EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 29 / No 11 (Novembre 2013) Med Sci (Paris), 29 11 (2013) 1004-1009 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 29, Number 11, Novembre 2013
Page(s) 1004 - 1009
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20132911017
Published online 20 November 2013
  1. Flannagan RS, Jaumouille V, Grinstein S. The cell biology of phagocytosis. Annual Rev Pathol 2012 ; 7 : 61–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Swanson JA. Shaping cups into phagosomes and macropinosomes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008 ; 9 : 639–649. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fededa JP, Gerlich DW. Molecular control of animal cell cytokinesis. Nat Cell Biol 2012 ; 14 : 440–447. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green RA, Paluch E, Oegema K. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2012 ; 28 : 29–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Swanson JA, Johnson MT, Beningo K, et al. A contractile activity that closes phagosomes in macrophages. J Cell Sci 1999 ; 112 : 307–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campellone KG, Welch MD. A nucleator arms race : cellular control of actin assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010 ; 11 : 237–251. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pollard TD, Cooper JA. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science 2009 ; 326 : 1208–1212. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Colucci-Guyon E, Niedergang F, Wallar BJ, et al. A role for mammalian diaphanous-related formins in complement receptor (CR3)-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages. Curr Biol 2005 ; 15 : 2007–2012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Olazabal IM, Caron E, May RC, et al. Rho-kinase and myosin-II control phagocytic cup formation during CR, but not FcgammaR, phagocytosis. Curr Biol 2002 ; 12 : 1413–1418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castrillon DH, Wasserman SA. Diaphanous is required for cytokinesis in Drosophila and shares domains of similarity with the products of the limb deformity gene. Development 1994 ; 120 : 3367–3377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eggert US, Mitchison TJ, Field CM. Animal cytokinesis : from parts list to mechanisms. Annu Rev Biochem 2006 ; 75 : 543–566. [Google Scholar]
  12. Abou-Kheir W, Isaac B, Yamaguchi H, Cox D. Membrane targeting of WAVE2 is not sufficient for WAVE2-dependent actin polymerization : a role for IRSp53 in mediating the interaction between Rac and WAVE2. J Cell Sci 2008 ; 121 : 379–390. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Watanabe S, Ando Y, Yasuda S, et al. mDia2 induces the actin scaffold for the contractile ring and stabilizes its position during cytokinesis in NIH 3T3 cells. Mol Biol Cell 2008 ; 19 : 2328–2338. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tzircotis G, Braga VM, Caron E. RhoG is required for both FcgammaR- and CR3-mediated phagocytosis. J Cell Sci 2011 ; 124 : 2897–2902. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Echard A. Phosphoinositides and cytokinesis : the « PIP » of the iceberg. Cytoskeleton 2012 ; 69 : 893–912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scott CC, Dobson W, Botelho RJ, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate hydrolysis directs actin remodeling during phagocytosis. J Cell Biol 2005 ; 169 : 139–149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marion S, Mazzolini J, Herit F, et al. The NF-kappaB signaling protein Bcl10 regulates actin dynamics by controlling AP1 and OCRL-bearing vesicles. Dev Cell 2012 ; 23 : 954–967. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dambournet D, Machicoane M, Chesneau L, et al. Rab35 GTPase and OCRL phosphatase remodel lipids and F-actin for successful cytokinesis. Nat Cell Biol 2011 ; 13 : 981–988. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Matsui S, Matsumoto S, Adachi R, et al. LIM kinase 1 modulates opsonized zymosan-triggered activation of macrophage-like U937 cells. Possible involvement of phosphorylation of cofilin and reorganization of actin cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 2002 ; 277 : 544–549. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Murthy K, Wadsworth P. Myosin-II-dependent localization and dynamics of F-actin during cytokinesis. Curr Biol 2005 ; 15 : 724–731. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gunsalus KC, Bonaccorsi S, Williams E, et al. Mutations in twinstar, a Drosophila gene encoding a cofilin/ADF homologue, result in defects in centrosome migration and cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 1995 ; 131 : 1243–1259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Araki N, Hatae T, Furukawa A, Swanson JA. Phosphoinositide-3-kinase-independent contractile activities associated with Fcgamma-receptor-mediated phagocytosis and macropinocytosis in macrophages. J Cell Sci 2003 ; 116 : 247–257. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hickson GR, Echard A, O’Farrell PH. Rho-kinase controls cell shape changes during cytokinesis. Curr Biol 2006 ; 16 : 359–370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sedzinski J, Biro M, Oswald A, et al. Polar actomyosin contractility destabilizes the position of the cytokinetic furrow. Nature 2011 ; 476 : 462–466. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Glotzer M. The 3Ms of central spindle assembly : microtubules, motors and MAPs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009 ; 10 : 9–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Allen LA, Aderem A. Molecular definition of distinct cytoskeletal structures involved in complement- and Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages. J Exp Med 1996 ; 184 : 627–637. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lewkowicz E, Herit F, Le Clainche C, et al. The microtubule-binding protein CLIP-170 coordinates mDia1 and actin reorganization during CR3-mediated phagocytosis. J Cell Biol 2008 ; 183 : 1287–1298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Braun V, Niedergang F. Linking exocytosis and endocytosis during phagocytosis. Biol Cell 2006 ; 98 : 195–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Touret N, Grinstein S. Caractéristiques dynamiques et fonctionnelles de la membrane du phagosome. Med Sci (Paris) 2006 ; 22 : 457–458. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Montagnac G, Echard A, Chavrier P. Endocytic traffic in animal cell cytokinesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008 ; 20 : 454–461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schiel JA, Prekeris R. Membrane dynamics during cytokinesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013 ; 25 : 92–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Boucrot E, Kirchhausen T. Endosomal recycling controls plasma membrane area during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 ; 104 : 7939–7944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bajno L, Peng X-R, Schreiber AD, et al. Focal exocytosis of VAMP3-containing vesicles at sites of phagosome formation. J Cell Biol 2000 ; 149 : 697–705. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Braun V, Fraisier V, Raposo G, et al. TI-VAMP/VAMP7 is required for optimal phagocytosis of opsonised particles in macrophages. EMBO J 2004 ; 23 : 4166–4176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kouranti I, Sachse M, Arouche N, et al. Rab35 regulates an endocytic recycling pathway essential for the terminal steps of cytokinesis. Curr Biol 2006 ; 16 : 1719–1725. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Egami Y, Fukuda M, Araki N. Rab35 regulates phagosome formation through recruitment of ACAP2 in macrophages during FcgammaR-mediated phagocytosis. J Cell Sci 2011 ; 124 : 3557–3567. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chesneau L, Dambournet D, Machicoane M, et al. An ARF6/Rab35 GTPase cascade for endocytic recycling and successful cytokinesis. Curr Biol 2012 ; 22 : 147–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. D’Souza-Schorey C, Chavrier P. ARF proteins : roles in membrane traffic and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006 ; 7 : 347–358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Niedergang F, Colucci-Guyon E, Dubois T, et al. ADP ribosylation factor 6 is activated and controls membrane delivery during phagocytosis in macrophages. J Cell Biol 2003 ; 161 : 1143–1150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Damiani MT, Pavarotti M, Leiva N, et al. Rab coupling protein associates with phagosomes and regulates recycling from the phagosomal compartment. Traffic 2004 ; 5 : 785–797. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schiel JA, Simon GC, Zaharris C, et al. FIP3-endosome-dependent formation of the secondary ingression mediates ESCRT-III recruitment during cytokinesis. Nat Cell Biol 2012 ; 14 : 1068–1078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Montagnac G, Sibarita JB, Loubery S, et al. ARF6 Interacts with JIP4 to control a motor switch mechanism regulating endosome traffic in cytokinesis. Curr Biol 2009 ; 19 : 184–195. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sagona AP, Nezis IP, Pedersen NM, et al. PtdIns (3) P controls cytokinesis through KIF13A-mediated recruitment of FYVE-CENT to the midbody. Nat Cell Biol 2010 ; 12 : 362–371. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Deschamps C, Echard A, Niedergang F. Phagocytosis and cytokinesis : do cells use the same tools to cut and to eat? Traffic 2013 ; 14 : 355–364. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Primeau M, Lamarche-Vane N. Coup d’œil sur les petites GTPases Rho. Med Sci (Paris) 2008 ; 24 : 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pilon A, Poüs C. Compartimentation et plasticité du réseau microtubulaire. Med Sci (Paris) 2013 ; 29 : 194–199. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.