Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 40, Number 5, Mai 2024
Page(s) 454 - 459
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2024051
Published online 31 May 2024
  1. Chelle E Les fondations philanthropiques états-uniennes, des acteurs privés de la protection sanitaire et sociale dans le monde. Informations sociales 2021; 203–204 : 118–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Toepler S. Public philanthropic partnerships: The changing nature of government/foundation relationships in the US. International Journal of Public Administration 2018 ; 41 : 657–669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. LaChelle E. philanthropie aux États-Unis et en France. Retour sur une traditionnelle opposition. Sociologie 2017 ; 8 : 395–408. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kohler RE. Partners in science: Foundations and natural scientists, 1900–1945. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991 : 415 p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wheatley SC. The politics of philanthropy: Abraham Flexner and medical education. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988 : 249 p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bynum WF. Medical philanthropy after 1850. In : Bynum WF, Porter R, eds. Companion encyclopedia of the history of medicine. Londres/New York: Routledge, 1993 : pp.1480–1494. [Google Scholar]
  7. Stapleton DH, ed. Creating a tradition of biomedical research: Contributions to the history of the Rockefeller University. New York : Rockefeller University Press, 2004 : 314 p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Starr P. The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982 : 514 p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ebert RH. Medical education in the United States. In : Knowles JH, ed. Doing better and feeling worse: Health in the United States. New York: Norton, 1977 : 171–184. [Google Scholar]
  10. Murard L, Zylberman P. L’autre guerre (1914–1918). La santé publique en France sous l’œil de l’Amérique. Revue Historique 1986 ; 276 : 367–398. [Google Scholar]
  11. La Tournès L. fondation Rockefeller et la naissance de l’universalisme philanthropique américain. Critique internationale 2007 ; 35 : 173–197. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schneider WH, Picard JF. From the art of medicine to biomedical science in France: Modernization or americanization?. In : SchneiderWH ed. Rockefeller philanthropy and modern biomedicine: International initiatives from World War I to the Cold War. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002 : 106–124. [Google Scholar]
  13. Berliner HS. A system of scientific medicine: Philanthropic foundations in the Flexner era. New York/Londres: Tavistock, 1985 :190 p. [Google Scholar]
  14. FredericksonD. Health and the search for new knowledge. In : Knowles JH, ed. Doing better and feeling worse: Health in the United States. New York: Norton, 1977 : 159–170. [Google Scholar]
  15. SchneiderWH. The origin of medical research grant in the US: The Rockefeller Foundation and the NIH extramural funding program. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 2015 ; 70 : 279–311. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. GinzbergE. The medical triangle: Physicians, politicians, and the public. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990 : 314 p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunzberger LK. Foundations that support medical education and health care: Their missions, accomplishments, and unique role. Academic Medicine 1994 ; 69 : 8–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Glaser RJ. The impact of philanthropy on medicine and health. Perspectives on Biology and Medicine 1992 ; 36 : 46–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Conn RW, Cowhey PF, Graff Zivin JS, Martin CL. Science, philanthropy and American leadership. NBER Working Paper Series 2023, 31718. http://www.nber.org/papers/w31718. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fitzpatrick SM, Bruer JT. Science funding and private philanthropy. Science; 277 : 621. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wheeler JL, Rum SA, Wright SM. Philanthropy, medical research, and the role of development. Am J Med 2014 ; 127 : 903–904. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Science Philanthropy Alliance, Science Philanthropy Indicators Report, 2023. https://sciencephilanthropyalliance.org/science-philanthropy-indicators-report/. [Google Scholar]
  23. Murray F. Evaluating the role of science philanthropy in American research universities. Innovation Policy and the Economy 2013 ; 13 : 26–60. [Google Scholar]
  24. Myers ER, Alciati MH, Ahlport KN, Sung NS. Similarities and differences in philanthropic and federal support for medical research in the United States: An analysis of funding by nonprofits in 2006–2008. Academic Medicine 2012 ; 87 : 1574–1581. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sung NS, Hurlbert M. Support of health research by private philanthropy. In: Robertson D, Williams GH. eds. Clinical and translational science: Principles of human research. Londres: Elsevier, 2009 : 237–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Prokopetz JJZ. Soleymani Lehmann L. Physicians as fundraisers: Medical philanthropy and the doctor-patient relationship. PLoS Med 2014 ; 11 : e1001600. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chelle E. Comprendre la politique de santé aux États-Unis. Rennes: Hygée, 2019 : 152 p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ohman EM, Douglas PS, Dean LB, Ginsburg GS. Philanthropy for science: Is it a viable option?. Circulation Research 2016 ; 119 : 1057–1059. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bouvier M, Chneiweiss H. Espoirs et défis en recherche biomédicale. Med Sci (Paris) 2010 ; 26 : 3–4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Michelson ES. Philanthropy and the future of science and technology. Abingdon/New York : Routledge, 2022 : 228 p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kramer D. Foundations play a supporting role in basic science. Physics Today 2018 ; 71 : 26–29. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.