Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 41, Number 10, Octobre 2025
Les microbes, l’Anthropocène et nous
Page(s) 760 - 769
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2025139
Published online 19 November 2025
  1. Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D et al. Microbiome definition re-visited : old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 2020 ; 8 : 103. [Google Scholar]
  2. France M, Alizadeh M, Brown S, et al. Towards a deeper understanding of the vaginal microbiota. Nat Microbiol 2022 ; 7 : 367–78. [Google Scholar]
  3. Döderlein A. Das Scheidensekret und seine Bedeutung für das Puerperalfieber. Verlag von Eduard Besold. Leipzig, Germany, 1892. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sansonetti P. Avant-propos : les microbes, l’Anthropocène et nous. Med Sci (Paris) 2024 ; 40 : 653–3. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen C, Song X, Wei W et al. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nature Comm 2017 ; 8 : 875. [Google Scholar]
  6. McKinnon LR, Achilles SL, Bradshaw CS et al. The evolving facets of bacterial vaginosis : implications for HIV transmission. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2019 ; 35 : 219–28. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2011 ; 108 : 4680–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. Lactobacillus iners : friend or foe? Trends Microbiol 2017 ; 25 : 182–91. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ravel J, Brotman RM, Gajer P et al. Daily temporal dynamics of vaginal microbiota before, during and after episodes of bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome 2013 ; 1 : 29. [Google Scholar]
  10. Holm JB, France MT, Gajer P et al. Integrating compositional and functional content to describe vaginal microbiomes in health and disease. Microbiome 2023 ; 11 : 259. [Google Scholar]
  11. Olesen SW, Alm EJ. Dysbiosis is not an answer. Nat Microbiol 2016 ; 1 : 16228. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wijgert JHHM van de. The vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections are interlinked : consequences for treatment and prevention. PLoS Med 2017 ; 14 : e1002478. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bayigga L, Kateete DP, Anderson DJ, et al. Diversity of vaginal microbiota in sub-Saharan Africa and its effects on HIV transmission and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019 ; 220 : 155–66. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lebeer S, Ahannach S, Gehrmann T et al. A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors. Nat Microbiol 2023 ; 8 : 2183–95. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tamarelle J, Thiébaut ACM, Barbeyrac B de et al. Vaginal microbiota stability over 18 months in young student women in France. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2024 ; 43 : 2277–92. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamiya T, Tessandier N, Elie B et al. Factors shaping vaginal microbiota community long-term dynamics. Peer Community J 2025 ; 5 : e30. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hickey R, Zhou X, Settles M et al. Vaginal microbiota of adolescent girls prior to the onset of menarche resemble those of reproductive-age women. mBio 2015 ; 6 : e00097–15. [Google Scholar]
  18. France MT, Brown SE, Rompalo AM, et al. Identification of shared bacterial strains in the vaginal microbiota of related and unrelated reproductive-age mothers and daughters using genome-resolved metagenomics. PLoS ONE 2022 ; 17 : e0275908. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bradford LL, Ravel J. The vaginal mycobiome : a contemporary perspective on fungi in women’s health and diseases. Virulence 2017 ; 8 : 342–51. [Google Scholar]
  20. Madere FS, Monaco CL. The female reproductive tract virome : understanding the dynamic role of viruses in gynecological health and disease. Curr Opin Virol 2022 ; 52 : 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  21. Farage M, Maibach H. Lifetime changes in the vulva and vagina. Archives gynecol obstetrics 2006 ; 273 : 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  22. Romero R, Hassan S, Gajer P et al. The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women. Microbiome 2014 ; 2 : 4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Doyle R, Gondwe A, Fan YM et al. A Lactobacillus-deficient vaginal microbiota dominates postpartum women in rural Malawi. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018 ; 84 : e02150–17. [Google Scholar]
  24. DiGiulio D, Callahan B, McMurdie P et al. Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2015 ; 112 : 11060–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Brotman RM, Ravel J, Bavoil PM, et al. Microbiome, sex hormones, and immune responses in the reproductive tract : challenges for vaccine development against sexually transmitted infections. Vaccine 2014 ; 32 : 1543–52. [Google Scholar]
  26. Winston-McPherson G, Long T, Salipante S et al. The vaginal microbiome of transgender men. Clin Chem 2019 ; 65 : 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  27. Panichaya P, Panyakhamlerd K, Suwan A et al. The characteristics of vaginal microbiome comparing before and after testosterone treatment in transgender men. Transgend Health 2023 ; 0 : in press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Birse KD, Kratzer K, Zuend CF et al. The neovaginal microbiome of transgender women post-gender reassignment surgery. Microbiome 2020 ; 8 : 61. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gajer P, Brotman RM, Bai G et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci Transl Med 2012 ; 4 : 132ra52–132ra52. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hugerth L, Krog M, Vomstein K et al. Defining vaginal community dynamics : daily microbiome transitions, the role of menstruation, bacteriophages, and bacterial genes. Microbiome 2024 ; 12. [Google Scholar]
  31. Edwards VL, McComb E, Gleghorn JP, et al. Three-dimensional models of the cervicovaginal epithelia to study host-microbiome interactions and sexually transmitted infections. Pathog Dis 2022 ; 80 : ftac026. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vodstrcil LA, Hocking JS, Law M et al. Hormonal contraception is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial vaginosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013 ; 8 : e73055. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wira CR, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Patel MV. The role of sex hormones in immune protection of the female reproductive tract. Nature Rev Immunol 2015 ; 15 : 217–30. [Google Scholar]
  34. Selinger C, Rahmoun M, Murall CL et al. Cytokine response following perturbation of the cervicovaginal milieu during HPV genital infection. Immunol Res 2021 ; 69 : 255–63. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang D, Zhang J, Kalimuthu S et al. A systematically biosynthetic investigation of lactic acid bacteria reveals diverse antagonistic bacteriocins that potentially shape the human microbiome. Microbiome 2023 ; 11 : 91. [Google Scholar]
  36. France MT, Fu L, Rutt L et al. Insight into the ecology of vaginal bacteria through integrative analyses of metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data. Genome Biol 2022 ; 23 : 66. [Google Scholar]
  37. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983 ; 74 : 14–22. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991 ; 29 : 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  39. Low N, Chersich MF, Schmidlin K et al. Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and HIV infection in women: individual participant data meta-analysis. PLOS Med 2011 ; 8 : e1000416. [Google Scholar]
  40. Brusselaers N, Shrestha S, Wijgert J van de, et al. Vaginal dysbiosis and the risk of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2019 ; 221 : 9–18.e8. [Google Scholar]
  41. Haahr T, Zacho J, Bräuner M, et al. Reproductive outcome of patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment and diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis or abnormal vaginal microbiota: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2019 ; 126 : 200–7. [Google Scholar]
  42. Côté N, Pasquier JC. La prématurité spontanée et le microbiote maternel. Med Sci (Paris) 2018 ; 34 : 799–805. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mohanty T, Doke PP, Khuroo SR. Effect of bacterial vaginosis on preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Archives Gynecol Obstetrics 2023 ; 308 : 1247–55. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bourdiec A, Akoum A. L’implantation embryonnaire - Importance de la famille de l’interleukine 1. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 644–50. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bilardi JE, Walker S, Temple-Smith M et al. The burden of bacterial vaginosis: women’s experience of the physical, pmotional, sexual and social impact of living with recurrent bacterial vaginosis. PLoS ONE 2013 ; 8 : e74378. [Google Scholar]
  46. Muraoka A, Suzuki M, Hamaguchi T et al. Fusobacterium infection facilitates the development of endometriosis through the phenotypic transition of endometrial fibroblasts. Sci Transl Med 2023 ; 15 : eadd1531. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Hocking J et al. High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. J Infect Dis 2006 ; 193 : 1478–86. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vodstrcil LA, Plummer EL, Fairley CK et al. Male-partner treatment to prevent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. New Engl J Med 2025 ; 392 : 947–57. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lev-Sagie A, Goldman-Wohl D, Cohen Y et al. Vaginal microbiome transplantation in women with intractable bacterial vaginosis. Nat Med 2019 ; 25 : 1500–4. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cohen CR, Wierzbicki MR, French AL et al. Randomized trial of lactin-V to prevent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. New Engl J Med 2020 ; 382 : 1906–15. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ravel J, Jaswa EG, Gottfried S et al. A Novel multi-strain vaginal synbiotic is effective in optimizing the vaginal microbiome: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2024 ; 11 : 158. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dupont JC. Le microbiote : un concept entre le normal et le pathologique. In : le normal et le pathologique : des catégories périmées ? Éditions Matériologiques, 2022 : 231–49. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.