Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 36, Number 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2020
Page(s) 654 - 654
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2020114
Published online 02 July 2020
  1. Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine 2017 ; 15 : 28–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beall J. Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. 3rd ed. 2015. https://scholarlyoa.comfiles.wordpress.com/2015/01/criteria-2015.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dadkhah M, Bianciardi G. Ranking predatory journals: solve the problem instead of removing it! Adv Pharm Bull 2016 ; 6 : 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jacob F. Evolution and tinkering. Science 1977 ; 196 : 1161–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandolini A. The bullshit asymmetry principle. Lecture delivered at XP2014 in Roma and at ALE2014 in Krakow 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Earp BD. The unbearable asymetry of bullshit. Health Watch Newsletter 2016 ; 101 : 4–5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Scott E. Debates and the globetrotters. The Talk Origins Archive 1994. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/debating/globetrotters.html [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.