Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 26, Number 12, Décembre 2010
Représentation en sciences du vivant
Page(s) 1103 - 1109
Section Forum
Published online 15 December 2010
  1. Terzopoulos D, Fleischer K. Deformable models. The Visual Computer 1988; 4 : 306-31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sethian J. Level set methods and fast marching methods-evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision and materials science.Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boykov Y, Kolmogorov V. An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2004; 26 : 1124-37. [Google Scholar]
  4. Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998; 2 : 1-36. [Google Scholar]
  5. Haigron P, Luo L, Coatrieux JL. Issues in image-guided therapy. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2009; 28 : 96-8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Coatrieux JL. Integrative science: biosignal processing and modelling. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2004; 23 : 9-12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Le Bihan D. Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson 1991; 7 : 1-30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Le Bihan D. Major current applications of diffusion MRI. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52 : R57-90. [Google Scholar]
  9. Muehllehner G, Karp JS. Positron emission tomography. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51 : R117-37. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wells PNT. Ultrasound imaging. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51 : R83-98. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004; 51 : 396-409. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fink M, Tanter M. Multiwave imaging and super resolution. Physics Today 2010; 28-33. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang LV. Ultrasound-mediated biophotonic imaging: a review of acoustooptical tomography and photo-acoustic tomography. Disease Markers 2003; 19 : 123-38. [Google Scholar]
  14. Selb J, Pottier L, Boccara AC. Nonlinear effects in acousto-optic imaging. Optics Letters 2002; 27 : 918-20. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmitt JM. Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a review. IEEE J Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 1999; 5 : 1205-15. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ntziachristos V, Chance B. Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging: applications to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2001; 3 : 41-6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibson AP, Hebden JC, Arridge SR. Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50 : R1-43. [Google Scholar]
  18. O’Rourke AP, Haemmerich D, Prakash P, et al. Current status of liver tumor ablation devices. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007; 4 : 523-37. [Google Scholar]
  19. Haigron P, Dillenseger JL, Luo L, et al. Image-guided therapy: evolution and breakthrough. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2010; 29 : 100-4. [Google Scholar]
  20. Andrews DW, Bednarz G, Evans JJ, et al. A review of 3 current radiosurgery systems. Surg Neurol 2006; 66 : 559-64. [Google Scholar]
  21. Seifert JK, Morris DL. World survey on the complications of hepatic and prostate cryotherapy. World J Surg 1999; 23 : 109-13. [Google Scholar]
  22. Schindl A, Schindl M, Pernerstorfer-Schon H, et al. Low-intensity laser therapy: a review. J Investig Med 2000; 48 : 312-26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bouchoux G, Lafon C, Berriet R, et al. Dual-mode ultrasound transducer for image-guided interstitial thermal therapy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34 : 607-16. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tanter M, Thomas JL, Fink M. Focusing and steering through absorbing and aberrating layers: application to ultrasonic propagation through the skull. J Acoust Soc America 1998; 103 : 2403-10. [Google Scholar]
  25. Aubry JF, Tanter M, Pernot M, Fink M. Experimental demonstration of noninvasive transskull adaptive focusing based on prior computed tomography scans. J Acoust Soc America 2003; 113 : 84-93. [Google Scholar]
  26. Troccaz J. Computer- and robot-assisted medical intervention. In : Nof S, ed. Handbook of automation. Berlin : Springer, 2009 : 1451-66. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.