EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 35 / No 8-9 (Août–Septembre 2019) Med Sci (Paris), 35 8-9 (2019) 689-692 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 35, Number 8-9, Août–Septembre 2019
Page(s) 689 - 692
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2019134
Published online 18 September 2019
  1. Tuppin P, Rudant J, Constantinou P, et al. Value of a national administrative database to guide public decisions: From the système national d’information interrégimes de l’Assurance Maladie (SNIIRAM) to the système national des données de santé (SNDS) in France. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publ 2017 ; 65 : S149–S167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005 ; 2 : e124. [Google Scholar]
  3. Integrity in scientific research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin : ALLEA - All European Academies 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  5. Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JPA. What does research reproducibility mean? Sci Transl Med 2016; 8 : 341ps12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Peng RD, Dominici F, Zeger SL. Reproducible epidemiologic research. Am J Epidemiol 2006 ; 163 : 783–789. [Google Scholar]
  7. Freire J, Bonnet P, Shasha D. Computational reproducibility: state-of-the-art, challenges, and database research opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on Management of Data - SIGMOD 12. New York, USA : ACM Press; 2012 : 593. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stodden V. The scientific method in practice: reproducibility in the computational sciences. SSRN Electron J 2010. MIT Sloan Research, Paper n° 4773–10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1550193 or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1550193. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pronk TE, Wiersma PH, van Weerden A, et al. A game theoretic analysis of research data sharing. Peer J 2015 ; 3 : e1242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Petrini C, Gainotti S. A personalist approach to public-health ethics. Bull WHO 2008 ; 86 : 624–629. [Google Scholar]
  11. Roberts MJ, Reich MR. Ethical analysis in public health. Lancet 2002; 359 : 1055–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thomas JC, Sage M, Dillenberg J, et al. A code of ethics for public health. Am J Public Health 2002; 92 :1057–9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Begley CG, Buchan AM, Dirnagl U. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility. Nature 2015; 525 : 25–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smaldino PE, McElreath R. The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci 2016; 3 : 160384. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.