EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 34 / No 11 (Novembre 2018) Med Sci (Paris), 34 11 (2018) 963-971 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 34, Number 11, Novembre 2018
Page(s) 963 - 971
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2018241
Published online 10 December 2018
  1. Thompson DW. On growth and form. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1917 [Google Scholar]
  2. Wilson HV. On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J Exp Zool 1907 ; 5 : 245–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Laks A, Rashed M. Aristite et le mouvement des animaux, Paris: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao Y, Arfat Y, Wang H, Goswami N. Muscle atrophy induced by mechanical unloading: Mechanisms and potential countermeasures. Front Physiol 2018 ; 9 : 235. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tanaka K, Nishimura N, Kawai Y. Adaptation to microgravity, deconditioning, and countermeasures. J Physiol Sci 2018 ; 67 : 271–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iskratsch T, Wolfenson H, Sheetz MP. Appreciating force and shape-the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014 ; 15 : 825–833. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sims JR, Karp S, Ingber DE. Altering the cellular mechanical force balance results in integrated changes in cell, cytoskeletal and nuclear shape. J Cell Sci 1992 ; 103 : Pt 4 1215–1222. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chicurel ME, Chen CS, Ingber DE. Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1998 ; 10 : 232–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006 ; 7 : 265–275. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lecuit T, Lenne PF, Munro E. Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2011 ; 27 : 157–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heisenberg CP, Bellaiche Y. Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 2013 ; 153 : 948–962. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Barriga EH, Franze K, Charras G, Mayor R. Tissue stiffening coordinates morphogenesis by triggering collective cell migration in vivo. Nature 2018 ; 554 : 523–527. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guillot C, Lecuit T. Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis. Science 2013 ; 340 : 1185–1189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mao Y, Baum B. Tug of war-The influence of opposing physical forces on epithelial cell morphology. Dev Biol 2015 ; 401 : (1) 92–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ishihara S, Sugimura K, Cox SJ, et al. Comparative study of non-invasive force and stress inference methods in tissue. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 2013 ; 36 : 9859. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Takeichi M.. Dynamic contacts: rearranging adherens junctions to drive epithelial remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014 ; 15 : 397–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Montell DJ. Morphogenetic cell movements: diversity from modular mechanical properties. Science 2008 ; 322 : 1502–1505. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang N, Ingber DE. Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. Biophys J 1994 ; 66 : 2181–2189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mege RM, Ishiyama N. Integration of cadherin adhesion and cytoskeleton at adherens junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2017; 9(5). [Google Scholar]
  20. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009 ; 10 : 21–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Edelman GM. Cell adhesion molecules in the regulation of animal form and tissue pattern. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1986 ; 2 : 81–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miroshnikova YA, Nava MM, Wickstrom SA. Emerging roles of mechanical forces in chromatin regulation. J Cell Sci 2018 ; 130 : 2243–2250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ladoux B, Mege RM. Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018 ; 18 : 743–757. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sugimura K, Lenne PF, Graner F. Measuring forces and stresses in situ in living tissues. Development 2016 ; 143 : 186–196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, et al. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997 ; 276 : 1425–1428. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005 ; 310 : 1139–1143. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Le HQ, Ghatak S, Yeung CY, et al. Mechanical regulation of transcription controls Polycomb-mediated gene silencing during lineage commitment. Nat Cell Biol 2016 ; 18 : 864–875. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fernandez-Sanchez ME, Barbier S, Whitehead J, et al. Mechanical induction of the tumorigenic beta-catenin pathway by tumour growth pressure. Nature 2015 ; 523 : 92–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Raab M, Gentili M, de Belly H, et al. ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science 2016 ; 352 : 359–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Begnaud S, Chen T, Delacour D, et al. Mechanics of epithelial tissues during gap closure. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2016 ; 42 : 52–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu H, Mouw JK, Weaver VM. Forcing form and function: biomechanical regulation of tumor evolution. Trends Cell Biol 2011 ; 21 : 47–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vogel V.. Unraveling the mechanobiology of extracellular matrix. Annu Rev Physiol 2018 ; 80 : 353–387. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitrossilis D, Fouchard J, Guiroy A, et al. Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 ; 106 : 18243–18248. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Reffay M, Petitjean L, Coscoy S, et al. Orientation and polarity in collectively migrating cell structures: statics and dynamics. Biophys J 2011 ; 100 : 2566–2575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Poujade M, Grasland-Mongrain E, Hertzog A, et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007 ; 104 : 15988–15993. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vedula SR, Leong MC, Lai TL, et al. Emerging modes of collective cell migration induced by geometrical constraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 ; 109 : 12974–12979. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Saw TB, Doostmohammadi A, Nier V, et al. Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion. Nature 2018 ; 544 : 212–216. [Google Scholar]
  38. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, et al. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: Externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol 2001 ; 153 : 1175–1186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ladoux B, Anon E, Lambert M, et al. Strength dependence of cadherin-mediated adhesions. Biophys J 2010 ; 98 : 534–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yao M, Qiu W, Liu R, et al. Force-dependent conformational switch of alpha-catenin controls vinculin binding. Nat Commun 2014 ; 5 : 4525. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. del Rio A, Perez-Jimenez R, Liu R, et al. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science 2009 ; 323 : 638–641. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gupta M, Sarangi BR, Deschamps J, et al. Adaptive rheology and ordering of cell cytoskeleton govern matrix rigidity sensing. Nat Commun 2015 ; 6 : 7525. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Corey DP, Hudspeth AJ. Response latency of vertebrate hair cells. Biophys J 1979 ; 26 : 499–506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Murthy SE, Dubin AE, Patapoutian A. Piezos thrive under pressure: mechanically activated ion channels in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018 ; 18 : 771–783. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Eisenhoffer GT, Loftus PD, Yoshigi M, et al. Crowding induces live cell extrusion to maintain homeostatic cell numbers in epithelia. Nature 2012 ; 484 : 546–549. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011 ; 474 : 179–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018 ; 18 : 758–770. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mendonsa AM, Na TY, Gumbiner BM. E-cadherin in contact inhibition and cancer. Oncogene 2018. [Google Scholar]
  49. Abercrombie M, Heaysman JE. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res 1954 ; 6 : 293–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Uhler C, Shivashankar GV. Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018 ; 18 : 717–727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Buxboim A, Irianto J, Swift J, et al. Coordinated increase of nuclear tension and lamin-A with matrix stiffness outcompetes lamin-B receptor that favors soft tissue phenotypes. Mol Biol Cell 2018 ; 28 : 3333–3348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Booth-Gauthier EA, Du V, Ghibaudo M, et al. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome alters nuclear shape and reduces cell motility in three dimensional model substrates. Integr Biol (Camb) 2013 ; 5 : 569–577. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hu S, Dasbiswas K, Guo Z, et al. Long-range self-organization of cytoskeletal myosin II filament stacks. Nat Cell Biol 2018 ; 19 : 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  54. Beach JR, Shao L, Remmert K, et al. Nonmuscle myosin II isoforms coassemble in living cells. Curr Biol 2014 ; 24 : 1160–1166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.