EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 17 / No 11 (Novembre 2001) Med Sci (Paris), 17 11 (2001) 1139-1148 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 17, Number 11, Novembre 2001
Page(s) 1139 - 1148
Section Articles de Synthèse
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/200117111139
Published online 15 November 2001
  1. Falconner D. The inheritance of liability to certain diseases. Ann Hum Genet 1965; 29: 51–76. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lander ES, Schork NJ. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 1994; 265: 2037- 46. [Google Scholar]
  3. Clerget-Darpoux F, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Hochez J. Effects of misspecifying genetic parameters in lod score analysis. Biometrics 1986; 42: 393–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. Am J Hum Genet 1990; 46: 229–41. [Google Scholar]
  5. Risch N, Merikangas K. Genetic analysis of complex diseases. Science 1997; 275: 1327–30. [Google Scholar]
  6. Myers A, Holmans P, Marshall H, et al. Susceptibility locus for Alzheimer’s disease on chromosome 10. Science 2000; 290: 2304–5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Spielman RS, Ewens WJ. A sibship based test for linkage in the presence of association : the sib transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62: 450–8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Feingold J. Le déséquilibre de liaison. Med Sci 1991; 7: 161–8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Laan M, Pääbo S. Mapping genes by driftgenerated linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 654–6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wright A, Carothers A, Pirastu M. Population choice in mapping genes for complex diseases. Nat Genet 1999; 23: 397–403. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kruglyak L. Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nat Genet 1999; 22: 139–44. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pfaff C, Parra E, Bonilla C, et al. Population structure in admixed populations : effect of admixture dynamics on the pattern of linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 198–207. [Google Scholar]
  13. Boehnke M. A look at linkage disequilibrium. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 246–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Schellenberg GD, Deeb SS, Boehnke M, et al. Association of an apolipoprotein CII allele with familial dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Neurogenet 1987; 4: 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yu C, Payami H, Olson JM, et al. The apolipoprotein E/CI/CII gene cluster and late-onset Alzheimer disease. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 54: 631–42. [Google Scholar]
  16. Strittmatter WJ, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 4725–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pericak-Vance MA, Bebout JL, Gaskell PC, et al. Linkage studies in familial Alzheimer disease : evidence for chromosome 19 linkage. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 48: 1034–50. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bickeböller H, Campion D, Brice A, et al. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: genotype-specific risks by age and sex. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 60: 439–46. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gray IC, Campbell DA, Spurr NK. Single nucleotide polymorphisms as tools in human genetics. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9: 2403–8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cargill M, Altshuler D, Ireland J, et al. Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nat Genet 1999; 22: 231–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996; 273: 1516–7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Collins FS, Guyer MS, Chakravarti A. Variations on a theme : cataloging human DNA sequence variation. Science 1997; 278: 1580–1. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jorde LB. Linkage disequilibrium as a gene mapping tool. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 52:362–74 [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin RE, Lai EH, Gilbert J, et al. SNPing away at complex diseases : analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms around APOE in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 383–94. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lander E, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits : guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 1995; 11: 241–7. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dipple KM, McCabe ERB. Phenotypes of patients with « simple » mendelian disorders are complex traits : thresholds, modifiers, and systems dynamics. Am J Hum.Genet 2000; 66: 1729–35. [Google Scholar]
  27. Estivill X. Complexity in a monogenic disease. Nat Genet 1996; 12: 348–50. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lander E, Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989; 121 : 185–99. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nadeau J, Frankel W. The roads from phenotypic variation to gene discovery : mutagenesis versus QTL. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 381–4. [Google Scholar]
  30. Peyron C, Faraco J, Rogers W, et al. A mutation in a case of early onset narcolepsy and a generalized absence of hypocretin peptides in human narcoleptic brains. Nat Med 2000; 6: 991–7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Heutink P. Untangling tau-related dementia. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9: 979–86. [Google Scholar]
  32. Siegel C, Waldo M, Mizner G, Adler L, Freedman R Deficit in sensory gating in schizophrenic patients and their relatives. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41: 607–12. [Google Scholar]
  33. Leonard S, Adams C, Breese CR, et al. Nicotinic receptor function in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull 1996; 22: 431–45. [Google Scholar]
  34. Risch N. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 2000; 405: 847–56. [Google Scholar]
  35. Weiss KM, Terwilliger JD. How many diseases does it take to map a gene with SNP? Nat Genet 2000; 26: 151–7. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.