Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Number 1, Janvier 2003
Page(s) 85 - 91
Section M/S Revues
Published online 15 January 2003
  1. Roeder GS. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev 1997; 11: 2600–21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, et al. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet 2001; 27: 271–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kolodner RD, Marsischky GT. Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. Cur Opin Genet Dev 1999; 9: 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  4. Peltomaki P. Deficient DNA mismatch repair: a common etiologic factor for colon cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 7: 735–40. [Google Scholar]
  5. Borts HR, Chambers SR, Abdullah MMF. The many faces of mismatch repair in meiosis. Mut Res 2000; 451: 129–50. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker SM., Bronner CE, Zhang I, et al. Male mice defective in the DNA mismatch repair gene PMS2 exhibit abnormal chromosome synapsis in meiosis. Cell 1995; 82: 309–20. [Google Scholar]
  7. De Vries SS, Baart EB, Dekker M, et al. Mouse MutS-like protein MSH5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 523–31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kneitz B, Cohen PE, Avdievich E, et al. MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev 2000; 14: 1085–97. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ross-Macdonald P, Roeder GS. Mutation of a meiosisspecific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 1994; 79: 1069–80. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hollingsworth NM, Ponte L, Halsey C. MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombinaison between homologs in Saccharomyces cervisiae but not in mismatch repair. Genes Dev 1995; 9: 1728–39. [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker SM, Plug AW, Prolla TA, et al. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat Genet 1996; 13: 336–42. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang TF, Kleckner N, Hunter N. Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three MLH1- based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 13914–9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pochart P, Woltering D, Hollingsworth NM. Conserved properties between functionally distinct MutS homologs in yeast. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 30345–9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Paquis-Flucklinger V, Santucci-Darmanin S, Paul R, Saunières A, Turc-Carel C, Desnuelle C. Cloning and expression analysis of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog: the human MSH4 gene. Genomics 1997; 44: 188–94. [Google Scholar]
  15. Santucci-Darmanin S, Walpita D, Lespinasse F, Desnuelle C, Ashley T, Paquis-Flucklinger V. MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis. FASEB J 2000; 14: 1539–47. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lipkin SM, Wang V, Jacoby R, et al. MLH3: a DNA mismatch repair gene associated with mammalian microsatellite instability. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 27–35 [Google Scholar]
  17. Santucci-Darmanin S, Neyton S, Lespinasse F, Saunières A, Gaudray P, Paquis-Flucklinger V. The DNA mismatch-repair MLH3 protein interacts with MSH4 in meiotic cells, supporting a role for this MutL homolog in mammalian meiotic recombination. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11 : 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lipkin SM, Moens PB, Wang V, et al. Meiotic arrest and aneuploidy in MLH3- deficient mice. Nat Genet 2002; 31: 385–90. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shinohara A, Ogawa T. Rad51/RecA families and the associated proteins in eukaryotes. Mutat Res 1999; 435: 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tarsounas M, Morita T, Pearlman RE, Moens PB. RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes. J Cell Biol 1999; 147: 207–19. [Google Scholar]
  21. Radman M. Mismatch repair and the fidelity of genetic recombination. Genome 1989; 31: 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  22. Worth LJR, Clark S, Radman M, Modrich P. Mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL inhibit RecAcatalyzed strand transfer between diverged DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 3238–41. [Google Scholar]
  23. Karow JK, Constantinou A, Li JL, West SC, Hickson ID. The Bloom’s syndrome gene product promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 65504–8. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schofield MJ, Nayak S, Scott TH, Du C, Hsieh P. Interaction of Escherichia coli MutS and MutL at a DNA mismatch. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 28291–9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.