EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 39 / No 12 (Décembre 2023) Med Sci (Paris), 39 12 (2023) 953-957 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 39, Number 12, Décembre 2023
Page(s) 953 - 957
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023178
Published online 18 December 2023
  1. IBM. Qu’est-ce qu’un jumeau numérique ? 2022. https://www.ibm.com/fr-fr/topics/what-is-a-digital-twin. [Google Scholar]
  2. Olcott S, Mullen C. Digital Twin Consortium™ - Definition of a digital twin. 2020. https://www.digitaltwinconsortium.org. [Google Scholar]
  3. AIAA, AIA. Digital Twin : Definition & Value - An AIAA and AIA Position Paper. Aerospace Industries Association. 2021. https://www.aia-aerospace.org/report/digital-twin-paper/. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arup. Digital twin : towards a meaningful framework. 2019. https://www.arup.com/-/media/arup/files/publications/d/digital-twin-report.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shamanna P, Saboo B, Damodharan S, et al. Reducing HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes Using Digital Twin Technology-Enabled Precision Nutrition : A Retrospective Analysis. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11 : 2703–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elkefi S, Asan O. Digital Twins for Managing Health Care Systems : Rapid Literature Review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24 : e37641. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Simbiotix. SIMBIOTX – SImulations in Medicine, BIOtechnology and ToXicology of multicellular systems. 2022. https://team.inria.fr/simbiotx/. [Google Scholar]
  8. Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, et al. The ‘Digital Twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J 2020; 41(48) : 4556–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillette K, Gsell MAF, Prassl AJ, et al. A Framework for the generation of digital twins of cardiac electrophysiology from clinical 12-leads ECGs. Med Image Anal 2021; 71 : 102080. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sharma P, Suehling M, Flohr T, Comaniciu D. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Imaging : Status Quo, Challenges, and Future Opportunities. J Thorac Imaging 2020; 35 : S11–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Imtech. Un jumeau numérique de l’aorte contre la rupture d’anévrisme. I’MTech. 2018 https://imtech.imt.fr/2018/05/15/numerique-aorte-anevrisme/. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sim&Cure. Sim&Size. Sim and Cure 2022. https://sim-and-cure.com/simsize/. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gaebel J, Keller J, Schneider D, et al. The digital twin : Modular model-based approach to personalized medicine. Biomed Tech 2021; 66 : S62. [Google Scholar]
  14. Voigt I, Inojosa H, Dillenseger A, et al. Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol 2021; 12 : 669811. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hernandez-Boussard T, Macklin P, Greenspan EJ, et al. Digital twins for predictive oncology will be a paradigm shift for precision cancer care. Nat Med 2021; 27 : 2065–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. European Union’s Horizon 2020, Foceta. Foceta Project 2022. http://www.foceta-project.eu/concept/. [Google Scholar]
  17. Electronic Component Systems for European Leadership. Aquas Project 2022. https://aquas-project.eu/. [Google Scholar]
  18. Thorlund K, Dron L, Park JJH, Mills EJ. Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials – A Primer for Researchers. Clin Epidemiol 2020; 12 : 457–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Avicenna Alliance 2022. https://avicenna-alliance.com. [Google Scholar]
  20. Romero P, Lozano M, Martínez-Gil F, et al. Clinically-Driven Virtual Patient Cohorts Generation : An Application to Aorta. Front Physiol 2021; 12 : 713118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walsh JR, Smith AM, Pouliot Y, et al. Generating Digital Twins with Multiple Sclerosis Using Probabilistic Neural Networks 2020. Report No : arXiv : 2002.02779. http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02779. [Google Scholar]
  22. Walsh D, Schuler AM, Hall D, et al. Using digital twins to reduce sample sizes while maintaining power and statistical accuracy. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17(S9). https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2014629690&from=export. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fisher CK. Success is never a straight line—reflecting on our EMA draft qualification opinion 2021. https://www.unlearn.ai/post/success-is-never-a-straight-line-reflecting-on-our-ema-draft-qualification-opinion. [Google Scholar]
  24. European Medicines Agency. Opinions and letters of support on the qualification novel methodologies for medicine development. 2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/scientific-advice-protocol-assistance/novel-methodologies-biomarkers/opinions-letters-support-qualification-novel-methodologies-medicine-development. [Google Scholar]
  25. Costa A. UF Health and NVIDIA Build World’s Largest Clinical Language Generator. NVIDIA Blog 2022. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2022/03/22/uf-health-syngatortron-ai-synthetic-clinical-data/. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tonnessen D. SynGatorTron™ to speed medical research, alleviate privacy worries. UF Health, University of Florida Health. 2022. https://m.ufhealth.org/news/2022/syngatortron-speed-medical-research-alleviate-privacy-worries. [Google Scholar]
  27. Le Nevé S. A Saint-Etienne, une salle d’hôpital numérique pour former des étudiants. Le Monde.fr 17 sept 2019. https://www.lemonde.fr/campus/article/2019/09/17/a-saint-etienne-une-salle-d-hopital-numerique-pour-former-des-etudiants_5511300_4401467.html. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bertezene S. Le jumeau numérique en santé - Apports organisationnels et limites épistémologiques dans un contexte de crise sanitaire. Med/Sci (Paris) Med/Sci (Paris); 38 : 663–8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Braun M. Represent me : please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine. J Med Ethics 2021; medethics-2020-106134. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ethik-IA. La Garantie Humaine dans le projet de règlement sur l’IA de la Commission européenne ! DSIH 2021. https://www.dsih.fr/article/4215/la-garantie-humaine-dans-le-projet-de-reglement-sur-l-ia-de-la-commission-europeenne.html. [Google Scholar]
  31. Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés. Comment permettre à l’homme de garder la main ? Les enjeux éthiques des algorithmes et de l’intelligence artificielle. 2017 https://www.cnil.fr/sites/cnil/files/atoms/files/cnil_rapport_garder_la_main_web.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.