Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 22, Numéro 5, Mai 2006
Page(s) 493 - 501
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2006225493
Publié en ligne 15 mai 2006
  1. Baguna J, Riutort M. The dawn of bilaterian animals : the case of acoelomorph flatworms. Bioessays 2004; 26 : 1046–57
  2. Minelli A, Fusco G. Evo-devo perspectives on segmentation : model organisms and beyond. Trends Ecol Evol 2004; 19 : 423–29.
  3. Davis GK, Patel NH. Short, long and beyond : molecular and embryological approaches to insect segmentation. Ann Rev Entomol 2002; 47 : 669–99.
  4. Schulz C, Schroder R, Hausdorf B, et al. A caudal homologue in the short germ band beetle Tribolium shows similarities to both the Drosophila and the vertebrate caudal expression patterns. Dev Genes Evol 1998; 208 : 283–89.
  5. Schroder R, Eckert C, Wolff C, Tautz D. Conserved and divergent aspects of terminal patterning in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 : 6591–6.
  6. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evol Dev 2002; 4 : 459–99.
  7. Copf T, Rabet N, Celniker S, Averof M. Posterior patterning genes and identification of a unique body region in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana. Development 2004; 130 : 5915–27.
  8. Grassé PP. Traité de zoologie : anatomie, systématique, biologie. Crustacés, tome VII, fascicule I. Paris : Masson, 1994 : 918 p.
  9. Grassé PP. Traité de zoologie : anatomie, systématique, biologie. Chélicérates, tome VI, fascicule I. Paris : Masson, 1949 : 980 p.
  10. Damen WGM, Tautz D. A Hox class 3 orthologue from the spider Cupiennius salei is expressed in a Hox-gene like fashion. Dev Genes Evol 1998; 208 : 586–90.
  11. Simonnet F, Deutsch J, Queinnec E. Hedgehog is a segment polarity gene in a crustacean and a chelicerate. Dev Genes Evol 2004; 214 : 537–45
  12. Kanki JP, Ho RK. The development of the posterior body in zebrafish. Development, 1997; 124 : 881–93.
  13. Keller R. The origin and morphogenesis of amphibian somites. Curr Top Dev Biol 2000; 47 : 183–246
  14. Pourquie O. Vertebrate somitogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Bi 2001; 17 : 311–50.
  15. Davis RL, Kirschner MW. The fate of cells in the tailbud of Xenopus laevis. Development 2000; 127 : 255–67
  16. Aulehla A, Wehrle C, Brand-Saberi B, et al. Wnt3a plays a major role in the segmentation clock controlling somitogenesis. Dev Cell 2003; 4 : 395–406
  17. Wedeen CJ. Regionalization and segmentation in the leech. J Neurol 1995; 27 : 277–93.
  18. Shimizu T, Nakamoto A. Segmentation in annelids : cellular and molecular basis for metameric body plan. Zoo Sci 2001; 18 : 285–98
  19. Gauchat D, Mazet F, Berne YC, et al. Evolution of Antp-class genes and differential expression of Hydra Hox/paraHox genes in anterior patterning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 : 4493–8.
  20. Dearden PK, Akam M. Early embryo patterning in the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria : wingless, decapentaplegic and caudal expression. Development 2001; 128 : 3435–44.
  21. Chipman AD, Arthur W, Akam M. Early development and segment formation in the centipede, Strigamia maritima (Geophilomorpha). Evol Dev 2004; 6 : 78–89.
  22. Marom K, Shapira E, Fainsod A. The chicken caudal genes establish an anterior-posterior gradient by partially overlapping temporal and spatial patterns of expression. Mech Develop 1997; 64 : 41–52.
  23. Sommer RJ, Tautz D. Involvement of an orthologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy in segment formation of the short germ-band embryo of Tribolium (Coleoptera). Nature 1993; 361 : 448–50.
  24. Tautz D. Segmentation. Dev Cell 2004; 7 : 301–12.
  25. Damen WGM. Parasegmental organization of the spider embryo implies that the parasegment is an evolutionary conserved entity in arthropod embryogenesis. Development 2002; 129 : 1239–50.
  26. Muller M, von Weizsacker E, Campos Ortega JA. Expression domains of a zebrafish homologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy correspond to primordia of alternating somites. Development 1996; 122 : 2071–8.
  27. Prud’homme B, de Rosa R, Arendt D, et al. Arthropod-like expression patterns of engrailed and wingless in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii suggest a role in segment formation. Curr Biol 2003; 13 : 1876–81.
  28. Kang D, Huang FZ, Li D, et al. A hedgehog homolog regulates gut formation in leech (Helobdella). Dev Biol 2001; 235 : 1645–57.
  29. Miyawaki K, Mito T, Sarashina I, et al. Involvement of Wingless/Armadillo signaling in the posterior sequential segmentation in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera), as revealed by RNAi analysis. Mech Develop 2004; 121 : 119–30.
  30. Janssen R, Prpic NM, Damen WGM. Gene expression suggests decoupled dorsal and ventral segmentation in the millipede Glomeris marginata (Myriapoda : Diplopoda). Dev Biol 2004; 268 : 89–104.
  31. Shimeld SM. The evolution of the hedgehog gene family in chordates : insights from amphioxus hedgehog. Dev Genes Evol 1999; 209 : 40–7.
  32. Takatori N, Satou Y, Satoh N. Expression of hedgehog genes in Ciona intestinalis embryos. Mech Develop 2002; 116 : 235–8.
  33. Irvine SQ, Martindale MQ. Expression patterns of anterior Hox genes in the polychaete Chaetopterus : correlation with morphological boundaries. Dev Biol 2000; 217 : 333–51.
  34. Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Nervous system morphogenesis in vertebrates. Med Sci (Paris) 2000; 16 : 150–8.
  35. Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 1995, 121 : 333–46.
  36. Jiang YJ, Smithers L, Lewis J. Vertebrate segmentation : the clock is linked to Notch signalling. Curr Biol 1998; 8 : 868–71.
  37. Stollewerk A, Schoppmeier M, Damen WGM. Involvement of Notch and Delta genes in spider segmentation. Nature 2003; 423 : 863–65.
  38. Nulsen C, Nagy LM. The role of wingless in the development of multibranched crustacean limbs. Dev Genes Evol 1999; 209 : 340–48.
  39. Rivera AS, Gonsalves FC, Song MH, et al. Characterization of Notch-class gene expression in segmentation stem cells and segment founder cells in Helobdella robusta (Lophotrochozoa; Annelida ; Clitellata ; Hirudina ; Glossiphoniidae). Evol Dev 2005; 7 : 588–99
  40. Hughes NC, Jacobs DK. The end of everything : metazoan terminal addition. Evol Dev 2005; 7 : 497
  41. Chen JY, Bottjer DJ, Oliveri P, et al. Small bilaterian fossils from 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian. Science 2004; 305 : 218–22.
  42. Arenas-Mena C, Cameron AR, Davidson EH. Spatial expression of Hox cluster genes in the ontogeny of a sea urchin. Development 2000; 127 : 4631–3
  43. Mooi R, David B, Wray AG. Arrays in rays : terminal addition in echinoderms and its correlation with gene expression. Evol Dev 2005; 7 : 542–55

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.