maternal resistance circulation during pregnancy in the rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169 : 1510–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Roy-Clavel E, Picard S, St-Louis J, Brochu M. Induction of uterine growth restriction with low-sodium diet fed to pregnant rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180 : 608–13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Baylis C, Munger K. Persistance of maternal plasma volume expansion in midterm pregnant rats maintained on a zero sodium intake: evidence that early gestational volume expansion does not require sodium retension. Clin Exp Hypertens Pregnancy 1990; B9 : 237–47. [Google Scholar]
  21. Beauséjour A, Auger K, St-Louis J, Brochu M. High-sodium intake prevents pregnancy-induced decrease of blood pressure in the rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 285 : H375–83. [Google Scholar]
  22. Auger K, Beauséjour A, Brochu M, St-Louis J. Increased Na+ intake during gestation in rats is associated with enhanced vascular reactivity and alterations of K+ and Ca++ function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004; 287 : H1848–56. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Molecular and cellular basis of cardiovascular gender differences. Science 2005; 308 : 1583–7. [Google Scholar]
  24. Durr JA, Stamoutsos B, Lindheimer MD. Osmoregulation during pregnancy in the rat: evidence for resetting of threshold for vasopressin secretion during gestation. J Clin Invest 1981; 68 : 337–46. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen DB, Jia S, King AG, et al. Global protein expression profiling underlines reciprocal regulation of caveolin 1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression in ovariectomized sheep uterine artery by estrogen/progesterone replacement therapy1. Biol Reprod 2006; 74 : 832–8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ahokas RA, Anderson GD, Lipshitz J. Cardiac output and uteroplacental blood flow diet-restricted and diet-repleted pregnant rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146 : 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  27. MacGillivray I, Rose GA, Rowe B. Blood pressure survey in pregnancy. Clin Sci 1969; 37 : 395–407. [Google Scholar]
  28. Moutquin JM, Rainville C, Giroux L, et al. A prospective study of blood pressure in pregnancy: prediction of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151 : 191–6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lindheimer MD, Sibai BM. Antioxidant supplementation in pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2006; 367: 1119–20. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.