EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 19 / No 1 (Janvier 2003) Med Sci (Paris), 19 1 (2003) 92-99 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Number 1, Janvier 2003
Page(s) 92 - 99
Section M/S Revues : Dossier Technique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/200319192
Published online 15 January 2003
  1. Binig G, Rohrer H, Gerber C, Weibel E. Surface studies by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 1982; 49: 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  2. Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 1986; 56: 930–3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kasas S. La microscopie à force atomique dans la recherche en biologie. Med Sci 1992; 8: 140–8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Engel A, Gaub HE, Müller DJ. Atomic force microscopy: a forceful way with single molecules. Curr Biol 1999; 9: R133–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Radmacher M, Tillmann RW, Fritz M, Gaub HE. From molecules to cells: imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope. Science 1992; 257: 1900–5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Le Grimellec C, Lesniewska E, Cachia C, Schreiber JP, de Fornel F, Goudonnet JP. Imaging the membrane surface of MDCK cells by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 1994; 67: 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dufrêne YF. Atomic force microscopy of microbial cells. Microsc Analysis 2001; 3: 27–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Crèvecoeur M, Lesniewska E, Vié, V, Goudonnet JP, Greppin H, Le Grimellec C. Atomic-force microscopy imaging of plasma membranes purified from spinach leaves. Protoplasma 2000; 212: 46–55. [Google Scholar]
  9. Le Grimellec C, Lesniewska E, Milhiet PE, Giocondi MC. AFM imaging of cells and membranes. In: Jena BP, ed. Atomic force microscopy in cell biology. Methods in cell biology. New York: Academic Press, 2002; 68: 51–65. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schneider SW, Sritharan KC, Geibel JP, Oberleithner H, Jena BP. Surface dynamics in living acinar cells imaged by atomic force microscopy: identification of plasma membrane structures involved in exocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 316–21. [Google Scholar]
  11. Giocondi MC, Vié V, Leniewska E, Goudonnet JP, Le Grimellec C. In situ imaging of detergentresistant membranes by atomic force microscopy. J Struct Biol 2000; 131: 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hinterdorfer P, Baumgartner W, Gruber HJ, Schilcher K, Schindler H. Detection and localization of individual antibodyantigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 3477–81. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wong SW, Joselevich E, Woolley AT, Cheung CL, Lieber CM. Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometer-sized probes in chemistry and biology. Nature 1998; 394: 52–5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tsilimbaris MK, Lesniewska E, Lydataki S, Le Grimellec C, Goudonnet JP, Palikaris IG. The use of atomic force microscopy for the observation of corneal epithelium surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 680–6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Matzke R, Jacobson K, Radmacher M. Direct, highresolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3: 607- 10. [Google Scholar]
  16. Le Grimellec C, Lesniewska E, Giocondi MC, Cachia C, Shreiber JP, Goudonnet JP. Imaging of the cytoplasmic leaflet of the plasma membrane by atomic force microscopy. Scanning Microsc 1995; 9: 401–11. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoh JH, Sosinsky GE, Revel JP, Hansma PK. Structure of the extracellular surface of the gap junction by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 1993; 65: 149–63. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shahin V, Danker T, Enss K, Ossig R, Oberleithner H. Evidence for Ca2+ and ATPsensitive peripheral channels in nuclear pore complexes. FASEB J 2001; 15: 1895–901. [Google Scholar]
  19. Giocondi MC, Vié V, Lesniewska E, Milhiet PE, Zinke-Allmang M, Le Grimellec C. Imaging the phase topology and growth of domains in supported lipid bilayers. Langmuir 2001; 17: 1653–9. [Google Scholar]
  20. Milhiet PE, Giocondi MC, Le Grimellec C. Cholesterol is not crucial for the existence of microdomains in kidney brush-border membrane models. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 875–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vié V, Van Mau N, Chaloin L, Lesniewska E, Le Grimellec C, Heitz, F. Detection of peptide-lipid interactions in mixed monolayers using isotherms, atomic force microscopy and Fourier transform infrared analyses. Biophys J 2000; 78: 846–56. [Google Scholar]
  22. Engel A, Müller DJ. Observing single biomolecules at work with the atomic force microscope. Nat Struct Biol 2000; 7: 715–8. [Google Scholar]
  23. Reviakine I, Bergsma- Schutter W, Brisson A. Growth of protein 2-D crystals on supported planar lipid bilayers imaged in situ by AFM. J Struct Biol 1998; 121: 356–61. [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller DJ, Engel A. Voltage and pH-induced channel closure of porin OmpF visualized by atomic force microscopy. J Mol Biol 1999; 285: 1347–51. [Google Scholar]
  25. Milhiet PE, Vié V, Giocondi MC, Le Grimellec C. AFM characterization of model rafts in supported bilayers. Single Mol 2001; 2: 109–12. [Google Scholar]
  26. Le Cam E, Frechon D, Barray M, Fourcade A, Delain E. Observation of binding and polymerisation of Fur repressor onto operatorcontaining DNA with electron and atomic force microscopes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 11816–20. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hansma HG. Surface biology of DNA by atomic force microscopy. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2001; 52: 71–92. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ladoux B, Quivy JP, Doyle P, du Roure O, Almouzni G, Viovy JL. Fast kinetics of chromatin assembly revealed by singlemolecule videomicroscopy and scanning force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 14251–6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanchez A, Thimonier J, Mariley M, Rocca-Serra J, Barbet J. Accuracy of AFM measurements on the contour length of DNA fragments adsorbed on mica in air and aqueous buffer. Ultramicroscopy 2002; 92: 151–8. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bustamante C, Guthold M, Zhu X, Yang G. Facilitated target location on DNA by individual Escherichia coli RNA polymerases molecules observed with the scanning force microscope operating in liquid. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 16665–8. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ding TT, Harper JD. Analysis of amyloid-β asemblies using tapping mode atomic force microscopy under ambient conditions. In: Abelson JN, Simon MI, eds. Amyloids, prions and other protein aggregates. Methods in enzymology. New York : Academic Press, 1999; 309: 510–25. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mou JX, Czajkowski DM, Sheng SJ, Ho RY, Shao ZF. High resolution surface structure of E. coli GroES oligomer by atomic force microscopy. FEBS Lett 1996; 381: 161–4. [Google Scholar]
  33. McPherson A, Malkin AJ, Kuznetsov YG. Atomic force microscopy in the study of macromolecular crystal growth. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000; 29: 361–410. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhu DW, Lorber B, Sauter C et al. Correlation between growth kinetics and properties of a novel crystal form of Thermus thermophilus aspartyltRNA synthetase-1. Acta Cryst D 2001; 57: 552–8. [Google Scholar]
  35. Florin EL, Moy VT, Gaub HE. Adhesion forces between individual ligand-receptor pairs. Science 1994; 264: 415–7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rief M, Clausen- Schaumann H, Gaub HE. Sequence dependent mechanics of single DNA molecules. Nat Struct Biol 1999; 6: 346–9. [Google Scholar]
  37. Willemsen OH, Snel MM, Cambi A, Greve J, De Grooth BG, Figdor CG. Biomolecular interactions measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 2000; 79: 3267–81. [Google Scholar]
  38. Benoit M, Gabriel D, Gerisch G, Gaub HE. Discrete interactions in cell adhesion measured by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 6: 313–7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Fisher TE, Oberhauser AF, Carrion-Vazquez M, Marszalek PE, Fernandez JM. The study of protein mechanics with the atomic force microscope. Trends Biochem Sci 1999; 24: 379–84. [Google Scholar]
  40. Oesterhelt F, Oesterhelt D, Pfeiffer M, Engel A, Gaub HE, Müller DJ. Unfolding pathways of individual bacteriorhodopsins. Science 2000; 288: 143–6. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.