Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 34, October 2018
Cancer biomarkers
Page(s) 47 - 51
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/201834f109
Published online 07 November 2018
  1. Hellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan T. China’s 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high. BJOG 2015 ; 122 : 160–164. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999 ; 106 : 227–232. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LaSala AP, Berkeley AS. Primary cesarean section and subsequent fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987 ; 157 : 379–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. van der Voet LF, de Vaate AM B, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG 2014 ; 121 : 236–244. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Florio P, Filippeschi M, Moncini I, Marra E, Franchini M, Gubbini G. Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012 ; 24 : 180–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Xie H, Wu Y, Yu F, He M, Cao M, Yao S. A comparison of vaginal surgery and operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele: a retrospective review. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014 ; 77 : 78–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 ; 34 : 90–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. de Vaate AJ B, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Bourne T, Huirne JA. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 ; 43 : 372–382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016 ; 23 : 893–902. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 ; 34 : 85–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier RJ. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:320.e1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, de Graaf IM, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 ; 42 : 132–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Lee CL, Kay N. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:370.e1–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tanimura S, Funamoto H, Hosono T, Shitano Y, Nakashima M, Ametani Y, Nakano T. New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015 ; 41 : 1363–1369. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou J, Yao M, Wang H, Tan W, Chen P, Wang X. Vaginal Repair of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticula that Resulted in Improved Postoperative Menstruation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016 ; 23 : 969–978. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.