Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 28, Number 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2012
Page(s) 563 - 564
Section Éditorial
Published online 16 July 2012
  1. Boudry C. « Biologie/ médecine 2.0 » : état des lieux. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 ; 653–658. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broudoux E, Chartron G. La communication scientifique face au Web2.0 : premiers constats et analyse. In : H2PTM’09. Hermès Science. Paris : Lavoisier 2009 : 323–236. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bester E. Les réseaux sociaux dédiés aux scientifiques : état des lieux et analyse. Colloque Medias011. Y a-t-il une richesse des réseaux sociaux ? Aix-Marseille III, 2011. 4. Gruzd A. [Google Scholar]
  4. Black FA, Le TN, Amos K. Investigating biomedical research literature in the blogosphere: a case study of diabetes and glycated hemoglobin. J Med Libr Assoc 2012 ; 100 : 34–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt CW. Trending now: using social media to predict and track disease outbreaks. Environ Health Perspect 2012 ; 120 : a30–a33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Léger A, Charlet J. Applications du web sémantique, chapitre 8. In : Charlet J, et al. eds. Information-Interaction-Intelligence 2005 ; 4 (hors série). [Google Scholar]
  7. Caulfield T, Harmon SH, Joly Y. Open science versus commercialization: a modern research conflict? Genome Med 2012 ; 4 : 17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilkinson MD, McCarthy L, Vandervalk B, et al. SADI, SHARE, and the in silico scientific method. BMC Bioinformatics 2010 ; 11 (suppl 12) : S7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.