Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 30, Numéro 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2014
Page(s) 651 - 657
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20143006015
Publié en ligne 11 juillet 2014
  1. Poiani A. Complexity of seminal fluid: a review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2006 ; 60 : 289–310. [CrossRef]
  2. Clavert A, Cranz C, Bollack C. Functions of the seminal vesicle. Andrologia 1990 ; 22 : 185–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chapman T., The soup in my fly: evolution, form, function of seminal fluid proteins. PLoS Biol 2008 ; 6 : e179. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kubli E. Sexual behaviour: a receptor for sex control in Drosophila females. Curr Biol 2008 ; 18 : R210–R212. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rezaval C, Pavlou HJ, Dornan AJ, et al. Neural circuitry underlying Drosophila female postmating behavioral responses. Curr Biol 2012 ; 22 : 1155–1165. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen PS, Stumm-Zollinger E, Aigaki T, et al. A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior in female D. melanogaster. Cell 1988 ; 54 : 291–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Labie D., Sex peptide, un moyen pour éradiquer le paludisme ? Med Sci (Paris) 2007 ; 23 : 1105.
  8. Mann T. The biochemistry of semen and of the male reproductive tract. London : Methuen, 1964 : 280 p.
  9. Rink L, Kirchner H. Zinc-altered immune function and cytokine production. J Nutr 2000 ; 130 : S1407–S1411.
  10. Forsberg J, Wiklund C. Mating in the afternoon: Time-saving in courtship and remating by females of a polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1989 ; 25 : 349–356. [CrossRef]
  11. Wolfner MF. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem Molec Biol 1997 ; 27 : 179–192. [CrossRef]
  12. Chapman T, Miyatake T, Smith HK, Partridge L. Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Proc R Soc London B 1998 ; 265 : 1879–1894. [CrossRef]
  13. Hosken DJ, Garner TWJ, Ward PI. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr Biol 2001 ; 11 : 489–493. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yamane T, Kimura Y, Katsuhara M, Miyatake T. Female mating receptivity inhibited by injection of male-derived extracts in Callosobruchus chinensis. J Insect Physiol 2008 ; 54 : 501–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ramm SA, Oliver PL, Ponting CP, et al. Sexual selection and the adaptive evolution of mammalian ejaculate proteins. Mol Biol Evol 2008 ; 25 : 207–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Klemme I, Firman Re C. Male house mice that have evolved with sperm competition have increased mating duration and paternity success. Anim Behav 2013 ; 85 : 751–758. [CrossRef]
  17. Ericsson RJ, Baker VF. Transport of oestrogens in semen to the female rat during mating and its effect on fertility. J Reprod Fertil 1966 ; 12 : 381–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In : Campbell B, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Chicago : Aldine, 1972 : 136–179.
  19. Parker GA. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2006 ; 361 : 235–259. [CrossRef]
  20. Hosken DJ, Garner TWJ, Ward PI. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr Biol 2001 ; 11 : 489–493. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Darwin C. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London : John Murray, 1871 : 446 p.
  22. Parker GA. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 1970 ; 45 : 525–567. [CrossRef]
  23. Eberhard WG. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1996 : 502 p.
  24. Birkhead TR, Møller AP. Sperm competition and sexual selection. San Diego : Academic Press, 1998 : 826 p.
  25. Anderson. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 1982 ; 299 : 818–820. [CrossRef]
  26. Fisher RA. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen Rev 1915 ; 7 : 184–192. [PubMed]
  27. Holland B, Rice WR. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 1998 ; 52 : 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ronn J, Katvala M, Arnqvist G. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 ; 104 : 10921–10925. [CrossRef]
  29. Wolfner MF. Battle and ballet: molecular interactions between the sexes in Drosophila. J Hered 2009 ; 100 : 399–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Angelard C, Montchamp-Moreau C, Joly D., Female-driven mechanisms, ejaculate size, quality contribute to the lower fertility of sex-ratio distorter males in Drosophila simulans. BMC Evol Biol 2008 ; 8 : 326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Smith DT, Sirot LK, Wolfner MF, et al. The consequences of genetic variation in sex peptide expression levels for egg laying and retention in females. Heredity (Edinb) 2012 ; 109 : 222–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Priest NK, Roach DA, Galloway LF. Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid. Biol Lett 2008 ; 4 : 6–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jegou B. L’infertilité mâle aujourd’hui. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 447–448. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  34. Coutton C, Satre V, Arnoult C, Ray P. Génétique de l’infertilité masculine–Les nouveaux acteurs. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 497–502. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  35. Thomas AF, Raymond M. Santé, médecine et sciences de l’évolution : une introduction. Bruxelles : De Boeck 2013.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.