Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 22, Number 8-9, Août–Septembre 2006
Page(s) 721 - 726
Section M/S revues
Published online 15 August 2006
  1. Davis DM, Dustin ML. What is the importance of the immunological synapse ? Trends Immunol 2004; 25 : 323–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H,et al. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 1998; 395 : 82–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C,et al. The immunological synapse : a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999; 285 : 221–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mempel TR, Henrickson SE, Von Andrian UH. T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature 2004; 427 : 154–9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller MJ, Safrina O, Parker I, Cahalan MD. Imaging the single cell dynamics of CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J Exp Med 2004; 200 : 847–56. [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller MJ, Wei SH, Parker I, Cahalan MD. Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node. Science 2002; 296 : 1869–73. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bousso P, Robey E. Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes. Nat Immunol 2003; 4 : 579–85. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stoll S, Delon J, Brotz TM, Germain RN. Dynamic imaging of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in lymph nodes. Science 2002; 296 : 1873–6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee KH, Holdorf AD, Dustin ML,et al. T cell receptor signaling precedes immunological synapse formation. Science 2002; 295 : 1539–42. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schamel WW, Arechaga I, Risueno RM,et al. Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J Exp Med 2005; 202 : 493–503. [Google Scholar]
  11. Randriamampita C, Boulla G, Revy P,et al. T cell adhesion lowers the threshold for antigen detection. Eur J Immunol 2003; 33 : 1215–23. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaiser A, Donnadieu E, Abastado JP,et al. CC chemokine ligand 19 secreted by mature dendritic cells increases naive T cell scanning behavior and their response to rare cognate antigen. J Immunol 2005; 175 : 2349–56. [Google Scholar]
  13. Molon B, Gri G, Bettella M,et al. T cell costimulation by chemokine receptors. Nat Immunol 2005; 6 : 465–71. [Google Scholar]
  14. Trautmann A. Chemokines as immunotransmitters ? Nat Immunol 2005; 6 : 427–8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brossard C, Feuillet V, Schmitt A,et al. Multifocal structure of the T cell-dendritic cell synapse. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35 : 1741–53. [Google Scholar]
  16. Real E, Kaiser A, Raposo G,et al. Immature dendritic cells (DCs) use chemokines and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, but not DC-specific ICAM-3-grabbing nonintegrin, to stimulate CD4+ T cells in the absence of exogenous antigen. J Immunol 2004; 173 : 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  17. Benvenuti F, Hugues S, Walmsley M,et al. Requirement of Rac1 and Rac2 expression by mature dendritic cells for T cell priming. Science 2004; 305 : 1150–3. [Google Scholar]
  18. Faure S, Salazar-Fontana LI, Semichon M,et al. ERM proteins regulate cytoskeleton relaxation promoting T cell-APC conjugation. Nat Immunol 2004; 5 : 272–9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Depoil D, Zaru R, Guiraud M,et al. Immunological synapses are versatile structures enabling selective T cell polarization. Immunity 2005; 22 : 185–94. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yokosuka T, Sakata-Sogawa K, Kobayashi W,et al. Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol 2005; 6 : 1253–62. [Google Scholar]
  21. Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med 2005; 202 : 1031–6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Irvine DJ, Purbhoo MA, Krogsgaard M, Davis MM. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 2002; 419 : 845–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee KH, Dinner AR, Tu C,et al. The immunological synapse balances T cell receptor signaling and degradation. Science 2003; 302 : 1218–22. [Google Scholar]
  24. Harriague J, Bismuth G. Imaging antigen-induced PI3K activation in T cells. Nat Immunol 2002; 3 : 1090–6. [Google Scholar]
  25. Costello PS, Gallagher M, Cantrell DA. Sustained and dynamic inositol lipid metabolism inside and outside the immunological synapse. Nat Immunol 2002; 3 : 1082–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fabre S, Lang V, Harriague J,et al. Stable activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in the T cell immunological synapse stimulates Akt signaling to FoxO1 nuclear exclusion and cell growth control. J Immunol 2005; 174 : 4161–71. [Google Scholar]
  27. Das V, Nal B, Dujeancourt A,et al. Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse ; involvement of SNARE complexes. Immunity 2004; 20 : 577–88. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huppa JB, Gleimer M, Sumen C, Davis MM. Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential. Nat Immunol 2003; 4 : 749–55. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.