Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 23, Number 2, Février 2007
Page(s) 193 - 197
Section M/S revues
Published online 15 February 2007
  1. Shallice T. Specialisation within the semantic system. Cogn Neuropsychol 1988; 5 : 133–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Caramazza A, Hillis AE, Rapp BC, Romani C. The multiple semantics hypothesis: multiple confusions ? Cogn Neuropsychol 1990; 7 : 161–89. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980; 207 : 203–5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Deacon D, Breton F, Ritter W, Vaughan HG. The relationship between N2 and N400: scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance. Psychophysiology 1991; 28 : 185–200. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pritchard WS, Shappell SA, Brandt ME. Psychophysiology of N200/N400: a review and classification scheme. Adv Psychophysiol 1991; 4: 43–106. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 1984; 307 : 161–3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bentin S, McCarthy G, Wood CC. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 60 : 343–55. [Google Scholar]
  8. Neely JH. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition. In : Besner D, Humphreys G, eds. Basic processes in reading: visual word recognition. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1991 : 264–336. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kahlaoui K, Magnié MN, Baccino T, Joanette Y. Picture and word processing: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences against the dual coding theory. Montréal, Canada : 15th Annual Meeting of Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, 2005 (poster). [Google Scholar]
  10. Federmeier KD, Kutas M. A rose by any other name: long-term memory structure and sentence processing. J Mem Lang 1999; 41 : 469–95. [Google Scholar]
  11. Holcomb PJ, Anderson J, Grainger J. An electrophysiological study of cross-modal repetition priming. Psychophysiology 2005; 42 : 493–507. [Google Scholar]
  12. Caldara R, Jermann F, Arango GL, Van der Linden M. Is the N400 category-specific ? A face and language processing study. Neuroreport 2004; 15 : 2589–93. [Google Scholar]
  13. West CW, Holcomb PJ. Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cogn Brain Res 2002; 13 : 363–75. [Google Scholar]
  14. McPherson WB, Holcomb PJ. An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 1999; 36 : 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rebai M, Bernard C, Lannou J. The Stroop’s test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400. Int J Neurosci 1997; 91 : 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ziegler JC, Benraiss A, Besson M. From print to meaning: an electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. Psychophysiology 1999; 36 : 775–85. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kutas M. Electrical signs of language in the brain. In : Fuchs C, Robert S, eds. Human cognitive processing: language diversity and cognitive representations. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 1999 : 159–78. [Google Scholar]
  18. Polich J. N400 from sentences, semantic categories, number and letter strings ? Bull Psychon Soc 1985; 23 : 361–4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Besson M, Faita F, Czternasty C, Kutas M. What’s in a pause: event-related potential analysis of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences. Biol Psychol 1997; 46 : 3–23. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Mem Cogn 1983; 11 : 539–50. [Google Scholar]
  21. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 1992; 31: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hagoort P, Brown C, Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Lang Cogn Proc 1993; 8 : 439–83. [Google Scholar]
  23. Barrett SE, Rugg MD. Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain Cogn 1990; 14 : 201–12. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nigam A, Hoffman JE, Simons RF. N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words. J Cogn Neurosci 1992; 4 : 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ganis G, Kutas M, Sereno MI. The search for common sense : an electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. J Cogn Neurosci 1996; 8 : 89–106. [Google Scholar]
  26. Federmeier KD, Kutas M. Meaning and modality: influence of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictibility on picture processing. J Exp Psychol LMC 2001; 27 : 202–24. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamm JP, Johnson BW, Kirk IJ. Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113 : 1339–50. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vannucci M, Grunwald T, Pezer N, et al. Hippocampus proper distinguishes between identified and unidentified real-life visual objects: an intracranial ERP study. Neurosci Lett 2006; 401 : 165–70. [Google Scholar]
  29. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 1992; 31 : 785–806. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vannucci M, Dietl T, Pezer N, et al. Hippocampal function and visual object processing in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroreport 2003; 14 : 1489–92. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dietl T, Trautner P, Staedtgen M, et al. Processing of famous faces and medial temporal lobe event-related potentials: a depth electrode study. NeuroImage 2005; 25 : 401–7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bostanov V, Kotchoubey B. Recognition of affective prosody: continuous wavelet measures of event-related brain potentials to emotional exclamations. Psychophysiology 2004; 41 : 259–68. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhou X, Chen C, Dong Q, et al. Event-related potentials of single-digit addition, subtraction, and multiplication. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44 : 2500–7. [Google Scholar]
  34. Paivio A. Mental representations: a dual coding approach. New York : Oxford University Press, 1986 : 336 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.