Authentification abonné
medsci
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 18 / Numéro 12 (Décembre 2002) Med Sci (Paris), 18 12 (2002) 1276-1281 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 18, Numéro 12, Décembre 2002
Page(s) 1276 - 1281
Section M/S Revues : Articles de Synthèse
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/200218121276
Publié en ligne 15 décembre 2002
  1. Jaeger JJ. Rodent phylogeny: new data and old problems. In: Benton MJ, ed. The phylogeny and classification of the Tetrapods. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988 : 177–99. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shedlock AM, Okada N. SINE insertions: powerful tools for molecular systematics. BioEssays 2000; 22: 148–60. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shedlock AM, Milinkovitch MC, Okada N. SINE evolution, missing data, and the origine of whales. Syst Biol 2000; 49: 808–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamdi H, Nishio H, Zielinski R, Dugaiczyk A. Origin and phylogenetic distribution of Alu DNA repeats: irreversible events in the evolution of primates. J Mol Biol 1999; 289: 861–71. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tatout C, Warwick S, Lenoir A, Deragon JM. SINE insertions as clade markers for wild crucifer species. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16: 1614–21. [Google Scholar]
  6. Batzer MA, Stoneking M, Alegria-Hartman M, et al. African origin of human-specific polymorphic Alu insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 12288–92. [Google Scholar]
  7. Novick GE, Novick CC, Yunis J, et al. Polymorphic alu insertions and the Asian origin of native American populations. Hum Biol 1998; 70: 23–39. [Google Scholar]
  8. De Pancorbo MM, Lopez-Martinez M, Martinez-Bouzas C, et al. The Basques according to polymorphic Alu insertions. Hum Genet 2001; 109: 224–33. [Google Scholar]
  9. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409: 860–921. [Google Scholar]
  10. Makalowski W. SINEs as a genomic scrap yard: an essay on genomic evolution. In: Maraia RJ, ed. The impact of short interspersed elements (SINEs) on the host genome. Austin: R.G. Landes Company, 1995 : 81–104. [Google Scholar]
  11. Okada N. SINEs: short interspersed repeated elements of the eukaryotic genome. Trends Ecol Evol 1991; 6: 358–61. [Google Scholar]
  12. Borodulina OR, Kramerov DA. Wide distribution of short interspersed elements among eukaryotic genomes. FEBS Lett 1999; 457: 409–13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lenoir A, Lavie L, Prieto JL, et al. The evolutionary origin and genomic organization of SINEs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol 2001; 18: 2315–22 [Google Scholar]
  14. Okada N, Hamada M, Ogiwara I, Ohshima K. SINEs and LINEs share common 3’ sequences: a review. Gene 1997; 205: 229–43. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jurka J. Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 1872–7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tatout C, Lavie L, Deragon JM. Similar target site selection occurs in integration of plant and mammalian retroposons. J Mol Evol 1998; 47: 463–70. [Google Scholar]
  17. Endoh H, Okada N. Total DNA transcription in vitro: a procedure to detect highly repetitive and transcribable sequences with tRNA-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 251–5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nikaido M, Rooney AP, Okada N. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interspersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 10261–6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Philippe H, Laurent J. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998; 8: 616–23. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mooers AØ, Holmes EC. The evolution of base composition and phylogenetic inference. Trends Ecol Evol 2000; 15: 365–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sullivan J, Swofford DL. Are guinea pigs rodents? The importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics. J Mammal Evol 1997; 4: 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Shimamura M, Yasue H, Ohshima K, et al. Molecular evidence from retroposon that whales form a clade within even-toed Ungulata. Nature 1997; 388: 666–70. [Google Scholar]
  23. McKenna MC, Bell SK. Classification of mammals above the species level. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997 : 632 p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Montgelard C, Ducroq S, Douzery E. What is a suiforme (Artiodactyla)? Mol Phylogenet Evol 1998; 9: 528–32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nikaido M, Matsuno F, Hamilton H, et al. Retroposon analysis of major cetacean lineages: the monophyly of toothed whales and the paraphyly of river dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 7384–9. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.