EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 26 / No 12 (Décembre 2010) Med Sci (Paris), 26 12 (2010) 1035-1037 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 26, Number 12, Décembre 2010
Page(s) 1035 - 1037
Section Nouvelles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/201026121035
Published online 15 December 2010
  1. Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997; 389 : 251-60. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 2007; 39 : 1235-44. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mavrich TN, Ioshikhes IP, Venters BJ, et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res 2008; 18 : 1073-83. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mavrich TN, Jiang C, Ioshikhes IP, et al. Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 2008; 453 : 358-62. [Google Scholar]
  5. Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 2008; 132 : 887-98. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yuan GC, Liu YJ, Dion MF, et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 2005; 309 : 626-30. [Google Scholar]
  7. Burns LG, Peterson CL. The yeast SWI-SNF complex facilitates binding of a transcriptional activator to nucleosomal sites in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17 : 4811-9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Morse RH. Nucleosome disruption by transcription factor binding in yeast. Science 1993; 262 : 1563-6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu M, Simpson RT, Kladde MP. Gal4p-mediated chromatin remodeling depends on binding site position in nucleosomes but does not require DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18 : 1201-12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Floer M, Wang X, Prabhu V, et al. A RSC/nucleosome complex determines chromatin architecture and facilitates activator binding. Cell 2010; 141 : 407-18. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bai L, Charvin G, Siggia ED, Cross FR. Nucleosomedepleted regions in cell-cycle-regulated promoters ensure reliable gene expression in every cell cycle. Dev Cell 2010; 18 : 544-55. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bean JM, Siggia ED, Cross FR. Coherence and timing of cell cycle start examined at single-cell resolution. Mol Cell 2006; 21 : 3-14. [Google Scholar]
  13. Charvin G, Cross FR, Siggia ED. A microfluidic device for temporally controlled gene expression and longterm fluorescent imaging in unperturbed dividing yeast cells. PLoS One 2008; 3 : e1468. [Google Scholar]
  14. Skotheim JM, Di Talia S, Siggia ED, Cross FR. Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry. Nature 2008; 454 : 291-6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Choi JK, KimYJ. Intrinsic variability of gene expression encoded in nucleosome positioning sequences. Nat Genet 2009; 41 : 498-503. [Google Scholar]
  16. Field Y, Kaplan N, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, et al. Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4 : e1000216. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tirosh I, Barkai N. Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. Genome Res 2008; 18 : 1084-91. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.