EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 25 / No 5 (Mai 2009) Med Sci (Paris), 25 5 (2009) 513-518 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 25, Number 5, Mai 2009
Évaluation des risques et perspectives thérapeutiques en oncologie colorectale
Page(s) 513 - 518
Section Dossier technique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2009255513
Published online 15 May 2009
  1. Triulzi M, Gillam L, Gentile F, Weyman A. Normal adult cross sectional echocardiography values: linear dimensions and chamber areas. Echocardiography 1984; 1 : 403- 26. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SS, Graham TP Jr. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovascular Magn Reson 1999; 1 :7–21 [Google Scholar]
  3. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM. Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 1984; 107 : 526–31. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ghio S, Recusani F, Klersy C, et al. Prognostic usefulness of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85 : 837–42. [Google Scholar]
  5. Forfia PR, Fisher MR, Mathai SC, et al. Tricuspid annular displacement predicts survival in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174 : 1034–41. [Google Scholar]
  6. Alam M, Wardell J, Andersson E, Samad BA, Nordlander R. Characteristics of mitral and tricuspid annular velocities determined by pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging in healthy subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12 : 618–28. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yilmaz M, Erol MK, Acikel M, Sevimli S, Alp N. Pulsed Doppler tissue imaging can help to identify patients with right ventricular infarction. Heart Vessels 2003; 18 : 112–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Meluzín J, Spinarová L, Bakala J, et al. Pulsed Doppler tissue imaging of the velocity of tricuspid annular systolic motion ; a new, rapid, and non-invasive method of evaluating right ventricular systolic function. Eur Heart J 2001; 22 : 340–8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Meluzin J, Spinarová L, Hude P, et al. Prognostic importance of various echocardiographic right ventricular functional parameters in patients with symptomatic heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18 : 435–44. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindqvist P, Caidahl K, Neuman-Andersen G, et al. Disturbed right ventricular diastolic function in patients with systemic sclerosis : a Doppler tissue imaging study. Chest 2005; 128 : 755–63. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kowalski M, Kukulski T, Jamal F, et al. Can natural strain and strain rate quantify regional myocardial deformation ? A study in healthy subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27 : 1087–97. [Google Scholar]
  12. Torrent-Guasp F, Ballester M, Buckberg GD, et al. Spatial orientation of the ventricular muscle band : physiologic contribution and surgical implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122 : 389–92. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jamal F, Bergerot C, Argaud L, Loufouat J, Ovize M. Longitudinal strain quantitates regional right ventricular contractile function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 285 : H2842–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. López-Candales A, Dohi K, Bazaz R, Edelman K. Relation of right ventricular free wall mechanical delay to right ventricular dysfunction as determined by tissue Doppler imaging. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96 : 602–6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vitarelli A, Conde Y, Cimino E, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function by strain rate imaging in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2006; 27 : 268–75. [Google Scholar]
  16. Marwick TH. Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography : ready for prime time ? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 : 1313–27. [Google Scholar]
  17. Teske AJ, De Boeck BW, Olimulder M, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of regional right ventricular function : a head-to-head comparison between 2-dimensional and tissue Doppler-derived strain analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21 : 275–83. [Google Scholar]
  18. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Demonstration of restrictive ventricular physiology by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11 : 757–68. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, et al. Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9 : 838–47. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yeo TC, Dujardin KS, Tei C, et al. Value of a Doppler-derived index combining systolic and diastolic time intervals in predicting outcome in primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81 : 1157–61. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mc Quillan BM, Picard MH, Leavitt M, Weyman AE. Clinical correlates and reference intervals for pulmonary artery systolic pressure among echocardiographically normal subjects. Circulation 2001; 104 : 2797–802. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pepi M, Tamborini G, Galli C, et al. A new formula for echo-Doppler estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994; 7 : 20–6. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marchandise B, De Bruyne B, Delaunois L, Kremer R. Noninvasive prediction of pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by Doppler echocardiography. Chest 1987; 91 : 361–5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Miguéres M, Escamilla R, Coca F, Didier A, Krempf M. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in COPD. Chest 1990; 98 : 280–5. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.