EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 33 / No 8-9 (Août–Septembre 2017) Med Sci (Paris), 33 8-9 (2017) 797-800 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 33, Number 8-9, Août–Septembre 2017
Page(s) 797 - 800
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20173308027
Published online 18 September 2017
  1. de La Fontaine J. Les animaux malades de la peste. Fables, 1678. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ioannidis JPA, Boyack K, Klavans R, et al. How to make more published research true. PLoS Med 2014 ; 11 : e1001747. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker M, Dolgin E. Cancer reproducibility project releases first results. Nature 2017 ; 541 : 269–270. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Laframboise D. How many scientific papers just aren’t true? The Spectator 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Krauss LM. Donald Trump’s war on science. New Yorker 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dascal M. The study of controversies and the theory and history of science. Sci Context 1998 ; 11 : 147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Latour B. Pasteur et Pouchet : hétérogenèse de l’histoire des sciences (sous la direction de Michel Serres). Éléments d’histoire des sciences 1989 : 423–445. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pestre D. L’analyse de controverses dans l’étude des sciences depuis trente ans. Mil neuf cent. Rev d’histoire Intellect 2007 ; 25 : 29–43. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jackson AM, Myerson JW, Stellacci F. Spontaneous assembly of subnanometre-ordered domains in the ligand shell of monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat Mater 2004 ; 3 : 330–336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jackson AM, Ying Hu Y, Silva PJ, Stellacci F. From homoligand- to mixed-ligand- monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles: a scanning tunneling microscopy investigation. J Am Chem Soc 2006 ; 128 : 11135–11147. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DeVries GA, Brunnbauer M, Hu Y, et al. Divalent metal nanoparticles. Science 2007 ; 315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Centrone A, Penzo E, Sharma M, et al. The role of nanostructure in the wetting behavior of mixed-monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 ; 105 : 9886–9891. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Djuranovic P. Seven years of imaging artifacts: what gives? Rapha-Z-Lab 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Levy R. Divalent metal nanoparticles. PubPeer. https://pubpeer.com/publications/4DA88768C5B279E24E469CC0080A47. [Google Scholar]
  15. Verma A, Uzun O, Hu Y, et al. Surface-structure-regulated cell-membrane penetration by monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat Mater 2008 ; 7 : 588–595. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Xia T, Rome L, Nel A. Nanobiology: particles slip cell security. Nat Mater 2008 ; 7 : 519–520. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cesbron Y, Shaw CP, Birchall JP, et al. Stripy nanoparticles revisited. Small 2012 ; 8 : 3714–3719. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yu M, Stellacci F. Response to “Stripy nanoparticles revisited”. Small 2012 ; 8 : 3720–3726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Levy R. Stripy timeline. 2012. Rapha-z-lab https://raphazlab.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/stripy-timeline/. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dove A. Do these stripes make my nanoparticles look weird? 2012. http://alandove.com/static/2012/12/do-these-stripes-make-my-nanoparticles-look-weird/. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernig DG. Ferniglab Blog. https://ferniglab.wordpress.com/?s=stripy. [Google Scholar]
  22. Neuroskeptic. Science is interpretation. Discov Mag Blogs 2014. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2014/01/04/reanalysis-science/. [Google Scholar]
  23. Natelson D. A nano-controversy. Nanoscale views 2012. http://nanoscale.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/a-nano-controversy.html. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stirling J, Lekkas I, Sweetman A, et al. Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles. PLoS One 2014 ; 9 : e108482. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ong QK, Stellacci F, Jeschke G, et al. Response to “Critical Assessment of the Evidence for Striped Nanoparticles”. PLoS One 2015 ; 10 : e0135594. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rodríguez-Lorenzo L, de la Rica R, Álvarez-Puebla RA, et al. Plasmonic nanosensors with inverse sensitivity by means of enzyme-guided crystal growth. Nat Mater 2012 ; 11 : 604–607. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de la Rica R, Stevens MM. Plasmonic ELISA for the ultrasensitive detection of disease biomarkers with the naked eye. Nat Nanotechnol 2012 ; 7 : 821–824. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. PubPeer “Plasmonic nanosensors with inverse sensitivity by means of enzyme-guided crystal growth”. https://pubpeer.com/publications/3E8208F0654769A44C22D4E78DA2B8. [Google Scholar]
  29. PubPeer “Plasmonic ELISA for the ultrasensitive detection of disease biomarkers with the naked eye”. https://pubpeer.com/publications/54AECF24E96162E3A563AED08BE0B3. [Google Scholar]
  30. Des nanoparticules d’or pour dépister VIH ou cancer à l’œil nu. Le Monde 2012. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bates C. Colour-coded blood test that turns blue if you have HIV is 10 times more sensitive than current methods. The Daily Mail 2012. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cutler JI, Auyeung E, Mirkin CA. Spherical nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc 2012 ; 134 : 1376–1391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosi NL, Giljohann DA, Thaxton CS, et al. Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene regulation. Science 2006 ; 312 : 1027–1030. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Seferos DS, Giljohann DA, Hill HD, et al. Nano-flares: probes for transfection and mRNA detection in living cells. J Am Chem Soc 2007 ; 129 : 15477–15479. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zheng D, Seferos DS, Giljohann DA, et al. Aptamer nano-flares for molecular detection in living cells. Nano Lett 2009 ; 9 : 3258–3261. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Prigodich AE, Seferos DS, Massich MD, et al. Nano-flares for mRNA Regulation and Detection. ACS Nano 2009 ; 3 : 2147–2152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Choi CHJ, Hao L, Narayan SP, et al. Mechanism for the endocytosis of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013 ; 110 : 7625–7630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu XA, Choi CHJ, Zhang C, et al. Intracellular fate of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates. J Am Chem Soc 2014 ; 136 : 7726–7733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schneider L. Do nanoparticles deliver? Merck’s Smart Flares and other controversies, 2015. https://forbetterscience.com/2015/11/20/do-nanoparticles-deliver-mercks-smart-flares-and-other-controversies/. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mason D, Carolan G, Held M, et al. The spherical nucleic acids mRNA detection paradox. ScienceOpen Res 2016 ; DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-CHEM.AZ1MJU.v1. [Google Scholar]
  41. Briley WE, Bondy MH, Randeria PS, et al. Quantification and real-time tracking of RNA in live cells using Sticky-flares. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015 ; 112 : 9591–9595. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mason D, Levy R. Sticky-flares: real-time tracking of mRNAs… or of endosomes? bioRxiv 2015. http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/10/19/029447. [Google Scholar]
  43. Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav 2017 ; 1 : 21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Glanz J, Armendariz A. Years of ethics charges, but star cancer researcher gets a pass. New York Times 2017. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.