Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 25, Number 11, Novembre 2009
Page(s) 957 - 962
Section Forum
Published online 15 November 2009
  1. Nuvolari A. Open source software development: some historical perspectives. First Monday 2005; 10 : 10. [Google Scholar]
  2. Raymond ES. The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol : O’Reilly Media, 2001 : 242 p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stallman RM. Free software, free society: selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston : Free Software Foundation, 2002 : 224 p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guadamuz A. Viral contracts or unenforceable documents ? Contractual validity of copyleft licenses. EIPR 2004; 26 : 8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Free Standard Group, The imperative for Linux standards: a recommendation for the future. San Francisco : Free Standard Group, 2005 : 14 p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haskins W. Linux ecosystem revenue to near $50 billion by 2011 (Linux Insider, 04/10/08) [Google Scholar]
  7. Feldman RC. The open source biotechnology movement: is it patent misuse ? Minn JL Sci Tech 2004; 6 : 117. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rai AK. Open and collaborative research: a new model for biomedicine. In : Hahn RW, ed. Intellectual property rights in frontier industries. Washington DC : AEI-Brookings Press, 2005 : 131–58. [Google Scholar]
  9. Benkler Y. The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven : Yale University Press, 2006 : 528 p. [Google Scholar]
  10. Merges RP. Colloquium: a new dynamism in the public domain. U Chi L Rev 2004; 71 : 183. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nicol D, Hope JE. Cooperative strategies for facilitating use of patented inventions in biotechnology. Law Context 2006; 24 : 1. [Google Scholar]
  12. Science Commons. Empirical data about materials transfer problems. Cambridge : Science Commons, 2008 (en ligne). [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee GK, Cole RE. From a firm based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux Kernel development. Org Sci 2003; 14 : 633. [Google Scholar]
  14. Niman NB, Kench BT. Open source in the pharmaceutical industry. Proc Mw Bus Econ Ass’n 2003; 124. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dalle JM, David PM. The allocation of software development resources in open source production mode. Stanford: The Stanford Institute for Economic and Policy Research, 2003 : 40 p. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lerner J, Tirole J. The economics of technology sharing: open source and beyond. J Econ Persp 2005; 19 : 99. [Google Scholar]
  17. Von Hippel E. Horizontal innovation networks by and for users. Advance access published online on May 16, 2007, Industrial and Corporate Change 10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lerner J, Tirole J. The simple economics of open source. Cambridge : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000 : 26. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hope J. Open source biotechnology: a new way to manage scientific intellectual property. GeneWatch 2005; 18 :1. [Google Scholar]
  20. Eco-Patent Commons, Eco-patent commons brochure 2008 en ligne : [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisenberg RS. Will pharmacogenomics alter the role of patents in drug development ? Pharmacogenomics 2002; 3 : 571. [Google Scholar]
  22. Thorisson GA, Stein LD. The SNP consortium website: past, present and future. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31 :1. [Google Scholar]
  23. deCode genetics, Inc. Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the securities exchange act of 1934 (2007) en ligne : [Google Scholar]
  24. NIH News, International HapMap Widens Data Access 2004 en ligne : [Google Scholar]
  25. Thorisson GA, Smith AV, Krishnan L, Stein LD. The international HapMap project web site. Genome Res 2005; 15 : 1592. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.