EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 21 / No 6-7 (Juin–Juillet 2005) Med Sci (Paris), 21 6-7 (2005) 634-640 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 21, Number 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2005
Page(s) 634 - 640
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2005216-7634
Published online 15 June 2005
  1. Cuille J, Chelle PL. Pathologie animale. La maladie dite tremblante du mouton est-elle inoculable ? CR Acad Sci (Paris) 1936; 203 : 1552–4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hadlow WJ. Scrapie and Kuru. Lancet 1959; 2 : 289–90. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandler RL. Encephalopathy in mice produced by inoculation with scrapie brain material. Lancet 1961; 1 : 1378–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gajdusek DC. Transmissible and non-transmissible amyloidoses: autocatalytic post-translational conversion of host precursor proteins to ß-pleated conformations. J Neuroimmunol 1988; 20 : 95–110. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alper T, Haig DA , Clarke MC. The exceptionally small size of the scrapie agent. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1966; 22 : 278–84. [Google Scholar]
  6. Griffith JS. Self-replication and scrapie. Nature 1967; 215 : 1043–4. [Google Scholar]
  7. Prusiner SB, Groth DF, Cochran SP, et al. Molecular properties, partial purification, and assay by incubation period measurements of the hamster scrapie agent. Biochemistry 1980; 19 : 4883–91. [Google Scholar]
  8. Prusiner SB, McKinley MP, Groth DF, et al. Scrapie agent contains a hydrophobic protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78 : 6675–9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Prusiner SB, Bolton DC, Groth DF, et al. Further purification and characterization of scrapie prions. Biochemistry 1982; 26 : 6942–50. [Google Scholar]
  10. Prusiner SB, McKinley MP, Bowman KA, et al. Scrapie prions aggregate to form amyloid-like birefringent rods. Cell 1983; 35 : 349–58. [Google Scholar]
  11. Prusiner SB, Groth DF, Bolton DC, et al. Purification and structural studies of a major scrapie prion protein. Cell 1984; 38 : 127–34. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sailer A, Bueler H, Fischer M, et al. No propagation of prions in mice devoid of PrP. Cell 1994; 77 : 967–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schätzl HM, Da Costa M, Taylor L, et al. Prion protein gene variation among primates. J Mol Biol 1995; 254 : 362–74. [Google Scholar]
  14. Endo T, Groth D, Prusiner SB, Kobata A. Diversity of oligosaccharide structures linked to asparagines of the scrapie prion protein. Biochemistry 1989; 28 : 8380–8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stahl N, Borchelt DR, Hsiao K, Prusiner SB. Scrapie prion protein contains a phosphatidylinositol glycolipid. Cell 1987; 51 : 229–40. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rudd PM, Endo T, Colominas C, et al. Glycosylation differences between the normal and pathogenic prion protein isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96 : 13044–9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Riek R, Hornemann S, Wider G, et al. NMR structure of the mouse prion protein domain PrP(121-321). Nature 1996; 382 : 180–2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Billeter M, Riek R, Wider G, et al. Prion protein NMR structure and species barrier for prion diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94 : 7281–5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang Z, Prusiner SB, Cohen FE. Scrapie prions: a three-dimensional model of an infectious fragment. Folding Des 1996; 1 : 13–9. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cantor CR, Schimmel PR. Biophysical chemistry, 12th ed. New York : WH Freeman and Co, 2001 : 409–31. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jackson GS, Hosszu LL, Power A, et al. Reversible conversion of monomeric human prion protein between native and fibrilogenic conformations. Science 1999; 283 : 1935–7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hill AF, Antoniou M, Collinge. Protease-resistant prion protein produced in vitro lacks detectable infectivity. J Gen Virol 1999; 80 : 11–4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Legname G, Baskakov IV, Nguyen HO, et al. Synthetic mammalian prions. Science 2004; 305 : 673–6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Couzin J. An end to the prion debate ? Don’t count on it. Science 2004; 305 : 589. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cox BS. PSI, a cytoplasmic suppressor of super-suppressor in yeast. Heredity 1965; 20 : 505–21. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lacroute F. Non-Mendelian mutation allowing ureidosuccinic acid uptake in yeast. J Bacteriol 1971; 106 : 519–22. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wickner RB. Evidence for a prion analog in S. cerevisiae: The [URE3] non-Mendelian genetic element as an altered URE2 protein. Science 1994; 264 : 566–9. [Google Scholar]
  28. Serio TR, Cashikar AG, Kowal AS, et al. Nucleated conformational conversion and the replication of conformational information by a prion determinant. Science 2000; 289 : 1317–21. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bousset L, Thomson NH, Radford SE, Melki R. The yeast prion Ure2p retains its native alpha-helical conformation upon assembly into protein fibrils in vitro. EMBO J 2002; 21 : 2903–11. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sunde M, Serpell LC, Bartlam M, et al. Common core structure of amyloid fibrils by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. J Mol Biol 1997; 273 : 729–39. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zurdo J, Guijarro JI, Dobson CM. Preparation and characterization of purified amyloid fibrils. J Am Chem Soc 2001; 123 : 8141–2. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bousset L, Briki F, Doucet J, Melki R. The native-like conformation of Ure2p in fibrils assembled under physiologically relevant conditions switches to an amyloid-like conformation upon heat-treatment of the fibrils. J Struct Biol 2003; 141 : 132–42. [Google Scholar]
  33. Abram D, Koffler H. In vitro formation of flagella-like filaments and other structure from flagellin. J Mol Biol 1964; 9 : 168–85. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lomas DA, Carrell RW. Serpinopathies and the conformational dementias. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3 : 759–68. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tuite MF, Cox BS. Propagation of yeast prions. Nat Rev 2003; 4 : 878–89. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bousset L, Belrhali H, Janin J, et al. Structure of the globular region of the prion protein Ure2 from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Structure 2001; 9 :39–46. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.