Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 18, Number 12, Décembre 2002
Page(s) 1276 - 1281
Section M/S Revues : Articles de Synthèse
Published online 15 December 2002
  1. Jaeger JJ. Rodent phylogeny: new data and old problems. In: Benton MJ, ed. The phylogeny and classification of the Tetrapods. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988 : 177–99. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shedlock AM, Okada N. SINE insertions: powerful tools for molecular systematics. BioEssays 2000; 22: 148–60. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shedlock AM, Milinkovitch MC, Okada N. SINE evolution, missing data, and the origine of whales. Syst Biol 2000; 49: 808–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamdi H, Nishio H, Zielinski R, Dugaiczyk A. Origin and phylogenetic distribution of Alu DNA repeats: irreversible events in the evolution of primates. J Mol Biol 1999; 289: 861–71. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tatout C, Warwick S, Lenoir A, Deragon JM. SINE insertions as clade markers for wild crucifer species. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16: 1614–21. [Google Scholar]
  6. Batzer MA, Stoneking M, Alegria-Hartman M, et al. African origin of human-specific polymorphic Alu insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 12288–92. [Google Scholar]
  7. Novick GE, Novick CC, Yunis J, et al. Polymorphic alu insertions and the Asian origin of native American populations. Hum Biol 1998; 70: 23–39. [Google Scholar]
  8. De Pancorbo MM, Lopez-Martinez M, Martinez-Bouzas C, et al. The Basques according to polymorphic Alu insertions. Hum Genet 2001; 109: 224–33. [Google Scholar]
  9. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409: 860–921. [Google Scholar]
  10. Makalowski W. SINEs as a genomic scrap yard: an essay on genomic evolution. In: Maraia RJ, ed. The impact of short interspersed elements (SINEs) on the host genome. Austin: R.G. Landes Company, 1995 : 81–104. [Google Scholar]
  11. Okada N. SINEs: short interspersed repeated elements of the eukaryotic genome. Trends Ecol Evol 1991; 6: 358–61. [Google Scholar]
  12. Borodulina OR, Kramerov DA. Wide distribution of short interspersed elements among eukaryotic genomes. FEBS Lett 1999; 457: 409–13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lenoir A, Lavie L, Prieto JL, et al. The evolutionary origin and genomic organization of SINEs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol 2001; 18: 2315–22 [Google Scholar]
  14. Okada N, Hamada M, Ogiwara I, Ohshima K. SINEs and LINEs share common 3’ sequences: a review. Gene 1997; 205: 229–43. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jurka J. Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 1872–7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tatout C, Lavie L, Deragon JM. Similar target site selection occurs in integration of plant and mammalian retroposons. J Mol Evol 1998; 47: 463–70. [Google Scholar]
  17. Endoh H, Okada N. Total DNA transcription in vitro: a procedure to detect highly repetitive and transcribable sequences with tRNA-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 251–5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nikaido M, Rooney AP, Okada N. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interspersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 10261–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Philippe H, Laurent J. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998; 8: 616–23. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mooers AØ, Holmes EC. The evolution of base composition and phylogenetic inference. Trends Ecol Evol 2000; 15: 365–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sullivan J, Swofford DL. Are guinea pigs rodents? The importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics. J Mammal Evol 1997; 4: 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Shimamura M, Yasue H, Ohshima K, et al. Molecular evidence from retroposon that whales form a clade within even-toed Ungulata. Nature 1997; 388: 666–70. [Google Scholar]
  23. McKenna MC, Bell SK. Classification of mammals above the species level. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997 : 632 p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Montgelard C, Ducroq S, Douzery E. What is a suiforme (Artiodactyla)? Mol Phylogenet Evol 1998; 9: 528–32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nikaido M, Matsuno F, Hamilton H, et al. Retroposon analysis of major cetacean lineages: the monophyly of toothed whales and the paraphyly of river dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 7384–9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.