EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 30 / No 6-7 (Juin–Juillet 2014) Med Sci (Paris), 30 6-7 (2014) 651-657 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 30, Number 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2014
Page(s) 651 - 657
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20143006015
Published online 11 July 2014
  1. Poiani A. Complexity of seminal fluid: a review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2006 ; 60 : 289–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clavert A, Cranz C, Bollack C. Functions of the seminal vesicle. Andrologia 1990 ; 22 : 185–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman T., The soup in my fly: evolution, form, function of seminal fluid proteins. PLoS Biol 2008 ; 6 : e179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kubli E. Sexual behaviour: a receptor for sex control in Drosophila females. Curr Biol 2008 ; 18 : R210–R212. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rezaval C, Pavlou HJ, Dornan AJ, et al. Neural circuitry underlying Drosophila female postmating behavioral responses. Curr Biol 2012 ; 22 : 1155–1165. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen PS, Stumm-Zollinger E, Aigaki T, et al. A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior in female D. melanogaster. Cell 1988 ; 54 : 291–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Labie D., Sex peptide, un moyen pour éradiquer le paludisme ? Med Sci (Paris) 2007 ; 23 : 1105. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mann T. The biochemistry of semen and of the male reproductive tract. London : Methuen, 1964 : 280 p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rink L, Kirchner H. Zinc-altered immune function and cytokine production. J Nutr 2000 ; 130 : S1407–S1411. [Google Scholar]
  10. Forsberg J, Wiklund C. Mating in the afternoon: Time-saving in courtship and remating by females of a polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1989 ; 25 : 349–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wolfner MF. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 1997 ; 27 : 179–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chapman T, Miyatake T, Smith HK, Partridge L. Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Proc R Soc London B 1998 ; 265 : 1879–1894. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hosken DJ, Garner TWJ, Ward PI. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr Biol 2001 ; 11 : 489–493. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yamane T, Kimura Y, Katsuhara M, Miyatake T. Female mating receptivity inhibited by injection of male-derived extracts in Callosobruchus chinensis. J Insect Physiol 2008 ; 54 : 501–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ramm SA, Oliver PL, Ponting CP, et al. Sexual selection and the adaptive evolution of mammalian ejaculate proteins. Mol Biol Evol 2008 ; 25 : 207–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klemme I, Firman Re C. Male house mice that have evolved with sperm competition have increased mating duration and paternity success. Anim Behav 2013 ; 85 : 751–758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ericsson RJ, Baker VF. Transport of oestrogens in semen to the female rat during mating and its effect on fertility. J Reprod Fertil 1966 ; 12 : 381–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In : Campbell B, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Chicago : Aldine, 1972 : 136–179. [Google Scholar]
  19. Parker GA. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2006 ; 361 : 235–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hosken DJ, Garner TWJ, Ward PI. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr Biol 2001 ; 11 : 489–493. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Darwin C. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London : John Murray, 1871 : 446 p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Parker GA. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 1970 ; 45 : 525–567. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Eberhard WG. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1996 : 502 p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Birkhead TR, Møller AP. Sperm competition and sexual selection. San Diego : Academic Press, 1998 : 826 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Anderson. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 1982 ; 299 : 818–820. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fisher RA. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen Rev 1915 ; 7 : 184–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Holland B, Rice WR. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 1998 ; 52 : 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ronn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 ; 104 : 10921–10925. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wolfner MF. Battle and ballet: molecular interactions between the sexes in Drosophila. J Hered 2009 ; 100 : 399–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Angelard C, Montchamp-Moreau C, Joly D., Female-driven mechanisms, ejaculate size, quality contribute to the lower fertility of sex-ratio distorter males in Drosophila simulans. BMC Evol Biol 2008 ; 8 : 326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith DT, Sirot LK, Wolfner MF, et al. The consequences of genetic variation in sex peptide expression levels for egg laying and retention in females. Heredity (Edinb) 2012 ; 109 : 222–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Priest NK, Roach DA, Galloway LF. Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid. Biol Lett 2008 ; 4 : 6–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jegou B. L’infertilité mâle aujourd’hui. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 447–448. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Coutton C, Satre V, Arnoult C, Ray P. Génétique de l’infertilité masculine–Les nouveaux acteurs. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 497–502. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas AF, Raymond M. Santé, médecine et sciences de l’évolution : une introduction. Bruxelles : De Boeck 2013. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.