Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 22, Numéro 8-9, Août–Septembre 2006
Page(s) 721 - 726
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20062289721
Publié en ligne 15 août 2006
  1. Davis DM, Dustin ML. What is the importance of the immunological synapse ? Trends Immunol 2004; 25 : 323–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H,et al. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 1998; 395 : 82–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C,et al. The immunological synapse : a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999; 285 : 221–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mempel TR, Henrickson SE, Von Andrian UH. T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature 2004; 427 : 154–9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller MJ, Safrina O, Parker I, Cahalan MD. Imaging the single cell dynamics of CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J Exp Med 2004; 200 : 847–56. [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller MJ, Wei SH, Parker I, Cahalan MD. Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node. Science 2002; 296 : 1869–73. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bousso P, Robey E. Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes. Nat Immunol 2003; 4 : 579–85. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stoll S, Delon J, Brotz TM, Germain RN. Dynamic imaging of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in lymph nodes. Science 2002; 296 : 1873–6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee KH, Holdorf AD, Dustin ML,et al. T cell receptor signaling precedes immunological synapse formation. Science 2002; 295 : 1539–42. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schamel WW, Arechaga I, Risueno RM,et al. Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J Exp Med 2005; 202 : 493–503. [Google Scholar]
  11. Randriamampita C, Boulla G, Revy P,et al. T cell adhesion lowers the threshold for antigen detection. Eur J Immunol 2003; 33 : 1215–23. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaiser A, Donnadieu E, Abastado JP,et al. CC chemokine ligand 19 secreted by mature dendritic cells increases naive T cell scanning behavior and their response to rare cognate antigen. J Immunol 2005; 175 : 2349–56. [Google Scholar]
  13. Molon B, Gri G, Bettella M,et al. T cell costimulation by chemokine receptors. Nat Immunol 2005; 6 : 465–71. [Google Scholar]
  14. Trautmann A. Chemokines as immunotransmitters ? Nat Immunol 2005; 6 : 427–8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brossard C, Feuillet V, Schmitt A,et al. Multifocal structure of the T cell-dendritic cell synapse. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35 : 1741–53. [Google Scholar]
  16. Real E, Kaiser A, Raposo G,et al. Immature dendritic cells (DCs) use chemokines and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, but not DC-specific ICAM-3-grabbing nonintegrin, to stimulate CD4+ T cells in the absence of exogenous antigen. J Immunol 2004; 173 : 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  17. Benvenuti F, Hugues S, Walmsley M,et al. Requirement of Rac1 and Rac2 expression by mature dendritic cells for T cell priming. Science 2004; 305 : 1150–3. [Google Scholar]
  18. Faure S, Salazar-Fontana LI, Semichon M,et al. ERM proteins regulate cytoskeleton relaxation promoting T cell-APC conjugation. Nat Immunol 2004; 5 : 272–9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Depoil D, Zaru R, Guiraud M,et al. Immunological synapses are versatile structures enabling selective T cell polarization. Immunity 2005; 22 : 185–94. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yokosuka T, Sakata-Sogawa K, Kobayashi W,et al. Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol 2005; 6 : 1253–62. [Google Scholar]
  21. Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med 2005; 202 : 1031–6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Irvine DJ, Purbhoo MA, Krogsgaard M, Davis MM. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 2002; 419 : 845–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee KH, Dinner AR, Tu C,et al. The immunological synapse balances T cell receptor signaling and degradation. Science 2003; 302 : 1218–22. [Google Scholar]
  24. Harriague J, Bismuth G. Imaging antigen-induced PI3K activation in T cells. Nat Immunol 2002; 3 : 1090–6. [Google Scholar]
  25. Costello PS, Gallagher M, Cantrell DA. Sustained and dynamic inositol lipid metabolism inside and outside the immunological synapse. Nat Immunol 2002; 3 : 1082–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fabre S, Lang V, Harriague J,et al. Stable activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in the T cell immunological synapse stimulates Akt signaling to FoxO1 nuclear exclusion and cell growth control. J Immunol 2005; 174 : 4161–71. [Google Scholar]
  27. Das V, Nal B, Dujeancourt A,et al. Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse ; involvement of SNARE complexes. Immunity 2004; 20 : 577–88. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huppa JB, Gleimer M, Sumen C, Davis MM. Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential. Nat Immunol 2003; 4 : 749–55. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.