EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 40 / No 1 (Janvier 2024) Med Sci (Paris), 40 1 (2024) 24-29 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 40, Number 1, Janvier 2024
La cavité orale et les dents au cœur de la santé
Page(s) 24 - 29
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023191
Published online 01 February 2024
  1. Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, et al. Periodontitis : Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 : S162–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Schroeder HE. Oral structure biology : embryology, structure, and function of normal hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity and temporomandibular joints. Stuttgart; New York : New York : G. Thieme Verlag; Thieme Medical Publishers, 1991 : 424 p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Winning TA, Townsend GC. Oral mucosal embryology and histology. Clin Dermatol 2000; 18 : 499–511. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mak K, Manji A, Gallant-Behm C, et al. Scarless healing of oral mucosa is characterized by faster resolution of inflammation and control of myofibroblast action compared to skin wounds in the red Duroc pig model. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 56 : 168–80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wong JW, Gallant-Behm C, Wiebe C, et al. Wound healing in oral mucosa results in reduced scar formation as compared with skin : evidence from the red Duroc pig model and humans. Wound Repair Regen 2009; 17 : 717–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Glim JE, Egmond M van, Niessen FB, et al. Detrimental dermal wound healing : what can we learn from the oral mucosa ? Wound Repair Regen 2013; 21 : 648–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sciubba JJ, Waterhouse JP, Meyer J. A fine structural comparison of the healing of incisional wounds of mucosa and skin. J Oral Pathol 1978; 7 : 214–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Häkkinen L, Larjava H, Fournier BPJ. Distinct phenotype and therapeutic potential of gingival fibroblasts. Cytotherapy 2014; 16 : 1171–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Durand E, Fournier B, Couty L, et al. Endoluminal gingival fibroblast transfer reduces the size of rabbit carotid aneurisms via elastin repair. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012; 32 : 1892–901. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laverdet B, Micallef L, Lebreton C, et al. Use of mesenchymal stem cells for cutaneous repair and skin substitute elaboration. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2014; 62 : 108–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karring T, Ostergaard E, Löe H. Conservation of tissue specificity after heterotopic transplantation of gingiva and alveolar mucosa. J Periodontal Res 1971; 6 : 282–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Isaac J, Lignon G, Jacques J, et al. Ameloblastin as Biomarker of Bone. In: Preedy VR, editor. Biomarkers in Bone Disease. Biomarkers in Disease : Methods, Discoveries and Applications. Dordrecht : Springer, Netherlands, 2016 : pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang D, Gilbert JR, Zhang X, et al. Calvarial Versus Long Bone : Implications for Tailoring Skeletal Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2020; 26 : 46–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nowwarote N, Osathanon T, Kanjana K, et al. Decreased osteogenic activity and mineralization of alveolar bone cells from a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta and FAM83H 1261G >T mutation. Genes Dis 2019; 6 : 391–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bertl K, Bertl MH, Heimel P, et al. Alveolar bone resorption after primary tooth loss has a negative impact on straightforward implant installation in patients with agenesis of the lower second premolar. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 : 155–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone : implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72 : 778–85. [Google Scholar]
  17. Casey AT, Hayward RD, Harkness WF, et al. The use of autologous skull bone grafts for posterior fusion of the upper cervical spine in children. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20 : 2217–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leucht P, Kim JB, Amasha R, et al. Embryonic origin and Hox status determine progenitor cell fate during adult bone regeneration. Development 2008; 135 : 2845–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, et al. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 1998 ; 25 : 134–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hajishengallis G. Periodontitis : from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2015; 15 : 30–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Urade M, Tanaka N, Furusawa K, et al. Nationwide Survey for Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Japan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 : e364–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Isaac J, Nassif A, Asselin A, et al. Involvement of neural crest and paraxial mesoderm in oral mucosal development and healing. Biomaterials 2018; 172 : 41–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nassif A, Lignon G, Asselin A, et al. Transcriptional Regulation of Jaw Osteoblasts : Development to Pathology. J Dent Res 2022; 101 : 859–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gans C, Northcutt RG. Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates : a new head. Science 1983; 220 : 268–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Takahashi Y, Sipp D, Enomoto H. Tissue interactions in neural crest cell development and disease. Science 2013; 341 : 860–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zalc A, Sinha R, Gulati GS, et al. Reactivation of the pluripotency program precedes formation of the cranial neural crest. Science 2021; 371 : eabb4776. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Z, Huang M, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of Biological Properties and Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Mesoderm and Ectoderm. Stem Cells Int 2023; 2023 : 4547875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rinkevich Y, Walmsley GG, Hu MS, et al. Skin fibrosis. Identification and isolation of a dermal lineage with intrinsic fibrogenic potential. Science 2015; 348 : aaa2151. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mah W, Jiang G, Olver D, et al. Elevated CD26 Expression by Skin Fibroblasts Distinguishes a Profibrotic Phenotype Involved in Scar Formation Compared to Gingival Fibroblasts. Am J Pathol 2017; 187 : 1717–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rawlinson SC, McKay IJ, Ghuman M, et al. Adult rat bones maintain distinct regionalized expression of markers associated with their development. PLoS One 2009; 4 : e8358. [Google Scholar]
  31. Reichert JC, Gohlke J, Friis TE, et al. Mesodermal and neural crest derived ovine tibial and mandibular osteoblasts display distinct molecular differences. Gene 2013; 525 : 99–106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacques J, Hotton D, De la Dure-Molla M, et al. Tracking endogenous amelogenin and ameloblastin in vivo. PLoS One 2014; 9 : e99626. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rinn JL, Wang JK, Liu H, et al. A systems biology approach to anatomic diversity of skin. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128 : 776–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang HY, Chi J-T, Dudoit S, et al. Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 ; 99 : 12877–12882. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ebisawa K, Kato R, Okada M, et al. Gingival and dermal fibroblasts : their similarities and differences revealed from gene expression. J Biosci Bioeng 2011; 111 : 255–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Albandar JM, Susin C, Hughes FJ. Manifestations of systemic diseases and conditions that affect the periodontal attachment apparatus : Case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 Suppl 20 : S171–89. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Seifert AW, Kiama SG, Seifert MG, et al. Skin shedding and tissue regeneration in African spiny mice (Acomys). Nature 2012; 489 : 561–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sader F, Denis J-F, Roy S. Tissue regeneration in dentistry : Can salamanders provide insight ? Oral Dis 2018; 24 : 509–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Enoch S, Moseley R, Stephens P, et al. The oral mucosa : a model of wound healing with reduced scarring. Oral Surgery 2008; 1 : 11–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Reilly JS, Behringer WH, Trocki I. Intraoral Keloid : Complication of Forehead Flap. Otolaryngol-head neck surg 1980 ; 88 : 139–141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. de La Dure-Molla M, Fournier BP, Manzanares MC, et al. Elements of morphology : Standard terminology for the teeth and classifying genetic dental disorders. Am J Med Genet A 2019; 179 : 1913–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.