Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 23, Numéro 2, Février 2007
Page(s) 193 - 197
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2007232193
Publié en ligne 15 février 2007
  1. Shallice T. Specialisation within the semantic system. Cogn Neuropsychol 1988; 5 : 133–42.
  2. Caramazza A, Hillis AE, Rapp BC, Romani C. The multiple semantics hypothesis: multiple confusions ? Cogn Neuropsychol 1990; 7 : 161–89.
  3. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980; 207 : 203–5.
  4. Deacon D, Breton F, Ritter W, Vaughan HG. The relationship between N2 and N400: scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance. Psychophysiology 1991; 28 : 185–200.
  5. Pritchard WS, Shappell SA, Brandt ME. Psychophysiology of N200/N400: a review and classification scheme. Adv Psychophysiol 1991; 4: 43–106.
  6. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 1984; 307 : 161–3.
  7. Bentin S, McCarthy G, Wood CC. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 60 : 343–55.
  8. Neely JH. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition. In : Besner D, Humphreys G, eds. Basic processes in reading: visual word recognition. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1991 : 264–336.
  9. Kahlaoui K, Magnié MN, Baccino T, Joanette Y. Picture and word processing: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences against the dual coding theory. Montréal, Canada : 15th Annual Meeting of Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, 2005 (poster).
  10. Federmeier KD, Kutas M. A rose by any other name: long-term memory structure and sentence processing. J Mem Lang 1999; 41 : 469–95.
  11. Holcomb PJ, Anderson J, Grainger J. An electrophysiological study of cross-modal repetition priming. Psychophysiology 2005; 42 : 493–507.
  12. Caldara R, Jermann F, Arango GL, Van der Linden M. Is the N400 category-specific ? A face and language processing study. Neuroreport 2004; 15 : 2589–93.
  13. West CW, Holcomb PJ. Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cogn Brain Res 2002; 13 : 363–75.
  14. McPherson WB, Holcomb PJ. An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 1999; 36 : 53–65.
  15. Rebai M, Bernard C, Lannou J. The Stroop’s test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400. Int J Neurosci 1997; 91 : 85–94.
  16. Ziegler JC, Benraiss A, Besson M. From print to meaning: an electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. Psychophysiology 1999; 36 : 775–85.
  17. Kutas M. Electrical signs of language in the brain. In : Fuchs C, Robert S, eds. Human cognitive processing: language diversity and cognitive representations. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 1999 : 159–78.
  18. Polich J. N400 from sentences, semantic categories, number and letter strings ? Bull Psychon Soc 1985; 23 : 361–4.
  19. Besson M, Faita F, Czternasty C, Kutas M. What’s in a pause: event-related potential analysis of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences. Biol Psychol 1997; 46 : 3–23.
  20. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Mem Cogn 1983; 11 : 539–50.
  21. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 1992; 31: 1–22.
  22. Hagoort P, Brown C, Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Lang Cogn Proc 1993; 8 : 439–83.
  23. Barrett SE, Rugg MD. Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain Cogn 1990; 14 : 201–12.
  24. Nigam A, Hoffman JE, Simons RF. N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words. J Cogn Neurosci 1992; 4 : 15–22.
  25. Ganis G, Kutas M, Sereno MI. The search for common sense : an electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. J Cogn Neurosci 1996; 8 : 89–106.
  26. Federmeier KD, Kutas M. Meaning and modality: influence of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictibility on picture processing. J Exp Psychol LMC 2001; 27 : 202–24.
  27. Hamm JP, Johnson BW, Kirk IJ. Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113 : 1339–50.
  28. Vannucci M, Grunwald T, Pezer N, et al. Hippocampus proper distinguishes between identified and unidentified real-life visual objects: an intracranial ERP study. Neurosci Lett 2006; 401 : 165–70.
  29. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 1992; 31 : 785–806.
  30. Vannucci M, Dietl T, Pezer N, et al. Hippocampal function and visual object processing in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroreport 2003; 14 : 1489–92.
  31. Dietl T, Trautner P, Staedtgen M, et al. Processing of famous faces and medial temporal lobe event-related potentials: a depth electrode study. NeuroImage 2005; 25 : 401–7.
  32. Bostanov V, Kotchoubey B. Recognition of affective prosody: continuous wavelet measures of event-related brain potentials to emotional exclamations. Psychophysiology 2004; 41 : 259–68.
  33. Zhou X, Chen C, Dong Q, et al. Event-related potentials of single-digit addition, subtraction, and multiplication. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44 : 2500–7.
  34. Paivio A. Mental representations: a dual coding approach. New York : Oxford University Press, 1986 : 336 p.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.