Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Number 11, Novembre 2022
Page(s) 919 - 925
Section M/S Revues
Published online 30 November 2022
  1. Coleman E, Radix AE, Bouman WP, et al. Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8. Int J Transgender Health 2022; 23 : S1–S259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer Met al. Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7. Int J Transgenderism 2012 ; 13 : 165–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Özer M, Toulabi SP, Fisher AD, et al. ESSM Position Statement “Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery”. Sex Med 2022; 10 : 100471. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sluis WB van der, Steensma TD, Timmermans FW, et al. Gender-Confirming Vulvoplasty in Transgender Women in the Netherlands: Incidence, Motivation Analysis, and Surgical Outcomes. J Sex Med 2020; 17 : 1566–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang D, Witten J, Berli Jet al. Does Depth Matter? Factors Affecting Choice of Vulvoplasty Over Vaginoplasty as Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery for Transgender Women. J Sex Med 2018 ; 15 : 902–906. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pariser JJ, Kim NTransgender vaginoplasty: techniques and outcomes. Transl Androl Urol 2019 ; 8 : 241–247. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horbach SER, Bouman MB, Smit JMet al. Outcome of Vaginoplasty in Male-to-Female Transgenders: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques. J Sex Med 2015 ; 12 : 1499–1512. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouman MB, van Zeijl MCT, Buncamper MEet al. Intestinal vaginoplasty revisited: a review of surgical techniques, complications, and sexual function. J Sex Med 2014 ; 11 : 1835–1847. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacoby A, Maliha S, Granieri MAet al. Robotic Davydov Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty for Augmentation of Vaginal Depth in Feminizing Vaginoplasty. J Urol 2019 ; 201 : 1171–1176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bustos SS, Bustos VP, Mascaro A, et al. Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes in Transfemale Vaginoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast. Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 : e3510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. van de Grift TC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Steensma TDet al. Body Satisfaction and Physical Appearance in Gender Dysphoria. Arch Sex Behav 2016 ; 45 : 575–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoebeke P, Selvaggi G, Ceulemans Pet al. Impact of Sex Reassignment Surgery on Lower Urinary Tract Function. Eur Urol 2005 ; 47 : 398–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Buncamper ME, Honselaar JS, Bouman MBet al. Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Neovaginoplasty Using Penile Skin in Male-to-Female Transsexuals. J Sex Med 2015 ; 12 : 1626–1634. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duflot T, Morel Journel N, Marcelli F, et al. Sexual wellbeing and satisfaction of trans-women after vaginoplasty: Results of a multicentric survey. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sigurjónsson H, Möllermark C, Rinder Jet al. Long-Term Sensitivity and Patient-Reported Functionality of the Neoclitoris After Gender Reassignment Surgery. J Sex Med 2017 ; 14 : 269–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zavlin D, Schaff J, Lellé J-Det al. Male-to-Female Sex Reassignment Surgery using the Combined Vaginoplasty Technique: Satisfaction of Transgender Patients with Aesthetic, Functional, and Sexual Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018 ; 42 : 178–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hage JJ, Bout CA, Bloem JJet al. Phalloplasty in female-to-male transsexuals: what do our patients ask for?. Ann Plast Surg 1993 ; 30 : 323–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ganor O, Taghinia AH, Diamond DAet al. Piloting a Genital Affirmation Surgical Priorities Scale for Trans Masculine Patients. Transgender Health 2019 ; 4 : 270–276. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobsson J, Andréasson M, Kölby Let al. Patients’ Priorities Regarding Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery of the Genitalia-A Pilot Study of 47 Patients in Sweden. J Sex Med 2017 ; 14 : 857–864. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Federici S, Lepri A, D’Urzo E. Sex/Gender Attribution: When the Penis Makes the Difference. Arch Sex Behav 2022; 51 : 1865–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Scalia P, Tighe KM, Elwyn G, et al. A systematic review of decision aids for gender affirming therapy. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10 : 2574–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meyer WJ, Webb A, Stuart CAet al. Physical and hormonal evaluation of transsexual patients: A longitudinal study. Arch Sex Behav 1986 ; 15 : 121–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jolly D, Wu CA, Boskey ER, et al. Is Clitoral Release Another Term for Metoidioplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Metoidioplasty Surgical Technique and Outcomes. Sex Med 2021; 9 : 100294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller TJ, Lin WC, Safa B, et al. Transgender Scrotoplasty and Perineal Reconstruction With Labia Majora Flaps: Technique and Outcomes From 147 Consecutive Cases. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 87 : 324–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hadj-Moussa M, Agarwal S, Ohl DAet al. Masculinizing Genital Gender Confirmation Surgery. Sex Med Rev 2019 ; 7 : 141–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cohanzad S.Penile Improvement Protocol in Postoperative Management of Patients Undergoing Metoidioplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016 ; 40 : 947–953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Neuville P, Carnicelli D, Paparel P, et al. Metoidioplasty With Implantation of a Specific Semirigid Prosthesis. J Sex Med 2021; 18 : 830–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Djordjevic MLNovel surgical techniques in female to male gender confirming surgery. Transl Androl Urol 2018 ; 7 : 628–638. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gillies H.Congenital absence of the penis. Br J Plast Surg 1948 ; 1 : 8–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Puckett CL, Montie JEConstruction of male genitalia in the transsexual, using a tubed groin flap for the penis and a hydraulic inflation device. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978 ; 61 : 523–530. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Falcone M, Preto M, Blecher G, et al. Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10 : 2583–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Dhont Met al. Radial forearm phalloplasty: a review of 81 cases. Eur J Plast Surg 2005 ; 28 : 206–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Perovic SV, Djinovic R, Bumbasirevic M, et al. Total phalloplasty using a musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap. BJU Int 2007; 100 : 899–905; discussion 905. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cheng C, Zhang Y, Liu Y. Technical Description and Microsurgical Outcomes in Phalloplasty Using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery and Locoregional Veins. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 : 713e–4e. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bettocchi C, Ralph DJ, Pryor JPPedicled pubic phalloplasty in females with gender dysphoria. BJU Int 2005 ; 95 : 120–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Terrier M, Morel-Journel N, Carnicelli D, et al. Suprapubic phalloplasty in transmen: surgical results and critical review. Int J Impot Res 2020; 33 : 754–61. [Google Scholar]
  37. D’Arpa S.Urethral Reconstruction in Anterolateral Thigh Flap Phalloplasty: A 93-Case Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019 ; 143 : 11. [Google Scholar]
  38. Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Selvaggi Get al. Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009 ; 124 : 510–518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Garaffa G, Ralph DJ, Christopher NTotal urethral construction with the radial artery-based forearm free flap in the transsexual. BJU Int 2010 ; 106 : 1206–1210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Falcone M, Preto M, Timpano M, et al. The surgical outcomes of radial artery forearm free-flap phalloplasty in transgender men: single-centre experience and systematic review of the current literature. Int J Impot Res 2020; 33 : 737–45. [Google Scholar]
  41. Madec F-X, Karsenty G, Yiou R, et al. [Which management for anterior urethral stricture in male? 2021 guidelines from the uro-genital reconstruction urologist group (GURU) under the aegis of CAMS-AFU (Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the French Association of Urology)]. Progres En Urol 2021; 31 : 1055–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hu C-H, Chang C-J, Wang S-W, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of urethral complications and outcomes in transgender men. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2021; S1748–6815(21)00384–3. [Google Scholar]
  43. Morrison SD, Shakir A, Vyas KSet al. Phalloplasty: A Review of Techniques and Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016 ; 138 : 594–615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Paganelli L, Morel Journel N, Terrier M, et al. Determining the outcomes of urethral construction in phalloplasty. Eur Urol 2021; 79 : S1586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Falcone M, Garaffa G, Gillo Aet al. Outcomes of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in 247 patients completing female to male gender reassignment surgery. BJU Int 2018 ; 121 : 139–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hoebeke PB, Decaestecker K, Beysens Met al. Erectile implants in female-to-male transsexuals: our experience in 129 patients. Eur Urol 2010 ; 57 : 334–340. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Neuville P, Morel-Journel N, Maucourt-Boulch Det al. Surgical Outcomes of Erectile Implants After Phalloplasty: Retrospective Analysis of 95 Procedures. J Sex Med 2016 ; 13 : 1758–1764. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pigot GLS, Sigurjónsson H, Ronkes B, et al. Surgical Experience and Outcomes of Implantation of the ZSI 100 FtM Malleable Penile Implant in Transgender Men After Phalloplasty. J Sex Med 2020; 17 : 152–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Neuville P, Morel-Journel N, Cabelguenne Det al. First Outcomes of the ZSI 475 FtM, a Specific Prosthesis Designed for Phalloplasty. J Sex Med 2019 ; 16 : 316–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. McNichols CHL, O’Brien-Coon D, Fischer B. Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life after trans male gender affirming surgery. Int J Transgender Health 2020; 21 : 410–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lawlis SM, Donkin HR, Bates JRet al. Health Concerns of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Youth and Their Parents Upon Presentation to a Transgender Clinic. J Adolesc Health 2017 ; 61 : 642–648. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pullen Sansfaçon A, Temple-Newhook J, Suerich-Gulick F, et al. The experiences of gender diverse and trans children and youth considering and initiating medical interventions in Canadian gender-affirming speciality clinics. Int J Transgenderism 2019; 20 : 371–87. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rynja SP, Jong TPVM de, Bosch JLHR, et al. Testosterone prior to hypospadias repair: Postoperative complication rates and long-term cosmetic results, penile length and body height. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14 : 31.e1-31.e8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jones BP, Rajamanoharan A, Vali S, et al. Perceptions and Motivations for Uterus Transplant in Transgender Women. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 : e2034561. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jahromi AH, Horen SR, Dorafshar AH, et al. Uterine transplantation and donation in transgender individuals; proof of concept. Int J Transgender Health 2021; 22 : 349–59. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jonczyk M, Tratnig-Frankl P, Cetrulo CGenitourinary vascularized composite allotransplantation: a review of penile transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019 ; 24 : 721–725. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Selvaggi G, Wesslen E, Elander Aet al. En Bloc Surgical Dissection for Penile Transplantation for Trans-Men: A Cadaveric Study. BioMed Res Int 2018 ; 2018 : 6754030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Selvaggi G, Manner K, Sakinis A, et al. A pilot retrospective CT angio study of the internal pudendal arteries in male bodies, for the purpose of penis transplantation to trans men. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2022; 56 : 63–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Dessy LA, Mazzocchi M, Corrias Fet al. The Use of Cultured Autologous Oral Epithelial Cells for Vaginoplasty in Male-to-Female Transsexuals: A Feasibility, Safety, and Advantageousness Clinical Pilot Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014 ; 133 : 158–161. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Frey JD, Poudrier G, Chiodo MVet al. Research Disparities in Female-to-Male Transgender Genital Reconstruction: The Charge for High-Quality Data on Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Ann Plast Surg 2017 ; 78 : 241. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.