Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 21, Number 4, Avril 2005
Page(s) 390 - 395
Section M/S revues
Published online 15 April 2005
  1. McGrath J, Solter D. Completion of embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 1984; 37 : 179–83. [Google Scholar]
  2. Surani MA, Barton S, Norris M. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 1984; 308 : 548–50. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cattanach BM, Kirk M. Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice. Nature 1985; 315 : 496–8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cattanach BM, Beechey CV, Peters J. Interactions between imprinting effects in the mouse. Genetics 2004; 168 : 397–413. [Google Scholar]
  5. DeChiara TM, Efstratiadis A, Robertson EJ. A growth deficiency phenotype in heterozygous mice carrying an insulin-like growth factor II gene disrupted by gene targeting. Nature 1990; 345 : 78–80. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barlow DP, Stoger R, Hermann BG, et al. The mouse insulin-like growth factor type 2 receptor is imprinted and closely linked to the Tme locus. Nature 1991; 349 : 84–7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 1992; 69 : 915–26. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, Li E. Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 2002; 129 : 1983–93. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourc’his D, Xu GL, Lin CS, et al. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 2001; 294 : 2536–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3 : 662–73. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mager J, Montgomery ND, de Villena FP, Magnuson T. Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed. Nat Genet 2003; 33 : 502–7. [Google Scholar]
  12. Umlauf D, Goto Y, Cao R, et al. Imprinting along the Kcnq1 domain on mouse chromosome 7 involves repressive histone methylation and recruitment of Polycomb group complexes. Nat Genet 2004; 36 : 1296–300. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis A, Mitsuya K, Umlauf D, et al. Imprinting on distal chromosome 7 in the placenta involves repressive histone methylation independent of DNA methylation. Nat Genet 2004; 36 : 1291–5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 2001; 293 : 1089–93. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucifero D, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS, Trasler JM. Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13 : 839–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Obata Y, Kaneko-Ishino T, Koide T, et al. Disruption of primary imprinting during oocyte growth leads to the modified expression of imprinted genes during embryogenesis. Development 1998; 125 : 1553–60. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kono T, Obata Y, Wu Q, et al. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 2004; 428 : 860–4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lopes S, Lewis A, Hajkova P, et al. Epigenetic modifications in an imprinting cluster are controlled by a hierarchy of DMRs suggesting long-range chromatin interactions. Hum Mol Genet 2003; 12 : 295–305. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hark AT, Schoenherr CJ, Katz DJ, et al. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature 2000; 405 : 486–9. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee MP, DeBaun MR, Mitsuya K, et al. Loss of imprinting of a paternally expressed transcript, with antisense orientation to KVLQT1, occurs frequently in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and is independent of insulin-like growth factor II imprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96 : 5203–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wutz A, Smrzka OW, Schweifer N, et al. Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island. Nature 1997; 389 : 745–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sleutels F, Zwart R, Barlow DP. The non-coding Air RNA is required for silencing autosomal imprinted genes. Nature 2002; 415 : 810–3. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rougeulle C, Cardoso C, Fontes M, et al. An imprinted antisense RNA overlaps UBE3A and a second maternally expressed transcript. Nat Genet 1998; 19 : 15–6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Landers M, Bancescu DL, Le Meur E, et al. Regulation of the large (approximately 1000 kb) imprinted murine Ube3a antisense transcript by alternative exons upstream of Snurf/Snrpn. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32 : 3480–92. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rougeulle C, Heard E. Antisense RNA in imprinting: spreading silence through Air. Trends Genet 2002; 18 : 434–7. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thakur N, Tiwari VK, Thomassin H, et al. An antisense RNA regulates the bidirectional silencing property of the Kcnq1 imprinting control region. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24 : 7855–62. [Google Scholar]
  27. Verona RI, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS. Genomic imprinting: intricacies of epigenetic regulation in clusters. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2003; 19 : 237–59. [Google Scholar]
  28. Drewell RA, Brenton JD, Ainscough JF, et al. Deletion of a silencer element disrupts H19 imprinting independently of a DNA methylation epigenetic switch. Development 2000; 127 : 3419–28. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gosden R, Trasler J, Lucifero D, Faddy M. Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 2003; 361 : 1975–7. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.