EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 22 / No 2 (Février 2006) Med Sci (Paris), 22 2 (2006) 158-163 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 22, Number 2, Février 2006
Page(s) 158 - 163
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2006222158
Published online 15 February 2006
  1. Saint-Mezard P, Rosieres A, Krasteva M, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14 : 284–95. [Google Scholar]
  2. Blauvelt A, Hwang ST, Udey MC. Allergic and immunologic diseases of the skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111 : S560–70. [Google Scholar]
  3. Belsito DV. The diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prevention of allergic contact dermatitis in the new millennium. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 105 : 409–20. [Google Scholar]
  4. Revillard JP. Innate immunity. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12 : 224–7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Buckley DA, Rycroft RJ, White IR, McFadden JP. Fragrance as an occupational allergen. Occup Med (Lond) 2002; 52 : 13–6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Akiba H, Kehren J, Ducluzeau MT, et al. Skin inflammation during contact hypersensitivity is mediated by early recruitment of CD8+ T cytotoxic 1 cells inducing keratinocyte apoptosis. J Immunol 2002; 168 : 3079–87. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kehren J, Desvignes C, Krasteva M, et al. Cytotoxicity is mandatory for CD8+ T cell-mediated contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 1999; 189 : 779–86. [Google Scholar]
  8. Krasteva M, Kehren J, Horand F, et al. Dual role of dendritic cells in the induction and down-regulation of antigen-specific cutaneous inflammation. J Immunol 1998; 160 : 1181–90. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bour H, Peyron E, Gaucherand M, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted CD8+ T cells and class II-restricted CD4+ T cells, respectively, mediate and regulate contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene. Eur J Immunol 1995; 25 : 3006–10. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cavani A, Albanesi C, Traidl C, et al. Effector and regulatory T cells in allergic contact dermatitis. Trends Immunol 2001; 22 : 118–20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubois B, Chapat L, Goubier A, et al. Innate CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are required for oral tolerance and inhibition of CD8+ T cells mediating skin inflammation. Blood 2003; 102 : 3295–301. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cavani A, Nasorri F, Prezzi C, et al. Human CD4+ T lymphocytes with remarkable regulatory functions on dendritic cells and nickel-specific Th1 immune responses. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 114 : 295–302. [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu H, DiIulio NA, Fairchild RL. T cell populations primed by hapten sensitization in contact sensitivity are distinguished by polarized patterns of cytokine production : interferon gamma-producing (Tc1) effector CD8+ T cells and interleukin (Il) 4/Il-10-producing (Th2) negative regulatory CD4+ T cells. J Exp Med 1996; 183 : 1001–12. [Google Scholar]
  14. Paust S, Cantor H. Regulatory T cells and autoimmune disease. Immunol Rev 2005; 204 : 195–207. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hawrylowicz CM, O’Garra A. Potential role of interleukin-10-secreting regulatory T cells in allergy and asthma. Nat Rev Immunol 2005; 5 : 271–83. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising Foxp3-expressing CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in immunological tolerance to self and non-self. Nat Immunol 2005; 6 : 345–52. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubois B, Chapat L, Goubier A, Kaiserlian D. CD4+CD25+ T cells as key regulators of immune responses. Eur J Dermatol 2003; 13 : 111–6. [Google Scholar]
  18. Akdis CA, Blesken T, Akdis M, et al. Role of interleukin-10 in specific immunotherapy. J Clin Invest 1998; 102 : 98–106. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dubois B, Goubier A, Joubert G, Kaiserlian D. Oral tolerance and regulation of mucosal immunity. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005; 62 : 1322–32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maurer M, Seidel-Guyenot W, Metz M, et al. Critical role of IL-10 in the induction of low zone tolerance to contact allergens. J Clin Invest 2003; 112 : 432–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakamura K, Kitani A, Strober W. Cell contact-dependent immunosuppression by CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells is mediated by cell surface-bound transforming growth factor beta. J Exp Med 2001; 194 : 629–44. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gorbachev AV, Fairchild RL. CD4+ T cells regulate CD8+ T cell-mediated cutaneous immune responses by restricting effector T cell development through a Fas ligand-dependent mechanism. J Immunol 2004; 172 : 2286–95. [Google Scholar]
  23. Foussat A, Cottrez F, Brun V, et al. A comparative study between T regulatory type 1 and CD4+ CD25+ T cells in the control of inflammation. J Immunol 2003; 171 : 5018–26. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kish DD, Gorbachev AV, Fairchild RL. CD8+ T cells produce IL-2, which is required for CD4+CD25+ T cell regulation of effector CD8+ T cell development for contact hypersensitivity responses. J Leukoc Biol 2005; 78 : 725–35. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruckert R, Brandt K, Hofmann U, et al. IL-2-IgG2b fusion protein suppresses murine contact hypersensitivity in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 119 : 370–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Isolauri E. Dietary modification of atopic disease : Use of probiotics in the prevention of atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2004; 4 : 270–5. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chapat L, Chemin K, Dubois B, et al. Lactobacillus casei reduces CD8+ T cell-mediated skin inflammation. Eur J Immunol 2004; 34 : 2520–8. [Google Scholar]
  28. Desvignes C, Etchart N, Kehren J, et al. Oral administration of hapten inhibits in vivo induction of specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells mediating tissue inflammation : a role for regulatory CD4+ T cells. J Immunol 2000; 164 : 2515–22. [Google Scholar]
  29. Prystupa K, Rudzki E. Oral tolerance of nickel in patients with dyshidrosis. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42 : 276–7. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bagot M, Charue D, Flechet M, et al. Oral desensitization in nickel allergy induces a decrease in nickel-specific T cells. Eur J Dermatol 1995; 5 : 614–7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Steinbrink K, Sorg C, Macher E. Low zone tolerance to contact allergens in mice : a functional role for CD8+ T helper type 2 cells. J Exp Med 1996; 183 : 759–68. [Google Scholar]
  32. Krasteva M, Aubin F, Laventurier S, et al. MHC class II-KO mice are resistant to the immunosuppressive effects of UV light. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12 : 10–9. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schwarz A, Maeda A, Wild MK, et al. Ultraviolet radiation-induced regulatory T cells not only inhibit the induction but can suppress the effector phase of contact hypersensitivity. J Immunol 2004; 172 : 1036–43. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.